Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Diane Abbott to be banned from standing for Labour

208 replies

IwantToRetire · 28/05/2024 19:00

... Diane Abbott will not be allowed to stand as a Labour candidate in the forthcoming general election, in a move that is likely to end her 37-year career in parliament.

The MP for Hackney North & Stoke Newington — the first black woman elected to parliament — has been suspended from the party since April last year and the Labour leadership has concluded that there are no circumstances in which she will stand under its banner on July 4.

An announcement of the party’s position could come as early as today. There are discussions among senior aides to Sir Keir Starmer about restoring her to the Labour whip before the election to allow her to leave politics “with dignity”.

Last week the Labour leader promised a resolution to the case before June 4, his party’s deadline for candidate selection, which falls three days before the legal close of nominations.

On Tuesday morning the BBC reported that the party’s internal investigation into a letter by Abbott to The Observer, in which she likened the discrimination suffered by Jewish people, the Irish and Travellers to the bullying of redheads, had concluded six months ago, without any update on her status as an election candidate.
Abbott, 70, is said to have been issued with a formal warning by the party and was told to complete an “antisemitism awareness course”. She did so in February, having apologised publicly and withdrawn her remarks.

Sources close to the left-wing MP told the BBC that Labour leadership was deliberately “dragging out the process in order to block her from being a candidate at the election”. It is understood that the decision to exclude her is final and will not change even in the event she issues a further apology. ...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/diane-abbott-mp-labour-general-election-2024-fvgnbprdm

(If this is true, irrespective of the rights and wrongs, that Labour should use such underhand tactics is just disgusting. In other words they could have told her this in February. Can only imagine how they will behave once in Government.)

Can also be read at https://archive.ph/orgiJ

I know there have been other threads but MNHQ search is useless and even searching by google didn't bring them up, except this one which I seem to have started. https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5029371-rally-of-support-for-diane-abbot-in-hackney-called-by-hackney-black-women

Diane Abbott to be banned from standing for Labour

Britain’s first black female MP likely to stand down from parliament after 30 years as party admits inquiry into her suspensions ended months ago

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/diane-abbott-mp-labour-general-election-2024-fvgnbprdm

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
11
IwantToRetire · 06/06/2024 17:54

The Labour Party has abandoned longstanding legal action against five former members of staff who have been accused of "conspiring" against Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership.

The most recent documents presented in open court last autumn showed that Labour had spent £1.5m on legal action, and estimated it would spend nearly £900,000 more.

The party's final costs are likely to be higher, as these figures don’t reflect the full cost of the litigation.

But it’s not clear if the party will meet the costs of those it claimed had leaked the controversial report.

And concerns had been raised privately about pursuing it by some Starmer supporters who were no fans of the Corbyn leadership.

The 860 page leaked document ostensibly examined the handling of antisemitism complaints under Mr Corbyn’s leadership.

But it was a lot more than that.

The report's contention was that anti-Corbyn staffers had impeded progress on antisemitism complaints, and it suggested some of them had diverted funds away from certain constituencies in the closely-fought 2017 election which the party needed to win.

But perhaps the most controversial aspect was the inclusion of unredacted emails and WhatsApp messages from Corbyn critics, which laid bare internal tensions and factionalism.

Some of the messages contained derogatory comments about pro-Corbyn MPs and staff.

A subsequent report, external into the leak and the wider culture in the party by Mr Forde found, for example, "the criticisms of Diane Abbott are not simply a harsh response to perceived poor performance – they are expressions of visceral disgust".

The report had been intended as a submission to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which was, at the time, in the process of completing what would be a highly-critical report of the party’s response to complaints of antisemitism during the Corbyn leadership.

Following legal advice, the party’s then general secretary Jennie Formby did not submit the document to the EHRC and decided it should not be made public, but it was leaked early in April 2020, within a week of Starmer becoming party leader.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3ggr3pg4ljo

Labour rosette

Opposition to Jeremy Corbyn 'hindered' anti-Semitism action, claims report

A leaked report says some Labour party staff had been "obstructive" rather than helping its leader.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52271317

OP posts:
Maggiethecat · 03/06/2024 23:28

timenowplease · 03/06/2024 21:49

Right so.. You could have saved yourself a load of hassle and said to yourself 'My own direct impression of not experiencing any racism as an Irish person is probably a bad guide to understanding other peoples journey so maybe I'll hould me whist here and refrain from posting nonsense on this thread'.

You have a cheek to tell @whatab to calm down.

@Sweden99 - seems you need an editor of your posts 🙄

JanesLittleGirl · 03/06/2024 22:51

As an aside, can anyone remember a British crime series where Travellers were part of the storyline where the Travellers were not depicted as feckless, violent criminals?

SinnerBoy · 03/06/2024 22:16

Sweden99 · Today 08:16

In the context of Britain, anti Irish Catholic racism is trivial (speaking as one). It does happen but it is just not a significant part of the culture.

Anyone perceived as Irish was looked down on in the 50s. My dad's dad was Northern Irish Protestant and my dad got called a "Paddy" and a "Mick" etc. In England, people from the two sides stuck together in many cases, as they had the same prejudice.

My mam's mam was Northern Irish Catholic, but brought up on the continent from a young age and didn't get any of it, as she went to a private convent school and didn't have an Irish accent. In any case, at the schools she went to when they moved to Britain had a lot of Irish nuns.

timenowplease · 03/06/2024 21:53

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 21:50

Becauae she made things up.

Ok so.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 21:50

timenowplease · 03/06/2024 21:49

Right so.. You could have saved yourself a load of hassle and said to yourself 'My own direct impression of not experiencing any racism as an Irish person is probably a bad guide to understanding other peoples journey so maybe I'll hould me whist here and refrain from posting nonsense on this thread'.

You have a cheek to tell @whatab to calm down.

Becauae she made things up.

timenowplease · 03/06/2024 21:49

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 21:28

Originally, to suggest that our own direct impressions are a bad guide.

Right so.. You could have saved yourself a load of hassle and said to yourself 'My own direct impression of not experiencing any racism as an Irish person is probably a bad guide to understanding other peoples journey so maybe I'll hould me whist here and refrain from posting nonsense on this thread'.

You have a cheek to tell @whatab to calm down.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 21:28

timenowplease · 03/06/2024 21:21

What was the point of sharing this information of your own personal experience? It serves no purpose other than to cast aspersions on claims to the contrary.

Originally, to suggest that our own direct impressions are a bad guide.

timenowplease · 03/06/2024 21:21

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 18:54

I did refer to not having seen first hand anti-semitism in the UK. This was not to say it does not exist, my personal experience does not equate to a greater reality! Many people do not believe in things they do not see themselves but I am not one of those people. I perhaps could have emphasized this more strongly.

What was the point of sharing this information of your own personal experience? It serves no purpose other than to cast aspersions on claims to the contrary.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 20:57

Maggiethecat · 03/06/2024 20:29

yes, but…

Yes. Indeed. And thanks,
I really do not think there is much anti-Irish Catholic prejudice in Britain at all. Our Catholic school in Britain was evacuated once with a bomb scare (during the troubles) and we laughed as a Catholic British school seemed about the safest place from bombing back then.

Maggiethecat · 03/06/2024 20:29

yes, but…

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 19:32

To be fair to @whatab, if she genuinely thought I was writing anti-semitic racism, then she was reasonable to object.

ThreeWordHarpy · 03/06/2024 19:17

Separately, why is another poster claiming that comparing antisemitic racism to other forms of racism is 'contentious'?

assuming this is a genuine question, because the whole point of the controversy around DA’s letter was the ranking of different forms of racism against each other.

To be clear, all forms of racism are abhorrent, however the origins, context and outworkings of racism against different groups such as Travellers, Jews, Black, Irish, and/or Asian people mean that blanket platitudes, statements and solutions run the danger of causing more offence due to their ignorance. By which I mean the assumption that the default is white, British and Protestants, and anyone else can be categorised as “other”. One poster has tried to share their experience of racism as a Catholic Irish person and been honest about their lack of awareness of other forms of prejudice when they were younger and received aggressive, critical posts for it - from you!

So yes, you’ve proved the very point that that poster was trying to make. It can be contentious trying to push different forms of racism together, because the moment you discuss one form of racism someone will jump in with a load of whataboutery about another form.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 18:54

I did refer to not having seen first hand anti-semitism in the UK. This was not to say it does not exist, my personal experience does not equate to a greater reality! Many people do not believe in things they do not see themselves but I am not one of those people. I perhaps could have emphasized this more strongly.

Maggiethecat · 03/06/2024 17:25

I think if @whatab re reads the posts she will find that perhaps she has misunderstood @Sweden99?

It’s easy to become so entrenched in your pov that you cannot see what the other person is saying no matter the repetition or reframing their point.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 17:10

I think you should calm it.
You should read properly and apologise.

whatab · 03/06/2024 17:07

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 16:54

I think you should calm it.
You should read properly and apologise.

Calm what? I assume it's best if I disengage now though as I don't think you're willing to acknowledge my points and we're obviously not going to agree on this. I don't have time to get into an argument, nor do I want to.

Imagine though if your quoted post was about any other form of racism, rather than racism towards Travellers or Jewish people. Saying "just calm it" comes across dismissing or denying it. I'm not Jewish or a Traveller so perhaps it's not for me to comment but I believe all forms of racism are wrong. Equally wrong.

As for apologies. I'm not DA but I understand that she has already apologised.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 16:54

I think you should calm it.
You should read properly and apologise.

whatab · 03/06/2024 16:40

Many times, when racism towards other groups, rather than Jewish people or Travellers, is mentioned, many posters write that it's not for other people to tell the person who has experienced racism that "they're making it up" or "exaggerating" or "seeing offence when it isn't there". I don't know why but for some reason that argument doesn't always seem to be applied when the victim is Jewish or a Traveller. All racism should be equally condemned and none should be deemed worse than another.

On a separate but related note, as I mentioned earlier on this thread, some people are both black and Jewish.

whatab · 03/06/2024 16:33

MarieDeGournay · 03/06/2024 15:58

I think most posters have tried to be careful about not dismissing one group's experience, while asserting another group's.

Objecting to DA's brushing aside of certain forms of prejudice [by comparison to hair colour, and by referring to pre-Civil Rights USA, rather than the UK] is not the same as denying that there are specificities in the lived experience of various groups in society.
[BTW DA specifically referred to 'Irish people' in general, not to 'Irish Travellers']
You may have misread some posts, whatab.

The OP referenced a letter by DA to The Observer. From the OP (and the Times article OP linked)
in which she likened the discrimination suffered by Jewish people, the Irish and Travellers to the bullying of redheads

So DA did mention Travellers separately from Irish people.

Separately, why is another poster claiming that comparing antisemitic racism to other forms of racism is 'contentious'? What's contentious, unless those posters are dismissing, denying, or dismissing antisemitic racism?

All forms of racism, no matter which group it's directed at, are wrong. It's not something that should require comparisons. When I say comparisons, I mean suggesting that one type of racism is "less bad'" than another. I suppose the only legitimate comparison I can think of is that, although sadly all forms of racism still exist, it seems mainly antisemitic and anti-Traveller racism that is most often dismissed or downplayed or denied.

As for misreading, maybe I have but this from Sweden99 There is enough racism in this world that people should not have to make things up to be hurt. is something I've noticed being claimed whenever Jewish people mention antisemitic hate crimes and just general antisemitic sentiments. I'm not necessarily talking about MN. I mean in general on and offline. With MN, I've not been on many threads where the issues have come up. I was on this board for the feminism.

MarieDeGournay · 03/06/2024 15:58

I think most posters have tried to be careful about not dismissing one group's experience, while asserting another group's.

Objecting to DA's brushing aside of certain forms of prejudice [by comparison to hair colour, and by referring to pre-Civil Rights USA, rather than the UK] is not the same as denying that there are specificities in the lived experience of various groups in society.
[BTW DA specifically referred to 'Irish people' in general, not to 'Irish Travellers']
You may have misread some posts, whatab.

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 15:43

@whatab I am glad you had Jewish friends. I line with my romantic life (dominated by Jewish Americans) I married a Jewish American.
No-one is saying that anti-semitism is made up. That is you lying.
I said (as you know) that comparing anti-semitism to anti-black, anti-Irish Catholic racism or anti-traveller racism can be contentious. You are also cross at me not doing it enough.

whatab · 03/06/2024 15:37

I admit I didn't understand my Jewish friends when I was younger. I was brought up in a household that condemned all forms of racism and I was quite naive. I understand more now.

The last two posts speak for themselves. Couldn't be clearer dismissal of antisemitic racism. Apparently it's "contentious" and "made up".

I'm not the type to report posts and as I'm quite new here I'm not sure of the etiquette on when to do that so if your post is reported I'm letting you know here it wasn't me.

I'd completely understand though if someone else does, although personally I think they should stay because they're a clear example of the dismissal of antisemitic racism (the dismissal imo is in itself antisemitic racism).

Sweden99 · 03/06/2024 15:18

ThreeWordHarpy · 03/06/2024 15:12

The very fact that you suggest antisemitic racism is 'contentious' suggests you're dismissing or downplaying it.

@Sweden99 clearly says the bundling of antisemitism with other forms of racism is (or could be) contentious. Not antisemitism itself.

Thank you.
There is enough racism in this world that people should not have to make things up to be hurt.

ThreeWordHarpy · 03/06/2024 15:12

The very fact that you suggest antisemitic racism is 'contentious' suggests you're dismissing or downplaying it.

@Sweden99 clearly says the bundling of antisemitism with other forms of racism is (or could be) contentious. Not antisemitism itself.