Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sewing Bee 2024

158 replies

ThreeWordHarpy · 20/05/2024 14:36

I expect there will be a thread in the crafts forum, but only posting this here because my usual sewing social media channels have gone a bit bananas because one of the contestants is a DEI director, has they/them pronouns and a drag persona/alter ego. https://www.williamgee.co.uk/the-great-british-sewing-bee-2024-air-date-and-contestants/

Aside from the central casting cliche, (the usual Love Productions approach) I wish the contestant luck and I look forward to seeing what they can do in the sewing room My main point that any discussion on the program itself is going to be impossible until and unless that contestant is eliminated. Interestingly, it seems that people are a lot less “be kind” than they were for Matthew last year. Or maybe the moderators of the FB groups I’m on haven’t yet swing into action with the ban hammer…

OP posts:
Floisme · 22/05/2024 18:10

Oh that's interesting @MontyDonsBlueScarf.

MontyDonsBlueScarf · 22/05/2024 18:00

I too had the impression that the sewing skills are sadly lacking. However as Patrick said that an A line skirt featured in the first ever programme, I checked it out. It turns out that it was a significantly easier pattern - front, back, zip, hem, that's it. Buttonholes and topstitching take forever so to do this year's skirt in the same time is a significantly harder challenge. Patrick and Esme must be well aware of this and I wonder why they've chosen to do it. Or perhaps they've been overriden by the producers.

CountingCrones · 22/05/2024 16:25

Rose from TGPTD has made some absolutely vile comments on SM, particularly to lesbian organisations because Rose is one of those new-fangled male lesbians. Misogyny writ large in that one.

All of the reality talent shows (Bake Off et al) want a diverse demographic to make it easy to tell contenstants apart, have different back stories and have people to root for. I know two people who made it to the final castings of these programmes and both weren't selected as there was someone else who fit their demographic in the mix. One was specifically told she'd have been picked in a different year. THat's just telly, I guess.

Floisme · 22/05/2024 16:14

I was also struck by the low standard of garments produced in the pattern challenge. It looked as if Esme and Patrick were too. I don't think it was all down to lack of time as I got the impression that many (even most) of the contestants were struggling with basic pattern comprehension and basic - albeit tricky - skills. And no I'm not great either at top stitching and zips which is why I wouldn't dream of putting myself forward for a competition, let alone a televised one.

Do I think it was a coincidence that the young woman who won the other 2 challenges came last in the pattern one? No.

I didn't watch the show 10 years ago but I'm wondering if, in order to attract ( and also not humiliate) a wider demographic, they're having to rejig the challenges to favour creativity and risk taking over solid sewing skills, and whether the group losing out are the older women who were taught sewing in school?

illinivich · 22/05/2024 15:09

The timings of the challenges mean that most of the contestants just waste material. But i think the audience like looking at something brilliant, or something dreadful but not a load of okay items. The best sewer/baker/potter can meet the time, the rest are producing something we all think we could do better than.

ThreeWordHarpy · 22/05/2024 14:13

cosmumsaysso · 22/05/2024 09:25

Why don't they give the contestants a bit longer in the challenges, especially the final garment.

The denim skirt challenge was a mess. Give the contestants more time in the final challenge too, so they can produce proper finished garments, and show the judges exactly what they can do.

I agree. The timings for the pattern challenge should be set so that the best sewers at least will finish the garment to a high standard, and most of everyone else will finish but to a lower standard. The fact that none of them produced a finished skirt of a reasonable standard means they badly underestimated the time needed.

The other two challenges were good. Might have been kind to give them access to overlockers for the t shirts though

OP posts:
cosmumsaysso · 22/05/2024 09:25

Why don't they give the contestants a bit longer in the challenges, especially the final garment.

The denim skirt challenge was a mess. Give the contestants more time in the final challenge too, so they can produce proper finished garments, and show the judges exactly what they can do.

TigathaChristie · 21/05/2024 12:21

I agree OP and even before the contestants were announced, I knew there would be a drag artist. I get the point of diversity, but having sewed for the past 40 years, I can tell you that at least 80% of the people I meet in my local fabric shop and haberdashers, are middle aged or elderly women. For once it would be nice if this was acknowledged. I'm not suggesting that the line up is purely this demographic but why oh why does every programme of this type have to be a carbon copy ticklist.

I'll still be watching because I enjoy it but as a pp mentioned it is definitely not 12 of the country's "best amateur sewers" - I seem to remember one bloke saying that he'd never made a dress! To me that is like going on Bake Off and saying you'd never made a cake! It always amazes me that people have the nerve/confidence (depending on your pov) to apply for things when their knowledge is so limited. I guess it works though or we wouldn't keep watching it.

CocoapuffPuff · 21/05/2024 12:06

Oh yes. As a trained pattern and clothing maker, I cannot tell you how often I've chuntered at the telly. "What do you mean, you've never put in a fecking zip???"

I think their ability to handle pressure is awesome, but the sewing is frankly mostly poor, mainly because of the stupid timescales I expect.

ThreeWordHarpy · 21/05/2024 11:59

MontyDonsBlueScarf · 21/05/2024 10:43

Exactly this. It's not really about sewing any more.

I had some sewing lessons from a lovely lady who says she always gets an uptick in enquiries when Sewing Bee is broadcast, but winces at the sewing practices shown. A lot of her lessons involved “don’t do it like they do it on the telly, do it like this”. She showed me a really good, foolproof way of inserting an invisible zip. However it involves a few extra steps that the contestants obviously don’t have time for, so they go for the short cuts and hope they come off. It might be better telly but it’s rubbish if you want to learn anything about sewing (or cooking or genealogy etc).

her approach was, learn the old fashioned proper way to do things, like pinning AND tacking before sewing, because there’s a better chance of it working first time and it is not fun spending sewing time unpicking stuff that’s gone wrong. Then when you’re more experienced you can develop your own short cuts depending on what you’re good at.

OP posts:
quantumbutterfly · 21/05/2024 11:25

MontyDonsBlueScarf · 21/05/2024 10:43

Exactly this. It's not really about sewing any more.

True. The painted canvas into a garment challenge was quite bonkers.

BackToLurk · 21/05/2024 11:00

ThreeWordHarpy · 20/05/2024 17:02

These programs are not really sewing, pottery or baking competitions; they are TV shows structured around sewing etc. The contestants are chosen for TV appeal and are definitely not because they are the best sewers applying to the show

Sadly I think you’re right in how they evolved. The first series of Sewing Bee was very different with the winner being an older lady who was an excellent tailoress, but the makeover challenges were alterations that reflected real life scenarios rather than “make an outfit from a deckchair”. She’d have struggled in later seasons with that round.

It’s all about the “journey” now isn’t it. I used to really enjoy Who Do You Think You Are? back in the earlier series it gave more information about how the researchers found the information and showed the celebs logging onto Ancestry a bit more - although clearly staged it at least acknowledged how some of the information was derived. The focus on actual genealogy has faded considerably recently.

See also Mastermind, which now has to have a 2 minute chat at the end with the winner. Just answer the questions and fuck off.

There, got that off my chest

MontyDonsBlueScarf · 21/05/2024 10:43

ThreeWordHarpy · 20/05/2024 17:02

These programs are not really sewing, pottery or baking competitions; they are TV shows structured around sewing etc. The contestants are chosen for TV appeal and are definitely not because they are the best sewers applying to the show

Sadly I think you’re right in how they evolved. The first series of Sewing Bee was very different with the winner being an older lady who was an excellent tailoress, but the makeover challenges were alterations that reflected real life scenarios rather than “make an outfit from a deckchair”. She’d have struggled in later seasons with that round.

It’s all about the “journey” now isn’t it. I used to really enjoy Who Do You Think You Are? back in the earlier series it gave more information about how the researchers found the information and showed the celebs logging onto Ancestry a bit more - although clearly staged it at least acknowledged how some of the information was derived. The focus on actual genealogy has faded considerably recently.

Exactly this. It's not really about sewing any more.

ThreeWordHarpy · 21/05/2024 10:35

Delphin · 21/05/2024 09:20

@ThreeWordHarpy : So I fully support the idea of showing that sewing can be for everyone, I just wish Love Productions didn’t appear to have a casting list with established “types” that appear every year.
So true. It seems it is the same clicheed types every year now. I remember years ago, they had a man who was a lieutenant-colonel in the Army, who just did his thing with the sewing machine without being either gay, a drag artist or a gendered person. I think he either won or came second.

Oh yes, I recall he did so well at making a kilt that Patrick said he’d love to wear it. Made lots of frocks for his wife.

i think his military training meant he had similar skills to the doctors that do so well - organised, attention to detail, coped well under pressure.

OP posts:
Delphin · 21/05/2024 09:20

@ThreeWordHarpy : So I fully support the idea of showing that sewing can be for everyone, I just wish Love Productions didn’t appear to have a casting list with established “types” that appear every year.
So true. It seems it is the same clicheed types every year now. I remember years ago, they had a man who was a lieutenant-colonel in the Army, who just did his thing with the sewing machine without being either gay, a drag artist or a gendered person. I think he either won or came second.

QueenBitch666 · 20/05/2024 23:59

Davros · 20/05/2024 21:46

Agreed, I like these programmes but you can see the Demograohic requirements a mile off. There have been negative comments in MN about Rose in the Pottery Throwdown, they have apparently made questionable comments on SM or somewhere-or-other. Sorry, can't remember details but I remember reading it on MN quite some time ago

' Rose ' was making vile comments on X regarding a vulnerable sick woman who refused to have a trans male looking after her. He quickly retracted the vile comments but I'm sure there's screenshots out there...
How he's still on TGPTD I don't know

teawamutu · 20/05/2024 22:15

PeppercornMill · 20/05/2024 20:31

I don't know why anyone is surprised by the tickbox casting on these shows, every single one runs to the same pattern:

  • Retired man.
  • Retired woman.
  • Manly man who also does baking/sewing etc
  • English person.
  • Scottish person.
  • Welsh person.
  • Irish person.
  • European person.
  • Female student.
  • Gay man.
  • etc.

Reminds me of the Victoria Wood 'Mia Farrow selecting children in the style of Countdown' clip.

ThreeWordHarpy · 20/05/2024 22:07

I agree some of Rose’s pottery work and online comments are noteworthy of discussion from an FWR perspective. I was talking about the pottery community/ programme fans in general. Anyway I don’t mind Rose on the programme as Rose is doing Rich’s old job before Rich got promoted from negotiating with the kiln gods to presenter. I could watch that man at the wheel all night long. His long delicate fingers. <fans self> I live for the episodes where he demonstrates the throw down challenge, otherwise I have to make do with the opening titles.

OP posts:
CocoapuffPuff · 20/05/2024 22:01

All these shows probably have a tick box list that is used, it's obvious. It's not about the UK's best amateur sew-er. It's about the best sew-er out of a carefully curated diversity approved, group of people preapproved and selected to participate in a lightweight, fluffy TV show that pretends to be a competition.

If anyone is a doctor, they'll win.
If anyone cheats by copying vintage patterns and claiming they drafted it themselves (2 previous entrants), they'll receive high praise indeed.
If anyone designs and makes for a drag artist, self or a pal, they'll be fabulous.
It's predictable.

Davros · 20/05/2024 21:46

Agreed, I like these programmes but you can see the Demograohic requirements a mile off. There have been negative comments in MN about Rose in the Pottery Throwdown, they have apparently made questionable comments on SM or somewhere-or-other. Sorry, can't remember details but I remember reading it on MN quite some time ago

BrownTableMat · 20/05/2024 20:42

TheTripThatWasnt · 20/05/2024 17:52

I think this is more reflective of who you know than the sewing community! Many, many sewers (definitely most sewers) do not fit into the 'LGBT/queer/alternative' subculture, but are broadly as a poster describes them upthread!

Yes, that’s why I said I also know a lot of elderly women who sew.

quantumbutterfly · 20/05/2024 20:34

The great British sewing bee walks into a bar...but what's the punchline?

PeppercornMill · 20/05/2024 20:31

I don't know why anyone is surprised by the tickbox casting on these shows, every single one runs to the same pattern:

  • Retired man.
  • Retired woman.
  • Manly man who also does baking/sewing etc
  • English person.
  • Scottish person.
  • Welsh person.
  • Irish person.
  • European person.
  • Female student.
  • Gay man.
  • etc.
TheTripThatWasnt · 20/05/2024 17:52

BrownTableMat · 20/05/2024 16:17

Meh. I can’t get that excited about it. Nearly everyone I know who sews is either an elderly woman, OR in the LGBT/queer/alternative subculture. It’s hardly news that a lot of people who’re into fashion are also gay or alternative - the programme probably hits about the right balance here.

I think this is more reflective of who you know than the sewing community! Many, many sewers (definitely most sewers) do not fit into the 'LGBT/queer/alternative' subculture, but are broadly as a poster describes them upthread!

teawamutu · 20/05/2024 17:34

Was Matthew the rather sweet one who put harnesses on absolutely everything but was actually a bit shit at sewing?

I wouldn't be surprised - assuming they're a gender-addled grievance gerbil - if this new one is similar.