A great description from Dr Hilton
https://x.com/fondofbeetles/status/1823325132435210346?s=46&t=HTxp6zCd4GZ2FFv4a-YeQ
There is a massive sticking point with understandings of DSDs and it’s this.
When a person carries a mutation in a gene that is needed for, say, eye development, they may be born with an eye that is small, has structural defects, and/or doesn’t work properly.
They don’t grow an ear in its place.
When a male carries a mutation in a gene that is needed for penis growth, he may well grow a penis that is small, has structural defects and/or doesn’t work properly.
But the nature of genital development in the embryo means that sometimes, he can grow something else instead. And it’s something that we consider a perfectly regular anatomical part of another group of people.
So people, unconsciously perhaps, flip their frameworks. No longer is this is a male who carries a mutation that means his penis didn’t grow properly, this is, in fact, a female, and it’s everything else about that body - all the other stuff that is routinely and boringly male - that must be considered the “mutation”. The Y chromosome is a mutation? Testes development is an anomaly? The prostate and the seminal glands are anomalies? Being able to father children with sperm is some kind of mad, freaky physical process?
This makes no sense. This is how we get “female testes”. And possibly an eye-ear spectrum of sensory organs 😂
And further, nobody would argue against anyone saying, “OK, it’s an ear, but there should have been an eye there.” We all know that humans don’t grow ears where their eyes are supposed to be.
Some thoughts.