Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

‘Demure and mindful’ - oh great.

592 replies

LunaNorth · 25/08/2024 10:10

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm23zye08j4o

So this trend. I’m bridling at the ‘demure and mindful’ bullshit being promoted by someone who is performing femininity.

Demure and mindful women seldom make history. Here we go again, being sent back into our boxes by men.

Jools Lebron on Jimmy Kimmel Live

Very demure, very mindful - are we missing joke of Jools Lebron trend?

A demure TikTok has gone viral, but is it an ironic joke or does it set unrealistic standards for women?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm23zye08j4o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
SulkySeagull · 25/08/2024 10:57

It’s a joke. A lot of what they say is demure and mindful absolutely isn’t. It’s a piss take of the whole clean girl aesthetic trend. I think trans people are allowed to make jokes about current trends without being seen as monsters.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/08/2024 10:57

(altho' I've a bad feeling it was 'ur' which I shall ignore).

It was Grin

LunaNorth · 25/08/2024 10:56

It was promoting the idea that women should be ‘demure and mindful’ that pissed me off, especially coming from someone who isn’t female. And the fact that a stupid TikTok trend somehow makes BBC headline news, which suggests that it’s pervading the culture. According to the BBC this summer, we’re either ‘messy brats’ or ‘demure and mindful.’ Neither of which fill me with much joy.

After starting the thread, I see there’s another way to perceive the trend. I’m open to different points of view, which is why I start discussions.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/08/2024 10:56

Yes I was wondering that. If Rachel Dolezal made a "funny"
video about stereotypes about black people I doubt it would go down the same way with the righteous.

StickItInTheFamilyAlbum · 25/08/2024 10:55

Apollo441 · 25/08/2024 10:29

Oh yeah you lot are famed for your humour. How are we to tell what is parody? Rapists in women's prisons, males in women's sports? But just go straight to the hyperbole, why don't you.

Brings to mind the infamous SF, "Enjoy your erasure" (altho' I've a bad feeling it was 'ur' which I shall ignore).

quantumbutterfly · 25/08/2024 10:55

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:51

Then why is it so commonplace to see threads like this? Every time a trans person is on TV, in the media, there's a trans character in a show, etc, a thread pops up here, making up reasons why it's awful that this trans person did whatever normal and mundane thing they did. It's clear there's a significant number of people here who can't see a trans person do anything at all without it making them so furious they have to post about it to people they hope will validate their fury. And that validation is usually found in spades.

You've already got people on this thread talking nonsense about "harm" and "womanface" (as though wearing make up is a fundamental aspect of womanhood)

Edited

Would you defend Rachel Dolezal. If not, why not?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/08/2024 10:54

Then why is it so commonplace to see threads like this?

Why shouldn't people make threads about what they want to? You don't have to read them? In the rest of the site there are thousands of posts commenting on social media influencers for a whole host of reasons, mostly quite critically, about the messages some of them are sending to the women (mostly) following.

DeanElderberry · 25/08/2024 10:54

He is obviously mocking women. He's like the blokes I was in college with more than 40 years ago with their rape jokes and their lesbian jokes and their crude terms for female body parts jokes, and their hilarious dressing up in miniskirts during rag week japes.

The fact that it is not funny, and that it is offensive to and about women, is and was the point - forcing non-consenting women into an unwanted quasi-sexual situation. Women should not be forced to co-exist with people who treat us as comedy fodder.

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:51

LunaNorth · 25/08/2024 10:46

To be fair, one person on FWR. Me. Let’s not treat people as an homogenised mass with a hive mind.

Then why is it so commonplace to see threads like this? Every time a trans person is on TV, in the media, there's a trans character in a show, etc, a thread pops up here, making up reasons why it's awful that this trans person did whatever normal and mundane thing they did. It's clear there's a significant number of people here who can't see a trans person do anything at all without it making them so furious they have to post about it to people they hope will validate their fury. And that validation is usually found in spades.

You've already got people on this thread talking nonsense about "harm" and "womanface" (as though wearing make up is a fundamental aspect of womanhood)

Helleofabore · 25/08/2024 10:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What part of this person being male and mocking female oppressive stereotypes while using female stereotypes to define themselves is to be celebrated?

Is it to be celebrated because it is a person with a transgender identity rather than a male comedian? Is it to be celebrated because it is a person with a transgender identity rather than a drag artist?

And yes, the use of preferred pronouns in the article is one that is also harmful collectively to female people because of how it has been used for other issues. Including prison and sports.

That you can’t acknowledge that is part of the issue.

quantumbutterfly · 25/08/2024 10:47

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:33

She's not mocking women, she's mocking gender norms. I thought "Gender Criticals" were meant to approve of that kind of thing.

Biological realist actually.

LunaNorth · 25/08/2024 10:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

To be fair, one person on FWR. Me. Let’s not treat people as an homogenised mass with a hive mind.

OP posts:
LunaNorth · 25/08/2024 10:44

OppsUpsSide · 25/08/2024 10:41

It’s quite obvious she’s trans from the big picture, neither she nor the article have attempted to hide it.
i haven’t seen any of this trend apart from as exhibited by my daughters who are treating it as a joke - taking the piss out of the trad wife/clean girl aesthetic trends, it’s tongue in cheek a bit annoying sometimes) if anything it’s highlighting those expectations of femininity and laughing at them.
I think you have seen a tiny bit of information and jumped to some quite big conclusions to be honest.

That’s a way of framing it I hadn’t thought of.

OP posts:
VaccineSticker · 25/08/2024 10:43

Regardless of who the speaker is, what’s wrong with encouraging people to dress and act for the occasion and staying classy?
It is not a race to the bottom. Or is it?

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OppsUpsSide · 25/08/2024 10:41

It’s quite obvious she’s trans from the big picture, neither she nor the article have attempted to hide it.
i haven’t seen any of this trend apart from as exhibited by my daughters who are treating it as a joke - taking the piss out of the trad wife/clean girl aesthetic trends, it’s tongue in cheek a bit annoying sometimes) if anything it’s highlighting those expectations of femininity and laughing at them.
I think you have seen a tiny bit of information and jumped to some quite big conclusions to be honest.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/08/2024 10:41

99.9% of Tiktok is a pile of narcissistic, childish, mediocre wank for people with a five second attention span.

<gavel>

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 25/08/2024 10:39

What stereotypes is it making fun of? What exactly is funny about telling women to dress a certain way? I'm gc because I believe in free choice, no one should have any expectations put on them. This is just different expectations.

Helleofabore · 25/08/2024 10:39

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:35

"Harm" ffs. I'm sorry but that's laughable. There is zero harm in someone not realising this person is trans until two thirds into the article. There's zero harm if they never realise at all. What ridiculous hyperbole.

Edited

Yes. We get that you don’t understand the harm. And you don’t understand the misogyny that is clear to many others.

We get it. You find humour in things that others find harmful.

00BonneMaman00 · 25/08/2024 10:38

quantumbutterfly
Someone in woman face mocking woman....how unusual.

She's not mocking women, she's mocking gender norms. I thought "Gender Criticals" were meant to approve of that kind of thing.

🙄🙄🙄

@FreedomDogs that male person is perpetuating sexist stereotypes in pretending to be like a "woman" by performing a sexist interpretation of what our misogynistic society thinks women "do"

ItsNotUnusualToBe · 25/08/2024 10:38

Demure and mindful? Fuck that shit.

Helleofabore · 25/08/2024 10:37

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:33

She's not mocking women, she's mocking gender norms. I thought "Gender Criticals" were meant to approve of that kind of thing.

That male person is mocking female sex stereotypes. Not ‘gender stereotypes’. That is forced teaming right there for that male to claim to be a victim of the same oppression axis that female people have been dealing with the millennia.

They are mocking them in more ways than one.

longdistanceclaraclara · 25/08/2024 10:36

The bigger issue is that it's news. It's August bank holiday, there are probably interns running the show.

00BonneMaman00 · 25/08/2024 10:35

Such a load of bollocks.
Honestly our "culture" is currently so ridiculous.

FreedomDogs · 25/08/2024 10:35

Helleofabore · 25/08/2024 10:33

And again the article linked shows the harm of using preferred pronouns. That this person is male is not mentioned until further in the article which many will not read. So that the real story will not be understood unless this person is known to the audience reading the article.

Because for those who don’t read it carefully, this will appear to be a female tiktokker who is bravely mocking sex stereotypes that have negatively impacted them. When the reality is that this is a male mocking female stereotypes while using those stereotypes to declare to be their personal conceptualisation of what being female is. Which is misogynistic to me.

"Harm" ffs. I'm sorry but that's laughable. There is zero harm in someone not realising this person is trans until two thirds into the article. There's zero harm if they never realise at all. What ridiculous hyperbole.