Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The Times: Labour plans to simplify ‘dehumanising’ gender change process

254 replies

ResisterRex · 19/05/2024 21:56

Read it and weep, vipers

"Labour will make it easier to change gender and is considering allowing a single family doctor to sign off on the decision under plans to “simplify” the process.

The party is considering how to make the legally binding certificate easier to obtain while still having guardrails to prevent mirroring controversial ­proposals in Scotland that would have ­removed doctors from the process ­altogether.

The plans include ditching a panel of doctors and lawyers that approve ­gender recognition certificates, the document allowing transgender people to have their affirmed gender legally recognised, and only requiring one doctor to be involved in the process.

The Times understands that one option under consideration is that the doctor could be a GP. Labour would ­also ­remove the ability of a spouse to object to the change. A source said the party wanted to make the process “less medicalised” but added that the plans would retain the involvement of a doctor and would not allow people to self-identify in order to obtain legal changes.

They said it had not yet been decided whether the medical professional would be a GP or a gender specialist, with the issue likely to go to consultation if the party wins the next election.

The discussions centre on concerns that if the single doctor was a specialist, a GP would still need to make the ­referral, therefore retaining the two-step process that Labour wants to drop."

Labour plans to simplify ‘dehumanising’ gender change process

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/604c739c-70b7-4819-866f-370ae67da6ab?shareToken=2a1dede2a48c5ec7388167f16bdd6cbb

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
ResisterRex · 19/05/2024 22:15

Trapping women in abusive relationships where the man is drunk on his own fetish and power.

Making it easier for fetishistic men to evade safeguarding.

What could go wrong?

(Yes I'm livid)

OP posts:
UtopiaPlanitia · 19/05/2024 22:14

So basically it’s more of the bureaucratic creeping self-ID by the back door and removal of spousal objection. So they haven’t listened to one thing GC campaigners have tried to tell them 🤷‍♀️

That isn’t acceptable to me as a leftwing feminist. I do not support Labour in this endeavour.

Runskiyoga · 19/05/2024 22:04

<watch me stampede away from thoughts of voting Labour>

Don't build on bad law Labour, you need to differentiate sex and gender first. Self ID of gender not an issue.

lonelywater · 19/05/2024 22:03

labour in still fucking batshit mental shocker. Not.

Swipe left for the next trending thread