And yet, the IBA tested twice. They stated very clearly that these boxers were male.
“It is not dishonest to acknowledge this lack of knowledge.”
“It is dishonest to draw conclusions when you do not have the requisite knowledge.”
You can keep doubling down on there being no evidence, but it really isn’t convincing. The evidence is there. You, personally, are choosing to ignore it. I believe that fits the description of ‘dishonest’.
Whether you ignore it or not, doesn’t mean they are not accurate tests.
And also there is the tests mentioned by the coach done by a named endocrinologist. Want to deny that happened as well?
And, you declared that a reason that a person didn’t start menstruating was due to intense sport. Whether I say ‘suggest’ or ‘declare’, it refers to you making that statement.
You have agreed you made the statement.
I don’t agree that my pointing out the false premise of your statement was me lying.