Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Did Keir Starmer just say

317 replies

Helpuschoose · 18/06/2024 09:31

To Nick Ferrari on LBC that transwomen with a GRC will not be allowed in female single-sex spaces? It sounded like it. Is this a clear move or does it still leave wriggle-room? I’m not sure.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Greaterorlesser · 18/06/2024 13:45

ResisterRex · 18/06/2024 10:00

The caller challenged him, saying GRCs "don't change reality, so the two policies don't match". And she talked about single sex spaces and how they're currently being invaded (she gave examples)

NF put that to him - that they don't match. He responded "well I think they do because I think you can always say - and should always say - safe spaces for women and girls, whether that's um in sports for sports bodies, whether that's I'm in the work I did, particularly in the support refuges and other places for those that have been subjected to violence um, physical or sexual - very very important that we preserve that. Um - or indeed in our hospitals - it's actually NHS policy for wards to be single sex and er the only reason that isn't routinely the case now is because the government's lost control of our hospitals but that is the policy and we want to reinforce and protect that"

NF then said "so if I was identifying as a woman...would I be allowed to be on a women's ward?"

Starmer says "No" and then NF asks what about if I had a GRC? And he says "you would be accommodated but not on a woman's ward" NF asks where he would go. Starmer says "well hospitals already do this, there are ways it can be done".

NF asks how. Starmer says "well lots of them have side rooms, that sort of thing". NF: "side room? I'd get a side room?" Starmer goes "Nick, I've spent a lot of time in hospitals, many many wards have the traditional beds laid out...many have side rooms these days for general use and that can be accommodated. But the rule about single sex wards is - [laughing a bit] - or the policy is already there, the only reason that there's any issue these days is because the government's lost control of our hospitals"

So if Starmer truly believes that this isn't happening then why? Who's telling him this? And who's telling him that staff aren't identifying as women, as that didn't feature in his reply either?

And why doesn't he understand that this is about the "need" to be validated by being among women? They won't accept third spaces like side rooms. This has been done to death.

Annex A also featuring nowhere in his thoughts. Has he really been in a lot of hospitals? Last one I was in did have what might be cast a "side room" but definitely was not and was in use for other things required for the ward.

So a trans woman would be put in a side room of a men’s ward? Thus using the men’s bathroom and shower? Or the women’s ward?

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 13:39

theilltemperedclavecinist · 18/06/2024 13:34

NHS will have to change its process for recording gender reassignment to retain a birth sex marker. It was crazy not doing that from the medical POV alone.

Yes. Without this crucial step, Starmer's promise is meaningless. And we'd also need to ensure that a GRC didn't change that sex marker.

MummBRaaarrrTheEverLeaking · 18/06/2024 13:38

seXX · 18/06/2024 11:59

DrNickedMaCorpus · Today 11:46
If a GRC changes sex then how can a hospital exclude? The NHS record on self ID

Exactly this, people can and do change their sex marker on their NHS record without a GRC, same with passport. So hospitals can say they maintain single sex wards because on paper they do. We end up with the awful situation of the woman who was raped on a ward then told it didn't happen as there were no men there.

If you change the meaning of words, then words have no meaning.

Just saw this:

He is bloody Captain Flip Flop.

And the result of that is now I wouldn't trust him as far as I can throw him.

Datun · 18/06/2024 13:34

MrsOvertonsWindow · 18/06/2024 13:32

Fascinating discussion - highlighting what a mess it all is and what an impossible situation labour find themselves in by having signed up to transactivism in the first place.
It of course speaks to a lack of ethics, lack of critical thinking and embedded misogyny that they tossed away women's rights and the need for children to be safeguarded in favour of rainbow flags and drag queens.

It does. And I bet you anything you like, they wish they'd never started it.

theilltemperedclavecinist · 18/06/2024 13:34

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 12:51

And how is that possible in practice?

NHS will have to change its process for recording gender reassignment to retain a birth sex marker. It was crazy not doing that from the medical POV alone.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 18/06/2024 13:32

Fascinating discussion - highlighting what a mess it all is and what an impossible situation labour find themselves in by having signed up to transactivism in the first place.
It of course speaks to a lack of ethics, lack of critical thinking and embedded misogyny that they tossed away women's rights and the need for children to be safeguarded in favour of rainbow flags and drag queens.

flyingbuttress43 · 18/06/2024 13:27

The problem with option B is you can only protect women's rights if you know what a woman is. Labour don't.

ZeldaFighter · 18/06/2024 13:05

Apologies if this has already been raised, I haven't RTFT.

Labour's problem with women's rights issues is the same as Brexit - a choice they don't want to make:
Option A - follow the TRA lead, be seen by many younger voters as "progressive" and definitely not Tories and lose votes from women
Option B: protect women's rights and sound like the Tories and appear socially conservative to progressive and/or younger voters

It's a Lose-Lose for Labour which is of course why the Tories have discovered its importance during election season (and not during the last 14 years when they could have legislated about it.)

I personally think Labour will follow Option B if they gain power and they have my vote. Everyone will suffer from more Tory rule.

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 12:57

timenowplease · 18/06/2024 12:54

Doesn't matter what he says. I don't believe a word of it. He's a weasel.

What's most annoying is his petulant atte mpt to suggest his position had never changed.

I think Labour need to own how badly they've fucked up, from the dreadful slapdash EA, the frankly insane GRA, to expelling women who have tried to raise matters.

Never apologise, never explain is for jokes, not politics.

And it needs to be Starmer, not his kite flier Wes Streeting.

timenowplease · 18/06/2024 12:54

Helpuschoose · 18/06/2024 09:31

To Nick Ferrari on LBC that transwomen with a GRC will not be allowed in female single-sex spaces? It sounded like it. Is this a clear move or does it still leave wriggle-room? I’m not sure.

Doesn't matter what he says. I don't believe a word of it. He's a weasel.

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 12:51

theilltemperedclavecinist · 18/06/2024 12:44

He was talking about keeping a ward single sex by excluding men with a GRC. It's impossible to construe that as sex=legal sex.

And how is that possible in practice?

theilltemperedclavecinist · 18/06/2024 12:44

Thelnebriati · 18/06/2024 12:08

He's a lawyer and knows the difference between 'single sex exemption' and 'women's safe space'. If he's using the latter, its deliberate.

He was talking about keeping a ward single sex by excluding men with a GRC. It's impossible to construe that as sex=legal sex.

ResisterRex · 18/06/2024 12:37

RedToothBrush · 18/06/2024 12:29

Single sex accomodation in hospitals was supposed to be introduced when exactly? Its not something thats wholly a 'Tory thing'. Many of our hospitals were built and planned using PFI prior to this government and were not designed in a way that was frankly fit for purpose even then.

Hospitals can't manage single sex accomodation as it is. They are allowed to 'make exceptions' all the time over it.

So the trans stuff, is often irrelevant because single sex provision is deemed such a low priority as an issue to begin with.

Its a put up or shut up mentality with that too.

I was sure there were older articles than I found. Just found this but the site is not an official Labour Party site and it does state that:

"As part of our concern to ensure quality, we will work towards the elimination of mixed-sex wards"

www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml

I also found this, with extracts of the manifesto and it seems to match although no, I have not checked every single item.

publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldselect/ldprivi/106i/106i13.htm

Anyway the first link might provide more of the history.

Thelnebriati · 18/06/2024 12:34

Single-sex wards in the NHS 'now the norm' Published 18 August 2011

The definition is much looser than we'd like. It can be a single sex bay on a mixed sex ward, with the toilets allocated for either men or women.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-14573155

BBC News

Single-sex wards in the NHS 'now the norm'

Further falls in the number of patients kept on mixed-sex wards has prompted ministers to suggest single-sex accommodation is now the norm in the NHS in England.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-14573155

RedToothBrush · 18/06/2024 12:29

Single sex accomodation in hospitals was supposed to be introduced when exactly? Its not something thats wholly a 'Tory thing'. Many of our hospitals were built and planned using PFI prior to this government and were not designed in a way that was frankly fit for purpose even then.

Hospitals can't manage single sex accomodation as it is. They are allowed to 'make exceptions' all the time over it.

So the trans stuff, is often irrelevant because single sex provision is deemed such a low priority as an issue to begin with.

Its a put up or shut up mentality with that too.

RedToothBrush · 18/06/2024 12:24

Thelnebriati · 18/06/2024 12:08

He's a lawyer and knows the difference between 'single sex exemption' and 'women's safe space'. If he's using the latter, its deliberate.

He's not just any lawyer.

He's a lawyer who specialised in Human Rights.

Can we keep our eyes on this please. This is supposedly his specialist area.

Keeptoiletssafe · 18/06/2024 12:15

Citrusandginger · 18/06/2024 10:20

Harumphh. Side rooms should be allocated on the basis of clinical need. You know for people with infections, at risk of infections, or people at the end of life.

Are trans people going to be given priority?

I would also say allocation due to safety. Side rooms don’t offer the visuals like a ward does. So it could be dangerous to put a patient in a side room. In my experience, staff are often rushed off their feet and are relying on other patients and visitors to flag up concerns. Last time I was in hospital I was filling up the water jugs of other patients because I was the one not bed-bound.

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 12:12

Thelnebriati · 18/06/2024 12:08

He's a lawyer and knows the difference between 'single sex exemption' and 'women's safe space'. If he's using the latter, its deliberate.

Yep.

Noting also that 'It's really important' seems to be a phrase that both Streeting and Starmer have decided to adopt this week - I assume after the farce of last week's 'fuck it we don't care' approach to women's rights, dismissal of concerns as 'culture wars', and having to rein in Cashman, etc.

'The consensus among women is that we don't give a shit, Wes!'
'It's cool, Keir, tell them it's really important, they'll buy it'.

Thelnebriati · 18/06/2024 12:08

He's a lawyer and knows the difference between 'single sex exemption' and 'women's safe space'. If he's using the latter, its deliberate.

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 12:06

Riding two horses is totally deliberate.

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 12:06

Imnobody4 · 18/06/2024 12:00

ResisterRex
Totally agree. If you watch the full interview there's a lot of heartfelt good intentions but still riding two horses at the same time. It's frustrating.

'Heartfelt' is not what you get when running a very well funded, researched political campaign, I'm sorry. You get 'focus grouped', 'advised', and 'carefully worded'.

Imnobody4 · 18/06/2024 12:00

ResisterRex
Totally agree. If you watch the full interview there's a lot of heartfelt good intentions but still riding two horses at the same time. It's frustrating.

TWETMIRF · 18/06/2024 12:00

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 18/06/2024 10:52

Should ask him if he's going to make it clear to girl guides that their current position isn't actually legal and they need to refuse admittance to transgirls and transwomen

It's ridiculous that we allow girls that identify as girls, girls that don't identify as girls and boys that identify as girls but not other boys. HQ claims that we are now a single gender organisation but as we (rightly) don't kick out the girls that think they're boys, how on earth do they manage to say this with a straight face?

seXX · 18/06/2024 11:59

DrNickedMaCorpus · Today 11:46
If a GRC changes sex then how can a hospital exclude? The NHS record on self ID

Exactly this, people can and do change their sex marker on their NHS record without a GRC, same with passport. So hospitals can say they maintain single sex wards because on paper they do. We end up with the awful situation of the woman who was raped on a ward then told it didn't happen as there were no men there.

If you change the meaning of words, then words have no meaning.

Just saw this:

Dominic Frisby sings "Keir Starmer is Captain Flip Flop"

Hilarious satirical songSubscribe to my comedy newsletter: https://www.frisbys.news/Directed by Will Freeman with music recorded, mixed and played by Wayne M...

https://youtu.be/CvP0Turzy7g?si=xz44VN0W_NcZ9p5U

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 18/06/2024 11:58

Also I don't know whether Keir has noticed but the NHS is on its knees.

It's difficult enough to get a bed in the correct sex bay, let alone ward. Let alone a bloody side room! How are bed managers, ward managers and nurses at the sharp end supposed to police this when the government won't give them clear guidance and tries to gaslight everyone about what is happening? How are they supposed to refuse an aggy TW who is insisting on a side room because Keir said so?

The current laws are clear as mud and being misinterpreted all over the place.

The problem isn't solved by saying 'the law is clear'.Stonewall version of law has been adopted all across public services and this will only change with strong top down leadership.