She doesn't actually set out a coherent argument though, it's all just waffle and hyperbole. For me, that's where the value of this article lies, I can't imagine anyone reading this will be convinced that she is acting in the best interest of anybody other than herself. You could pick every single thing she says apart without breaking sweat. She is either utterly ruthless or utterly deluded.
"Webberley said: “Everybody’s vulnerable if they need something — so we’re not targeting a vulnerable population. My personal life, my professional life, has been sacrificed to help this community.”
This is lacking even the most basic logic.
"Webberley also claimed that the Cass review would have already led to deaths in the transgender community."
She provides no evidence for this claim.
"Webberley said: “She (Cass) read a different set of papers and research papers to the world’s medical experts in transgender health. It’s completely stymied our children’s service.”
Where are these papers? Give us some links.