Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

LGB Alliance starts Helpline for teens and young adults

293 replies

IwantToRetire · 18/06/2024 00:09

This isn't a specifically for women, lesbians but aimed at young people who are feeling confused or bullied whilst trying to work out who they are. Thought some on FWR might have siblings, children, who might find this useful.

Q: Why did you select the age range 13 – 24?

Adolescence is often a time of turmoil and change and teenagers can struggle as they begin to think about who they are.

Whilst acting on any sense of same-sex attraction may be years away, the worries and fears associated with the idea that you are ‘different’ often start early.

Young adults, on the other hand, may be more settled in their sexual orientation but struggling with a new world of relationships.

Whilst the support would be framed differently and always in an age appropriate manner, the underlying message from our volunteers will be meaningful to all teens and young adults – it’s always fine to be you.

Q: How is it different to any other service?

Like other helplines, we’ll be there to support teens and young adults facing a whole host of issues – ranging from coming out and bullying to break-ups and family alienation.

What makes us unique is that the service won’t suggest to a teenage girl who feels different, because she prefers short hair and playing sport, that she might really be a boy. And it won’t tell a teenage boy who is being bullied for being effeminate that maybe he’s really a girl.

Many young adults report being shamed for their lesbian, gay or bisexual relationships by those who would say that same-sex attraction is in some way bigoted. We start from the premise that homosexuality is perfectly natural.

There is much more info about safeguarding and how volunteers were recruited on this web page https://lgballiance.org.uk/our-helpline-is-open/

Our helpline is open! - LGB Alliance UK

https://lgballiance.org.uk/our-helpline-is-open

OP posts:
AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 08:28

Alwaystired94 · 19/06/2024 08:15

they may have been doubt they'd release any of it though, why bother? They are aware of how some see them, much like charities like Mermaids know how some view them and know they will receive abuse and threatening behaviour.

Shame we have so many despicable human beings in the world who believe violence and intimidation are ever ok.

I doubt it will be released, more used in a police investigation.

AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 08:27

ThreeWordHarpy · 19/06/2024 08:17

I really thought we’d long got past the idea that sexuality means sexual acts. And that someone talking about their sexuality means they’ll be talking about sex. Maybe because I’m old and I remember homophobes shuddering at the idea of two men engaging in anal sex, which is where their mind leapt to with the idea of two men in a relationship. And the counter argument was that most people didn’t go to a straight wedding and spent the entire time wondering what the bride and groom would be doing in bed on their wedding night. Do straight people only know their sexuality on the occasion they lose our virginity? How do they know who to have sex with in the first place?

Surely sexuality is a descriptor of the sex class one is attracted to, who forms the target of our romantic and sexual desires. And as it is perfectly normal for 13-15 year olds to be having romantic and sexual desires then it seems appropriate for them to say they are L, G or B if that is the case. Whether they are acting on those desires or not.

i have no problem with a helpline offering services to a 13-24 year old cohort, providing so the volunteers are trained to respond appropriately to the different needs of the younger and older callers, which it seems is the case. As has been said, it’s a discreet 1:1 discussion with a trained volunteer to provide assurance and signpost help for teenagers and young adults, not an invite to a big social gathering.

Edited

I know that. But LGB Alliance get jumped on for literally breathing so if they said something as simple as LGB Kids they'd get crucified.

ThreeWordHarpy · 19/06/2024 08:17

AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 06:24

Sex is illegal before the age of consent. Or is supposed to be.

Therefore there can not be LGB children, but children who grow up to be LGB.

I really thought we’d long got past the idea that sexuality means sexual acts. And that someone talking about their sexuality means they’ll be talking about sex. Maybe because I’m old and I remember homophobes shuddering at the idea of two men engaging in anal sex, which is where their mind leapt to with the idea of two men in a relationship. And the counter argument was that most people didn’t go to a straight wedding and spent the entire time wondering what the bride and groom would be doing in bed on their wedding night. Do straight people only know their sexuality on the occasion they lose our virginity? How do they know who to have sex with in the first place?

Surely sexuality is a descriptor of the sex class one is attracted to, who forms the target of our romantic and sexual desires. And as it is perfectly normal for 13-15 year olds to be having romantic and sexual desires then it seems appropriate for them to say they are L, G or B if that is the case. Whether they are acting on those desires or not.

i have no problem with a helpline offering services to a 13-24 year old cohort, providing so the volunteers are trained to respond appropriately to the different needs of the younger and older callers, which it seems is the case. As has been said, it’s a discreet 1:1 discussion with a trained volunteer to provide assurance and signpost help for teenagers and young adults, not an invite to a big social gathering.

Alwaystired94 · 19/06/2024 08:15

AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 08:11

I imagine they have all been recorded.

I'm surprised they only got 78.

they may have been doubt they'd release any of it though, why bother? They are aware of how some see them, much like charities like Mermaids know how some view them and know they will receive abuse and threatening behaviour.

Shame we have so many despicable human beings in the world who believe violence and intimidation are ever ok.

AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 08:11

Alwaystired94 · 19/06/2024 08:08

do we take everything people say as truth?

if this was a trans charity who said this, most on here would scoff that it wasn't true. both ends of the spectrum have nutters who just want an excuse to be a terrible human being.

I imagine they have all been recorded.

I'm surprised they only got 78.

Alwaystired94 · 19/06/2024 08:08

Redshoeblueshoe · 18/06/2024 20:42

The LGB Alliance has just posted on Twitter (yes I know I need to work out how to do links) they have had 78 abusive and threatening calls, threats of rape and violence, in 3 hours

do we take everything people say as truth?

if this was a trans charity who said this, most on here would scoff that it wasn't true. both ends of the spectrum have nutters who just want an excuse to be a terrible human being.

AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 06:30

I think that the service should definitely be split, and you have to be very, very careful about offering a service like this to children.

Not that it isn't needed, goodness knows kids need something and someone to talk to as they aren't getting it from schools.

But just triaging on self identified age really worries me.

AlisonDonut · 19/06/2024 06:24

Flareware · 18/06/2024 20:10

This was posted earlier, from the Mermaids v LGBA court case.

Sex is illegal before the age of consent. Or is supposed to be.

Therefore there can not be LGB children, but children who grow up to be LGB.

ThreeWordHarpy · 19/06/2024 00:49

And I expect lots of under age callers will want to talk about the sec part

really? Do you really think young teens want to talk in graphic detail about their sexual experiences and desires, what they did or didn’t do, or what they want to do? To an adult stranger? I don’t think anyone I ever knew at that age would have done that, regardless of sexuality.

Or do you not think it more likely that young people struggling to come to terms with same sex attraction want the opportunity to talk in general terms about their feelings about who they are attracted to and what their desires mean? And get assurances that this is perfectly ok?

IwantToRetire · 19/06/2024 00:36

Just came to post a link to a video in which Kate Barker talks about what the volunteer experienced during the first session of what should have been them support teens and young adults.

So depressing.

If you are not on facebook you can just dismsiss the sign box (X in top right hand corner) and video should play. https://fb.watch/sNQ0wJxEW7/

Its unclear from what she says who is making the calls or what is motivating them, as likely to be homophobes as any TRAs thinking they can intimidate LGB Alliance.

The idea that somehow the issue about biological sex being a reality has calmed down is clearly not the situation. And certainly not for those on the front line.

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 19/06/2024 00:30

fedupandstuck · 18/06/2024 20:34

Your reading comprehension is poor if you think that the quote you've posted supports what you're claiming,

The quote is making a subtle point, to distinguish between "LGB children" and being LGB as a child.

Thanks

OP posts:
MsGrumpytrousers · 18/06/2024 23:02

izimbra · 18/06/2024 21:25

"Why would a charity helping young people attract such vitriol, other than because of genderism's deep seated homophobia"

🙄

Transgender people are homophobic? What, all of them? Some of them? A few of them? What's that opinion based on?

It's based on a knowledge of gender ideology, which trans activists support though not everyone who identifies as trans does.

PurpleBugz · 18/06/2024 22:42

I think the safeguarding will be difficult to get right but should not be a reason not to open a helpline.

Letting a kid talk about how they feel and work out if they might be LGB needs to be done without actually talking about the sex part of being LGB. Because talking about sex with children is wrong one on one like this. And I expect lots of under age callers will want to talk about the sec part. I was a young teen experimenting with a girl and confused because I liked boys too. Now I know I'm Bi but as a young teen would have really appreciated a helpline to call to be told it doesn't matter I don't have to make a decision if I'm lesbian or straight just yet and by the way bisexual exists sounds like you don't know that. But they would have to have that conversation with such young people without allowing them to discuss what they may have been doing with others while they experiment and in a way that doesn't shut the young person down and feel like their sexuality is shameful. Very very hard task on the hands of the volunteers there- they will need some amazing training. And I imagine some amazing support as they are going to hear some difficult stuff from the people they want to support in addition to the violent threats they are already getting!!

I think the point about there are not LGB children is that children should not be sexually active? And shouldn't have things discussed with them in a way that normalises being sexually active under age. But they most definitely exist and will be realising they are not strait even if not sexually active yet they will be finding people attractive.

Maybe they should have a blanket policy they don't discuss the details of sexual acts with those old enough to be engaging in it. As I'm not sure it's really appropriate to talk the details. They need to be told it's ok and not shameful without needing to give details. But then how can they be safeguarded from abuse if they haven't given details? 🤔.

I do also think avoiding talking the explicit details is wise or they are going to have pervs calling making shit up who get a kick out of saying outrageous things. Maybe not even made up stuff but they are getting their thrills out of talking about it. If they have a policy not to allow details to be spoken about they could avoid some of that.

It's absolutely a needed service. I would have benefited from it massively I know that. I'm happy to read they are open to feedback as I think they will have some real challenges getting this right

Maaate · 18/06/2024 21:50

izimbra · 18/06/2024 21:25

"Why would a charity helping young people attract such vitriol, other than because of genderism's deep seated homophobia"

🙄

Transgender people are homophobic? What, all of them? Some of them? A few of them? What's that opinion based on?

Bit revealing that you went straight to talking about trans people there...

izimbra · 18/06/2024 21:25

"Why would a charity helping young people attract such vitriol, other than because of genderism's deep seated homophobia"

🙄

Transgender people are homophobic? What, all of them? Some of them? A few of them? What's that opinion based on?

terryleather · 18/06/2024 21:10

DrSpartacular · 18/06/2024 19:04

As Safe Schools Alliance point out in replies, the grouping together of children and adults into the group 'young people' represents a safeguarding concern. 13-24 year olds are not a peer group, under-18s are children, and it's important to remember that in any safeguarding context, which a helpline for discussing sexual orientation, sexuality and sex absolutely is.

What she said 👆🏻

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 20:50

Redshoeblueshoe · 18/06/2024 20:42

The LGB Alliance has just posted on Twitter (yes I know I need to work out how to do links) they have had 78 abusive and threatening calls, threats of rape and violence, in 3 hours

Grim.

But reveals that how seriously needed and important their presence is.

Why would a charity helping young people attract such vitriol, other than because of genderism's deep seated homophobia?

Theeyeballsinthesky · 18/06/2024 20:47

I know thread has moved on but just wanted to say that They are far from the only organisation providing services to young ppl categorised as between 13-25. Off the record work with young people aged 11-25 https://www.otrbristol.org.uk/

Redshoeblueshoe · 18/06/2024 20:42

The LGB Alliance has just posted on Twitter (yes I know I need to work out how to do links) they have had 78 abusive and threatening calls, threats of rape and violence, in 3 hours

fedupandstuck · 18/06/2024 20:34

Your reading comprehension is poor if you think that the quote you've posted supports what you're claiming,

The quote is making a subtle point, to distinguish between "LGB children" and being LGB as a child.

Flareware · 18/06/2024 20:10

IwantToRetire · 18/06/2024 19:01

Well I've read the thread and haven't seen any evidence of this being the position of LGB Alliance.

This was posted earlier, from the Mermaids v LGBA court case.

LGB Alliance starts Helpline for teens and young adults
Flareware · 18/06/2024 20:04

CaptainOliviaBenson · 18/06/2024 18:26

What do you mean LGB doesn't think LGB kids exist? Most LGB people know they're gay/bi in their teens.

It's Kate Harris, co-founder of LGB Alliance who's saying LGB kids don't exist.

DrSpartacular · 18/06/2024 19:50

IwantToRetire · 18/06/2024 19:30

Again if you read the actual web page you will see they make a distinction.

Why are so many continuing to post without having read the actual description.? Confused

I have read the description.

I have explained my concern, which aligns with Allison Bailey's and SSA's concern.

Re-defining children as 'young people' is problematic.

DrNickedMaCorpus · 18/06/2024 19:37

I've read the description, and LGBA's page, and the point about separating children from adults makes sense.

I'm sure this has the potential to be a really useful service, and they need to hold safeguarding at the forefront.

IwantToRetire · 18/06/2024 19:30

DrSpartacular · 18/06/2024 19:04

As Safe Schools Alliance point out in replies, the grouping together of children and adults into the group 'young people' represents a safeguarding concern. 13-24 year olds are not a peer group, under-18s are children, and it's important to remember that in any safeguarding context, which a helpline for discussing sexual orientation, sexuality and sex absolutely is.

Again if you read the actual web page you will see they make a distinction.

Why are so many continuing to post without having read the actual description.? Confused

OP posts: