Lexi Secker, rapist, and his pronouns

Has this been posted?

The BBC seems unable to accept that there might be more to the trans issue than puff pieces promoting drag queens and middle-aged men in dodgy wigs crying about being misgendered. The bigger, darker and more profound story – that perverts with criminal intentions are dressing up as human-rights activists – gets no attention from the BBC. But it is worth asking who benefits when men are free to identify into women-only spaces? Who benefits from the argument that children can consent to medical interventions that affect the rest of their lives? Who benefits from arresting the physical development of children? The BBC’s refusal to even acknowledge, let alone ask, these inconvenient questions is starting to look a lot like deeply ingrained bias.

Nails it. Well said, Jo!

Jo Bartosch has written about this in Spiked

https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/09/29/this-rapist-is-a-man-so-why-cant-the-bbc-say-so/

You remove the lenient sentences for being trans and then you see the amount of trans identified offenders drop massively.

YouTube should remove his channel as it was part of his grift to avoid jail time.

Well done to her for putting herself through the trauma of a rape trial, and for not letting herself be bullied into referring to him as a woman.

lcakethereforeIam · Yesterday 17:15

I posted a Telegraph article about this in the It will never happen thread. The extra information on the judge does concern me regarding sentencing

especially as the judge being quoted here

+ + The judge said he was sentencing Secker “with regard to how difficult a prison sentence in a male institution will be for you”. + +

Did he reduce the sentence because Secker claimed to be trans? I'm struggling to see any other interpretation to that comment.

Yes, that struck me too and it's exactly what I concluded/

If referring to the rapist I imagine it would be more natural to say "he got convicted". "Got a conviction" generally refers to the other side.

My apologies. I genuinely thought you meant the rapist.

@LakelandDreams I WAS REFERRING TO THE VICTIM. The only "she" in this story. I've been told off once already on this thread by another poster, I don't need it again. It's your assumption that I'm referring to the pos rapist that's the issue here. Language has been so successfully "queered" that people not longer understand basic English grammar.

He got a conviction. Your refusal to use his correct pronouns here is as offensive to the victim as the judge and barristers.

So it appears that after the rape he created this trans persona, creating videos on YouTube and being vocal on social media, for what I assume as evidence to assist his defence in his criminal trial.

Probably even worse for activists that now it is seen that people become activists to try to avoid (or lessen) criminal proceedings.

You have to wonder if someone is giving these people advice on how to escape justice and that currently creating a trans persona is one way to do it.

At the very least the fact that articles are published with this false name prevents people doing very basic background checks on the guy.

Absolutely this.

A bit of makeup and a dress doesn't make a man a woman.
He's a rapist.

Bloody hell. Absolutely unhinged.

Many of Secker’s video essays were centered around condemning classic horror films which played on the tropes of crossdressing villains

Ironic.

The people going along with the female pronouns are doing a performative display of patriarchal dominance

This.

Including the judge.

It's a massive, deliberate insult to women everywhere.

Quite. My first thought was, 'I'll bet he has an interesting hard drive...'

His pronouns are "Rapist Bastard"

And the pronouns of all who sat in the court referring to him as a woman are "Rapist Enablers"

Exactly what I was thinking.

I imagine this rapist will suddenly and magically, 'become' a man again on his way to the male prison.

Because it would take that last step - which will have to come - into being clear with the world that calling someone by chosen rather than sex based pronouns is an honorific, a gesture of indulgence, that is not an entitlement.