Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Countries that are truly liberal, safe, and not captured by gender ideology?

65 replies

HelenaRavenclaw · 25/05/2024 19:23

I just listened to Ted Cruz grilling a New York judge to ordered a trans-identifying male serial rapist to be transferred to a women's prison. It seems like there's nowhere we can get the best of both worlds, a place where men are not allowed to legally identify as women and invade women's safe spaces, and where society is progressive and safe for women. The most "progressive" places like California, New York, Canada, Australia, Scandinavia, etc. are captured by gender ideology. England fares slightly better than Scotland, but with Labour likely to be at the helm soon I have little hope for improvement in this regard.

Places that don't pander to gender ideology are unsafe in other respects -- the deep south of America has widespread gun ownership and racism, the middle east's treatment of women is appalling, and so on. Without sacrificing quality of life and healthcare safety standards, is there any "first-world" democratic country, or region of such a country, that is truly good for women?

OP posts:
FrancescaContini · 26/05/2024 08:54

roarrfeckingroar · 26/05/2024 08:38

Terf island or perhaps Israel are where we need to be.

I’d sooner stick pins in my eyes than live in Israel.

roarrfeckingroar · 26/05/2024 08:38

Terf island or perhaps Israel are where we need to be.

roarrfeckingroar · 26/05/2024 08:37

They're all countries run by and for men.

The trans rights people care about are for trans identified men. They're the ones encroaching on women's rights and eroding women and children's safety. Does anyone care if a trans man (woman) enters a male space or sport? No because power imbalance.

We need a matriarchy.

teawamutu · 26/05/2024 08:21

fromorbit · 25/05/2024 22:54

We have to face the reality, that Terf Island is the best available option.

Yes women's rights are under attack, but we are the only country where there is enough support society wide that a fightback is happening, not from the right, but by a movement that unites left, centre and right. I genuinely think that long term the attempt to crush women's resistance in the UK is going to fail. It will take years to fight back, but we have an ever expanding network of people fighting for the rights of women and gay people .

Our side is getting stronger, despite setbacks. SEEN networks are being established in all branches of our society and are legally protected and are only going to grow and become more powerful.

Our Free Speech protection movement is gathering strength too.

Every day the sexist horrors of the gender movement are being more widely reported. People are not going to put up with it.

Obviously fighting against Labour is going to be difficult, but Scottish women already wrecked the SNP. Teaching Starmer a lesson is not going to be anymore difficult than taking on Sturgeon.

This election might not be decided on women's rights, but the election in 2028 will look very different.

I don't know why we are different, but I genuinely think it is something to do with deep embedded nature of our society and country. There was a reason that Mary Wollstonecraft came from the UK. There is a reason that we have Mumsnet. There is a reason Britannica has a trident.

For those who think we are going to be defeated, there is a key problem. We have BETTER LAWYERS. In a country based on hundreds of years of laws that matters.

Needed to read that this morning. Thank you!

CroftonWillow · 26/05/2024 08:01

France and Italy don't seem too absorbed by it. Japan and Korea also.

EasternStandard · 26/05/2024 07:59

domineastronomy · 26/05/2024 07:54

England. And even a Labour government will not silence us.
We have the strongest women in this respect in the world. And the best lawyers.

I hope so. I think we’re strong, speak clearly and mn helps us talk about it together

The Cass review is a good example of post gender shift. It’s sensible and respected

We need more in that direction

Labour are concerning as some of their MPs are very tied to gender ideology and they created the issue with the GRA, which they’ll defend

But Scotland Isla Bryson spooked them a bit tg

Court cases are another good way, they tend to help by going our way

FrancescaContini · 26/05/2024 07:59

Not called “TERF Island” for nothing 😉

domineastronomy · 26/05/2024 07:54

England. And even a Labour government will not silence us.
We have the strongest women in this respect in the world. And the best lawyers.

FrancescaContini · 26/05/2024 07:54

Given the countries listed here, we need a new definition of “liberal”: Sweden and Iran couldn’t be more dissimilar yet both allow men to “be women”. Neither care one jot for safeguarding women and children, clearly. At least we already knew this about Iran, but Sweden - ?

Timeisstiking · 26/05/2024 07:48

mach2 · 25/05/2024 23:42

I'm surprised that Pakistan allows self-ID

Of course it does. Better to have a man ‘be a woman’ than a gay man (given homosexuality is illegal there).

Bet there aren’t many women identifying as men. Or if there are - I wonder if the men treat the ‘trans man’ as a man. 🤔 (*of course they don’t)

Timeisstiking · 26/05/2024 07:28

If Labour were biological realists, I’d say England is the best place to be. Unfortunately with their (essentially) self ID policy and looming general election win, sadly not England anymore.

Florida?

HelenaRavenclaw · 26/05/2024 02:07

mickybarrysmum · 25/05/2024 22:46

Hello do you have a link to the ted Cruz judge thing please

MUST WATCH: Chaos Erupts When Senator Cruz Calls Out Woke Biden Judge

Senator Cruz participates in Senate Judiciary hearing on 5.22.24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hveqyfAY9ug

OP posts:
mach2 · 25/05/2024 23:47

Iran does it to trans away the gay. I guess Pakistan must be similar.

duc748 · 25/05/2024 23:46

Iran's the same, isn't it?

mach2 · 25/05/2024 23:42

I'm surprised that Pakistan allows self-ID

quixote9 · 25/05/2024 23:25

fromorbit · 25/05/2024 22:54

We have to face the reality, that Terf Island is the best available option.

Yes women's rights are under attack, but we are the only country where there is enough support society wide that a fightback is happening, not from the right, but by a movement that unites left, centre and right. I genuinely think that long term the attempt to crush women's resistance in the UK is going to fail. It will take years to fight back, but we have an ever expanding network of people fighting for the rights of women and gay people .

Our side is getting stronger, despite setbacks. SEEN networks are being established in all branches of our society and are legally protected and are only going to grow and become more powerful.

Our Free Speech protection movement is gathering strength too.

Every day the sexist horrors of the gender movement are being more widely reported. People are not going to put up with it.

Obviously fighting against Labour is going to be difficult, but Scottish women already wrecked the SNP. Teaching Starmer a lesson is not going to be anymore difficult than taking on Sturgeon.

This election might not be decided on women's rights, but the election in 2028 will look very different.

I don't know why we are different, but I genuinely think it is something to do with deep embedded nature of our society and country. There was a reason that Mary Wollstonecraft came from the UK. There is a reason that we have Mumsnet. There is a reason Britannica has a trident.

For those who think we are going to be defeated, there is a key problem. We have BETTER LAWYERS. In a country based on hundreds of years of laws that matters.

The UK (or mainly the English??) have a historically longer and culturally more embedded sense of rights than any other group I can think of.

It makes sense to me that they'd be better able to handle the concepts of universal rights (including women!) and competing rights.

If you can hold both those thoughts in your mind at once, you're automatically a terf. Trans ideology requires erasing women as step one. And at least in the US, competing rights give people mental breakdowns. So complicated! That's why so many free speech absolutists and libertarians here.

anothernamitynamenamechange · 25/05/2024 23:04

EasternStandard · 25/05/2024 22:31

I agree with you and before gender legislation was brought in in many countries societies could be liberal and not undermined by a harmful ideology

We’ve taken a wrong turn, who will get past it?

I think part of the answer has to be tempering idealism with pragmatism. I don't think the situation is hopeless.

Davros · 25/05/2024 23:04

@fromorbit 👏

EasternStandard · 25/05/2024 23:02

I think we’re top but we’re about to have a GE

duc748 · 25/05/2024 22:58

We have to face the reality, that Terf Island is the best available option.

It seems so. I thought Sweden was having second thoughts, but it seems there, it's one step forward, and one step back.

fromorbit · 25/05/2024 22:54

We have to face the reality, that Terf Island is the best available option.

Yes women's rights are under attack, but we are the only country where there is enough support society wide that a fightback is happening, not from the right, but by a movement that unites left, centre and right. I genuinely think that long term the attempt to crush women's resistance in the UK is going to fail. It will take years to fight back, but we have an ever expanding network of people fighting for the rights of women and gay people .

Our side is getting stronger, despite setbacks. SEEN networks are being established in all branches of our society and are legally protected and are only going to grow and become more powerful.

Our Free Speech protection movement is gathering strength too.

Every day the sexist horrors of the gender movement are being more widely reported. People are not going to put up with it.

Obviously fighting against Labour is going to be difficult, but Scottish women already wrecked the SNP. Teaching Starmer a lesson is not going to be anymore difficult than taking on Sturgeon.

This election might not be decided on women's rights, but the election in 2028 will look very different.

I don't know why we are different, but I genuinely think it is something to do with deep embedded nature of our society and country. There was a reason that Mary Wollstonecraft came from the UK. There is a reason that we have Mumsnet. There is a reason Britannica has a trident.

For those who think we are going to be defeated, there is a key problem. We have BETTER LAWYERS. In a country based on hundreds of years of laws that matters.

mickybarrysmum · 25/05/2024 22:46

Hello do you have a link to the ted Cruz judge thing please

anothernamitynamenamechange · 25/05/2024 22:40

@HelenaRavenclaw That's probably where I'm at too. America's a funny place really because they seem completely divided by a shared set of values. You an have someone talking about "freedom/individual liberty", "protecting children", "the other side banning books" "fighting totalitarianism" etc etc and its a complete toss up whether they are a hard core republican (US party) or a hard core liberal (US party).

HelenaRavenclaw · 25/05/2024 22:36

@anothernamitynamenamechange Completely agree. I mean liberal as a mix of those two definitions, i.e. supporting freedom of speech, religion, same-sex marriage, abortion, etc. and not being racist / misogynistic. Essentially what US Republicans would call "those liberals", but without their support for gender ideology, kids drag shows, and explicit sexual content in children's books. (Not to say I agree with Republicans on everything else obviously... e.g. I disagree with their definition of "freedom" which includes gun ownership, which I suppose is statistically more of a threat in America than the "freedom" of men in women's toilets.)

OP posts:
anothernamitynamenamechange · 25/05/2024 22:35

CranfordScones · 25/05/2024 22:26

By 'truly liberal' you presumably mean 'socially liberal' which is exactly the group most likely to endorse gender ideology. Those who oppose gender ideology tend to be socially conservative (at least to some moderate degree).

Except for Iran which is far from liberal but OK with transgender (comparatively). Or South American countries which tend to be much more socially conservative but have embraced gender ideology to differing extents (even though there is still lots of genuine discrimination/violence at ground level). Or India. Or, closer to home, somewhere like Malta which has fairly illiberal policies when it comes to e.g. abortion but is super keen on trans rights.

I just don't think seeing the world through this very American prism is helpful. Of course, we have lots in common in America and its good to see where there are similarities (e.g. the eagerness of many left wing parties to pivot to identity style politics) but there are lots of ways in which the American political landscape does not = the UK or the world more generally.