For some reason even though in the post 2 others quoted that i wasn't trying to excuse the teacher, then presumed to lecture me on the basis that i was excusing her.
To put it simply, I am saying that she may just have decided she didn't care.
That finding that somebody had reported her for a few tweets based against the years of teaching she had presumably been sucessful at, wasn't worth complying with a doctrine she doesn't subscribe to.
I dont have the information about where and how the comments on social media were made, whether they were under a psuedoname etc.. Was it a personal account. Was it on some shared school platform?
If as another post suggests there was only the mention of one pupil, presumably she could have tried to explain it away as a momentary lapse or something.
But clearly she couldn't be bothered, or couldn't bring herself to play the game she was meant to.
Nobody has said anything about pupils bullying her, but if you are working in a climate where only one side of the story is seen as being the one to side with, you might just shrug your shoulders and move on.
None of us know. She might be really unwell.
I do realise a pupil could have been really upset.
But equally, safeguarding isn't always about saying the pupils perspective if right. Individual pupils, let alone gangs of pupils, can be bullies, especially if someone is vulnerable.
Is there anything about what the school did to begin with when this first happened.
To have got to the stage of being struck off implies what? That the school tried to resovle it and she wouldn't co-operate with what they thought was the needed outcome of complaints.
Or the school having become aware of the tweets just went straight to the process of getting her struck off.
Was there anything in the media prior to this decision.