This wouldn't be so offensive if in society generally, the Disabled community weren't one of the most overlooked, underfunded and discriminated against.
One of the reasons so much EDI focuses on TQIA+ is because it costs pennies to stick up a progress flag decal or change a company header on social media. Whereas including disabled people actually costs significant amounts of money because it usually involves making changes to building design. I took my son to see a special school recently. My mum couldn't get in the building as they had absolutely no wheelchair access (old Victorian building) but there were posters everywhere for the LGBTQIA+ society. One costs pennies and the other involves money on structural changes.
Who were the main group the Tories targeted in their 'back to work' drive before the election? Yep, PIP and ESA claimants. Who are negatively affected by Pride Crossings? Anyone who relies on a guide dog or assistance dog.
Who are affected by public toilets not having hoists or proper adult changing stations? Or by the repurposing of disabled toilets? Anyone with a physical or hidden disability.
Who are still discriminated against in employment by employers who don't want to spend money on reasonable adjustments? Why are schools exempt from making reasonable adjustments for disabled pupils if the LEA is able to argue it can't affordable to make them?
But it's okay. We're included on a flag that was supposed to already represent us. And everyone knows that the most important thing about inclusion is being seen to make the right noises, not actually including the disabled.
Although that said, having a nice disabled heart on the progress flag is a sure fire way to bat away criticism of all the autistic kids caught up in the TQIA+ and all the kids on puberty blockers who are now living with crippling osteoporosis and shuffling along the pride marches with walking sticks or in wheelchairs.