Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

To those who consider prostitution rape...

644 replies

Ahsoka2001 · 09/06/2024 21:31

I recently found some old MN threads where posters debated whether a man who has sex with a prostitute commits rape. Those in favour argued that the woman's consent is not freely given - it is conditional on the basis money is exchanged and consent cannot be bought -

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/3012135-Is-prostitution-rape

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/2791778-does-having-sex-with-a-prostitute-constitute-rape

To those who agree with this position, I'm wondering where exactly do we draw the line? If all prostitution is rape, then -

a) What about female pornstars? They only have sex on camera on the condition that they are paid for the shoot. Does this mean every male pornstar in history is a rapist because the woman's consent was bought and not freely given?

b) What about mainstream/narrative cinema actresses? If a female Hollywood star only consents to a sex scene on the condition of receiving a paycheck for the role, does that mean they're being sexually assaulted when they perform a scene in which they're kissed/touched sexually? Does this mean male Hollywood actors who partake in these scenes are sexual assaulters?

...Surely not! But again, if all prostitution automatically equals rape, then how and where do we draw the line?

Is prostitution rape? | Mumsnet

I've seen posters referring to prostitution as rape on here and I am interested to hear the reasoning. I am undecided on the issue as I have not r...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/3012135-Is-prostitution-rape

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Dervel · 24/06/2024 01:22

XChrome sorry I quoted you in my response to laidback I misclicked something.

XChrome · 23/06/2024 20:15

Dervel · 23/06/2024 19:35

@Laidbackguy any response to your error of confusing transactional and reciprocal?

Edited

🦗

Dervel · 23/06/2024 19:35

XChrome · 23/06/2024 15:53

Well there's solid proof, then. Your friends say so, which makes it fact. 🙄

@Laidbackguy any response to your error of confusing transactional and reciprocal?

XChrome · 23/06/2024 15:54

biscuitandcake · 23/06/2024 09:13

Its like my then 4 year old stropping of to their room to sulk over something. If you ignored it, then after about 5 minutes you'd hear "I'm Not talking to you" shouted from his room. If you still left it, he would return to the living room to tell you in person that he wasn't talking to any of you ever again. (He grew out of it).

😄 Exactly.

XChrome · 23/06/2024 15:53

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:16

This is exactly how it works in the majority of heterosexual relationships. I know this because it’s a gripe I hear time after time from make friends and colleges.

Well there's solid proof, then. Your friends say so, which makes it fact. 🙄

XChrome · 23/06/2024 15:51

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:26

Transactional would imply an expectation that if I do a, b &, c you’ll do e, f & g. Transactions don’t need to involve goods.

All relationships work in this way, if you feel you’re giving noticeably more to a partner than you get from them you’re not going to hang around.

Yes, every relationship is give and take. That does not mean it is transactional. In a healthy relationship, you give because you care about the person, not just because you expect to get something out of it. However, if one person is doing most of the giving and the other merely takes, it's not a healthy relationship. There needs to be a balance.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 23/06/2024 14:42

CassieMaddox · 23/06/2024 13:01

I think that says more about the psyche of your college friends tbh
Maybe when you've all grown up and had proper girlfriends your attitudes will change.

I think college was a typo for colleagues. I don't know but even if his male friends and colleagues were such unreconstructed chauvinists to talk with each other in this way, one might have expected more of the boastful "she can't get enough of me, I'm so good at" blathering than the pitiful admission that their partners won't put out unless they get something in return.

CassieMaddox · 23/06/2024 13:01

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:16

This is exactly how it works in the majority of heterosexual relationships. I know this because it’s a gripe I hear time after time from make friends and colleges.

I think that says more about the psyche of your college friends tbh
Maybe when you've all grown up and had proper girlfriends your attitudes will change.

Dervel · 23/06/2024 12:01

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 09:13

Is a discussion in an echo chamber ever useful? Surly if you want a sensible debate you want to hear all ideas and the bad ones don’t stand up to scrutiny?

Nope it is not, but this is not an echo chamber. What do you mean by a “sensible” debate? If you wish to have a productive debate you probably don’t have the resource of time to entertain literally every idea. A bad idea particularly presented with strong rhetoric can bog down a discussion, several of them can render the endeavour completely fruitless.

Whilst it’s true having a few people trained in critical thinking, logic & rhetoric can burn through those bad ideas at a fair old pace that skill set is quite rarified nowadays. Particularly in spaces of online discourse.

However go on, please contribute further. I’ve already pointed out to you your error in that you have conflated the concepts of transactional & reciprocal. Would care to address that point?

biscuitandcake · 23/06/2024 09:13

XChrome · 23/06/2024 00:26

The ones who give me the biggest laugh are the MGTOW crowd. They insist they are done with women, yet they never leave us alone in our discussion groups. They are massively lying to themselves. I'd feel sorry for them if they weren't such scum.

Its like my then 4 year old stropping of to their room to sulk over something. If you ignored it, then after about 5 minutes you'd hear "I'm Not talking to you" shouted from his room. If you still left it, he would return to the living room to tell you in person that he wasn't talking to any of you ever again. (He grew out of it).

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 09:13

Dervel · 23/06/2024 09:04

And are you really so fragile that a bunch of women chatting intelligently amongst themselves presents such a massive existential threat to you?

Is a discussion in an echo chamber ever useful? Surly if you want a sensible debate you want to hear all ideas and the bad ones don’t stand up to scrutiny?

Dervel · 23/06/2024 09:04

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:18

Are your ideas so fragile you can’t stand anyone challenging them?

And are you really so fragile that a bunch of women chatting intelligently amongst themselves presents such a massive existential threat to you?

ThatAgileGoldMoose · 23/06/2024 06:49

Ahsoka2001 · 10/06/2024 11:53

But what gives people the right to decide on the sex workers behalf that they’re a rape victim? Assuming they’re an adult and fully capable of consenting (ie not under the influence of drugs or mentally ill etc) then they're capable of deciding that for themselves, surely?

Why are you calling it deciding on their behalf? None of us are frogmarching sexworkers to the police and forcing them to report rapes that they don't believe are rapes.

Everybody is allowed to have an opinion on other people, their actions and what is done to them. Those people may or may not agree with our opinions. So what?

As an not entirely irrelevant aside, I suspect that you are a male poster. Please could you confirm? It would give some context.

Beefcurtains79 · 23/06/2024 06:31

Ahsoka2001 · 10/06/2024 11:38

I absolutely agree but a couple posters on the threads I linked were honestly arguing that it’s rape even if the sex worker doesn’t realise incredibly

But the punters know they aren’t having sex with them because they want to, don’t they?
So what does that make them?

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:26

XChrome · 22/06/2024 21:46

A transaction is an exchange of goods for services. If both people want sex, for whatever reason, and are able to freely consent, it is not a transaction.

Transactional would imply an expectation that if I do a, b &, c you’ll do e, f & g. Transactions don’t need to involve goods.

All relationships work in this way, if you feel you’re giving noticeably more to a partner than you get from them you’re not going to hang around.

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:18

BouquetGarni224 · 23/06/2024 00:07

When will the incels ever get the fuck off this site.

Are your ideas so fragile you can’t stand anyone challenging them?

Laidbackguy · 23/06/2024 06:16

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 22/06/2024 23:14

I almost feel sorry for you. That really isn't how it works.

This is exactly how it works in the majority of heterosexual relationships. I know this because it’s a gripe I hear time after time from make friends and colleges.

XChrome · 23/06/2024 00:26

BouquetGarni224 · 23/06/2024 00:07

When will the incels ever get the fuck off this site.

The ones who give me the biggest laugh are the MGTOW crowd. They insist they are done with women, yet they never leave us alone in our discussion groups. They are massively lying to themselves. I'd feel sorry for them if they weren't such scum.

BouquetGarni224 · 23/06/2024 00:07

When will the incels ever get the fuck off this site.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 22/06/2024 23:14

Laidbackguy · 22/06/2024 18:54

Because typically a man has to do something for her to feel he should be rewarded with it?

I almost feel sorry for you. That really isn't how it works.

HappierTimesAhead · 22/06/2024 22:10

XChrome · 22/06/2024 22:07

Bullshit. Couples in healthy relationships agree on it mutually, and if one of them does not want it at that particular time, they wait until it can be mutually enjoyable.

I'm getting incel vibes from your posts.

It's definitely heading in that direction

XChrome · 22/06/2024 22:07

Laidbackguy · 22/06/2024 18:21

Do you not think women dictate if/when a couple have sex in most if not all relationships?

Bullshit. Couples in healthy relationships agree on it mutually, and if one of them does not want it at that particular time, they wait until it can be mutually enjoyable.

I'm getting incel vibes from your posts.

XChrome · 22/06/2024 21:58

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 22/06/2024 19:04

If only chappy could empathise with the half of the human species who have the kind of body he finds sexually attractive

if only he could think about how to give pleasure and take pleasure from mutual satisfaction

if only they were real people with the feelings and motivations that real humans have because that would mean he could form healthy, mutually supportive, happy relationships with them

sadly due to women not being actual people all of this is impossible

sad times

Scads of women are't throwing themselves at him and glowing with ecstasy at thirty seconds of inept thrusting, which he has every right to expect them to do. The poor lamb.

XChrome · 22/06/2024 21:53

Grammarnut · 22/06/2024 21:12

I like sex. I always have. The more the better. But my DH died five months ago and now there is no sex. I remember the last time we went to bed, a few days before he had a cardiac arrest, and I miss the sex as much as I miss him. Somehow this never comes up in discussions about grief. Perhaps it's a taboo?

I have never had transactional sex in my life, btw. I rather thought that was called being prostituted.

My condolences on your terrible loss.

XChrome · 22/06/2024 21:51

Laidbackguy · 22/06/2024 18:54

Because typically a man has to do something for her to feel he should be rewarded with it?

Clearly that's what's been happening to you, so you presume it's happening to other men. It should tell you something about what kind of partner you are. Consider stepping up your game.

By "do something" for the woman do you mean be civil and actually talk to her? 😄

Swipe left for the next trending thread