Rapists will be banned from self-IDing as women in Scotland

Apologies, Tiffany Scott was a violent sex offender.

I was thinking if Paris Green, murderer.

All of these dangerous men were held in womens prison in Scotland.

And Tiffany Scott was just a murderer.

Katie Dolatowski only sexually assaulted children, I suppose.

It should also be pointed out that male rapists, such as Bryson, often only discover their feminine identity after conviction and , as they have been convicted as men, the records reflect this.

Despite panic and hysteria spread by the far-right media and a certain billionaire, this hasn't actually happened in Scotland.

Statement from police said no rapist had been recorded as female, but there was no reassurance that other violent male offenders, including those accused of sexual assault but not rape, have not been recorded as female.

Isla Bryson?

Why would the police announce that this would no longer be happening, if it hasn't in fact ever happened?

Can you please not use misogynistic terms here?

Most women don't like their concerns being dismissed as silly old womanly 'hysteria'.

https://news.stv.tv/scotland/police-scotland-insist-no-man-charged-with-rape-has-been-recorded-as-female

Despite panic and hysteria spread by the far-right media and a certain billionaire, this hasn't actually happened in Scotland.

So much depends on a penis. It seems.

It should not just be in Scotland.

So none rapey paedos and none rapey sexual assaulters will continue to be transwomen not men?

Yes that's my understanding.

There is a pump in one of the 'testicles' that you squeeze repeatedly to pump the penis up.

Although, and this was a few years ago so it might have changed, one of the options I saw was that you have some kind of rod in the penis permanently, so you have a permanent 'erection'.

I mean, I read it at the time, and thought it was bizarre.

But now, with the benefit of a few years in between it sounds utterly unhinged. But if it's true, a rape would not be out of the question

I am increasingly thinking the main problem with politics and people in important decision making and service provision jobs is that many of the people who want to do it are exactly the people who should not be allowed anywhere near such positions. As the man on the televised debate with Starmer and Sunak said in despair, you two cannot be the best we've got in this country.

Will a transman who rapes with a surgically constructed 'penis' be classed as a man? Will a GRC affect that?

My understanding is these "assigned" penises need to be pumped with air or something to make them work. "Uh, excuse me, I need a moment here until I'm able to rape you." The utter fucking absurdity of all of this...

There were a few decades of my life where I truly believed that people with very important jobs were competent to make better laws and policies, even if I disagreed with their direction. Trans has thoroughly disabused me of this. I'd imagine a 12-year-old given the same assignment would fare far better than these numb nuts.

See, I thought "It's Schrodinger's schlong" was the best thing I was going to read on the Internet today...

... but then I read

"A doctorate of ladylikeness?"

Now it's a toss up. Sorry, tosser.

I don’t understand how people can cope with the level of cognitive dissonance involved in genderism. “Recording crimes committed by males as being committed by females won’t distort the stats because Magical Ladyfeelz” 🤦‍♀️ It’s clearly visible in the crime stats that this causes distortion & any future historian is going to be SOL trying to research female crime & criminality in the first half of the C21 because of all the males lumped in 🤦‍♀️😡🤬

Hopefully work done by feminists to try to correct the public record will both be preserved & of some use; but the conscious decision by multiple public bodies to reject accurate data collection in favour of muddled nonsense is absolutely scandalous.

What an utter waste of police time, just no! No men are women. You can't tell a rapist by his looks either... damn it no.

Another wee brick out of the wall is a good thing & the inconsistency will pull more out.

it's not a good day when Sturgeon's male/female/rapist gender divisions are the more consistent option 🤦🏻‍♀️

Cheers to Murray Blackburn Mackenzie whose work is as always right on point 🥃

Any man who declares he has changed sex simultaneously reveals his sexism.

Well … quite.

Except, he already has done a sexism by declaring being a woman….

Where does Sarah Jane Baker fit in here? Violent, aggressive, threatening, cut his own balls off and apparently ate them, but he's still allowed ladypoints?

Any man who says hes a woman but does a bad thing can't be a woman. Unless its shoplifting. Then he can be a woman.

What if he does a sexism? Is he punished by having his ladyrights taken away? Does he collect lady points for good behaviour? With a GRC as a kind of graduation? A doctorate of ladylikeness?

Prisons are already full without trying to add hundreds more.