GC Employment tribunal cases have an incredible 78% success rate

I'd like to know the breakdown backed on cases versus
Public Sector
Private Sector
Third Sector
and
Political Parties

I read it as Jo Phoenix excluding those cases where people's GC beliefs have a basis in religion ie.not basing their objection on science or fact but because the bible says so.

This isn't related to GC tribunal cases directly, but I was involved in a case where a senior HR figure ran the dept like her own personal fiefdom. Even forgetting her history, she single-handedly cost the company hundreds of thousands of pounds on this one tribunal. It was only when the CEO stepped in to avoid the whole shit show hitting the papers that she grudgingly was forced into settling.

She kept her role and a few months later she was appointed to the board of an influential HR org (if you know, you know). So this awful, incompetent human was allowed to continue to wreak havoc in her existing role, and to advise on professional standards for her entire industry.

Point being, these people do. not. go. away. They may go underground or reverse-ferret, but they are still there, influencing, whispering in ears.

WooHoo!
I hoped someone was keeping score,well done Prof Phoenix.
Given our organisational capacities I cant help feeling we would be better at running the country.

Yes - but is GI specifically designated as secular or is it only GC/sex realist facts that are so described?

encouraging for those still in the pipeline, like the one to protect single sex facilities at work.

The effect may not be immediately apparent but sometimes tankers take a while to slow or turn. Human resource departments will be taking note.

Because until the late 1990s, nobody anticipated that some givens like sex would need to be defended as a belief rather than a reality. However, relevant legislation meant that Forstater could only be posed on the grounds of a firmly and sincerely held belief, rather than comparable to accepting the existence of gravity.

Secular is used to indicate that it is not a belief that is connected with religious or spiritual matters.

Why is GC couched in terms of being “secular”?
Is GI defined as a religious belief?

Terven Academicals top the league.

Obligatory statement, these wins and settlements are at enormous cost to the central figures, emotionally and financially.

On a slight tangent, I was interested to see Metanoia Institute (James Esses) advertising for a Head of Governance and Compliance. It's something I've noticed after Terven Academical cases…

https://www.metanoia.ac.uk/about/careers-at-metanoia-institute/head-of-governance-and-compliance/

https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-j-esses-v-the-metanoia-institute-and-others-2206164-slash-2021-and-2206708-slash-2021

“The context for these GC discrimination belief wins? last 15 years shows less than 5% belief discrimination claims win at hearing & circa 15-20% are unsuccessful at hearing.“

Up to 5% win.
Up to 20% lose.

What happened with the remaining 75% of belief claims not about GC belief over the last 15 years?

Every part of the public sector seems to need that.

I think there needs to be a more proactive and publicised campaign - much like Stonewall of previous years - an organisation going into / contacting major corporations with the message - here are the stats - are you breaking the law? - how are you supporting your staff to be GC? - we can help you make sure your policies are legal…

not much will happen if HR departments who are already captured are left to work it out on their own

Someone tell the Fox Killer, he might start winning if he backs the right horse for a change.

Or would the success rate go down if he did? He doesn’t seem very good at what he does🤔

Every single case I sent carrots to has led to a win, so I’m at 100% including contributing to Jo.

I haven't read the link, but I’d image the percentage of 78% would be higher as initially when Maya lost it was the thinking back than that if you said a man can never be a woman was “wrong think” but that has changed.

Great to see but so frustrating that all these wins have not resulted in more change in employers policies and culture. If this many wins hasn't done it what will?

People who are fundamentally dishonest and claim to believe contradictory things have a hard time when actually having to answer questions as to why they treat people appallingly.

Brilliant news - not least as more will come forward and the employers will increasingly realise they're being unlawful

The high GC success rate is a pretty damning measure of employers flagrantly breaking the law and the seriousness of the bullying and harassment that claimants have been subjected to. It’s appalling.

Hurray! Nice to have some good news. Thank you for posting!