My thoughts exactly - the reasoning of this bill is only logical.
However, I unfortunately disagree with your conclusion. As we see on these forums all the time, many people have black and white thinking while lacking a sense of proportion. They’ll find this type of logic irresistible, and that’s before you even get to those who are primarily motivated by misogyny.
I also think the pro-choice movement doesn’t really tackle head on the clash of ‘rights’. I too think it absurd - and insulting - that the will, well-being and autonomy of a fully conscious human being can be overridden by an embryo that is not even going to have any understanding of its situation and will not experience suffering. I can I understand why - it’s not a ‘nice’ argument and it’s more difficult to articulate than ‘healthcare’ - but it is the crux of it for most. The basic right to not be forced to give up your body to another is paramount. But it isn’t centred in this debate.