Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

'They': being expected to remember the requirement to deny reality

185 replies

SwedishKvinnaboske · 12/05/2024 02:05

I just hugely enjoyed, for all of its faults, another glorious Eurovision final - it's the highlight of the TV year for my family.

However, I couldn't help noticing in the TV commentary that Graham Norton - himself obviously no stranger to the 'LGBT community' - automatically used sex-based pronouns for the two 'non-binary-identifying' finalists who both make it known that they prefer to use 'they' - in English, at least (I presume that Nemo must have seen the obvious drawback in German, where the same word 'sie' is used for 'she' and for 'they', with the context sometimes only being clear from the correct use of the singular or plural form of the verb).

Once, Graham referred to Bambie Thug as 'she' (but other times used 'they'); and I counted at least three times when he referred to Nemo as 'he', in the midst of all the other uses of 'they'. This included Graham's loud exclamation at the end that "HE'S DONE IT!", which you would normally expect the BBC news afterwards to automatically replay as the defining moment when reporting on the victory. Oddly enough, this moment was notable in its absence, which seemed rather strange.

Unless I'm very much misinformed, all of the other 23 singers in the final use sex-based pronouns, in accordance with biology, and Graham never once failed to use these correct pronouns for the other 92% of performers - even if the potential effects of alcohol consumption are taken into account. Interestingly, he also never accidentally called Bambie 'he' or Nemo 'she'.

My main point in highlighting this is that being expected to refer to a single known individual as 'they' is most obviously not something that comes naturally to most of us, and thus, even if we do willingly (or feel forced to) comply, it presents a real barrier to our normal use of language, as we have to remember to stop and think every time what needs to be changed when dealing with particular people. I'm sure not one of us has ever had to stop and remember to refer to our mum as 'she' or our brother as 'he'.

It feels to me like a round on Richard Osman's House of Games - where the object is to think hard whilst playing and not to forget that every correct number in an answer first has to be doubled or every 'E' has to be changed to an 'O' or whatever. The whole idea of these games is that they're deliberately designed to catch you out if you aren't on high alert at all times. Fun for a half-hour light-hearted brain-teaser, but extremely tiresome to have to follow 24/7 in real life.

If humans being 'non-binary' - and thus 'they' - is indeed, as we are told, a perfectly natural state of affairs, why do our brains have to be temporarily re-wired and constantly on edge every single time we have to address or talk about somebody who demands to be referred to as 'they'? Why must we walk on eggshells and deliberately deny the common-sense reality in language that our brains automatically go to?

How come one person can dictate to countless others that they are not allowed to fully use the natural fluency that they have long had in their own (mutual) native language in order to validate somebody else's (minority) personal beliefs - and in so doing confirm that they must necessarily share these beliefs and are therefore not allowed to hold different ones themselves? It's widely viewed as bigotry/nastiness/phobia not to call a self-proclaimed 'NB' person 'they' - but however much you try to deny it, it simply is not ever instinctive or natural to the vast majority (if not all) of us.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
SwedishKvinnaboske · 13/05/2024 13:22

Eejit that I am and with the bloody hearing loss I thought she'd left for Canada with a partner and couldn't work out what the glaring was about. I only worked it out afterwards.

It wasn't you who were the eejit...

It's also the anger and shaming that you get for not knowing. If you'd make a mistake and discovered that the woman you'd thought was Susie all along was actually named Denise, people would laugh about it with you in a good-natured way - nobody would dream of glaring at you for being mistaken.

OP posts:
BonzoGates · 13/05/2024 12:08

A colleague left my workplace a while ago and I didn't know she was non-binary. So in a casual meeting in a corridor I said oh has Susie gone that's a pity I hear she did great work bla bla.

I got glared at and then told 'Oh yes THEY have gone to Canada' - Followed by more they/theming and exaggerated enunciation.

Eejit that I am and with the bloody hearing loss I thought she'd left for Canada with a partner and couldn't work out what the glaring was about. I only worked it out afterwards.

So I was basically pointedly being 'corrected' over 'misgendering' someone who no longer worked here and who wasn't present in the conversation. By an 'ally' I presume.

Helleofabore · 13/05/2024 11:40

“Unless you interpret disagreement as getting 'mauled'?”

I think that about sums it up.

People pointing out the logical flaws in this weak comparison will be ‘mauling’ a poster I suspect.

And no, remembering an individual’s choice of pronouns is nothing like remembering a new surname. Firstly, you can spend a very long time working or interacting with a person without knowing their surname or even their marital status. It is rarely relevant. And that person’s old identity has not been changed either. Also, if there is a group of people you are interacting with at the same time, when is it relevant to remember each person’s marital status and address it individually these days. We no longer introduce women as ‘Mrs [insert husband’s first and surname].

Secondly, the change of year is material reality that changes at a constant rate of life and cannot be changed in any way materially. It cannot go back and forth between years, it cannot be any other year. We can change the label, but then that requires a complete overhaul of every single person’s reality who uses that label. Still doesn’t change the reality. And if a year was then called a ‘minute’ it would not make a year into a ‘minute’ nor does it change the concept of time and how long a year is using the comparative point of the revolution around the sun.

The two situations are not analogous to a person who adopts a pronoun that falls outside of the established and taught parameters for clear communication. For a person who then may insist that everyone else complies to the demand to act as though they believe in that person’s philosophical belief.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/05/2024 11:38

UsualChaos · 13/05/2024 10:16

It's just like when someone changes their surname after marriage, or when we write the wrong year until we get used to the new one around February.
You get used to it. It's no big deal. I know I'll be a lone voice here on this matter and probably get mauled, but there we are.

You are a lone voice because you don't get it.

It's not like someone changing their name because pronouns (in English) also signify sex, and while not everyone identifies themself by gender, everyone has a sex.

So when someone uses pronouns to make a statement about their feeling of gender they are unavoidably also making a statement that imposes an identity onto everyone else, an identity which I and many other find offensive.

When Bambie Thug decides "They" is more accurate than "She", why does she do that? Because she perceives herself to be different to other women. Is that a physical difference? No. So at heart Bambie is saying "my mind is so different to other women that I'm not even a woman at all".

And to believe that, she must believe that all other women have some sort of "womanny mind" so that unlike her we are happy with the social constraints, limitations and at times straightforward abuse that society imposes on us through the construct of mental womanhood.

I find that breathtakingly arrogant and naive of Bambie and insulting and offensive to me as a woman.

Now, I'm not saying Bambie should not hold those offensive beliefs personally. I might wish she didn't but she has the right to her own thoughts. But I sure as hell don't have to play along with something deeply insulting to me just to be "polite".

The solution is, of course, to have separate language for gender and sex. Kerp the words that have until very recently been unproblematically used for sex to refer to sex and invent some new exciting words for gender. After all, gender people love finding new labels for ever more specific nuances of gender and coming up with new flags, I'm sure they can harness some of that creative energy to coming up with a handful of nouns and pronouns so man/woman/he/she/them can go back to being just based on sex.

Just a handful of new words would defang all this fear, anger and division!

NecessaryScene · 13/05/2024 11:38

Again, that is the entire purpose of names: they are intended to be (generally) unique to you.

And, on top of that, they don't have meaning. They are arbitrary signifiers, so changing your name isn't changing the meaning of anything, or changing the common language.

(Okay, they may have connotations, such as indications of sex, ancestry, etc, but those are just connotations, not concrete meanings. That's why you don't find names in the dictionary...)

SwedishKvinnaboske · 13/05/2024 11:23

UsualChaos · 13/05/2024 10:16

It's just like when someone changes their surname after marriage, or when we write the wrong year until we get used to the new one around February.
You get used to it. It's no big deal. I know I'll be a lone voice here on this matter and probably get mauled, but there we are.

It's not the same thing at all.

Dates have always moved on and changed for millennia - that's their entire purpose - but they're still utterly predictable. If you gave me enough time, I could work out without a shadow of doubt what date it would be a million days from now. We will still never get to the 49th of Octembruary - as this doesn't exist in the long-standing rules that we all know very well.

Surnames - your whole name, in fact - are a specific way of identifying and centring yourself, with you as the subject. Again, that is the entire purpose of names: they are intended to be (generally) unique to you. Pronouns are meant to be a boringly mundane short-form that everybody can use for convenience without having to think for a moment - when somebody demands that you use a random different one just for them, they are deliberately taking away your natural fluency of language from you. It's no different from somebody ordering you to stop referring to the thing you sit on as a chair and to start remembering that you must call it a wardrobe every time.

One other huge difference is that, if you accidentally introduce your friend as Fiona Brown, she will most probably say in a good-natured way something like "Don't you remember? You were at my wedding three months ago - I'm Fiona Robinson now!!" What she will reliably not do is get furious at you and call you a hater for using her erstwhile name; nor will she deny nor take offence at the fact that she was indeed Fiona Brown before, and this simple fact will in no way be a source of shame or disgust for her.

OP posts:
NameChange0101010101 · 13/05/2024 11:22

UsualChaos · 13/05/2024 10:16

It's just like when someone changes their surname after marriage, or when we write the wrong year until we get used to the new one around February.
You get used to it. It's no big deal. I know I'll be a lone voice here on this matter and probably get mauled, but there we are.

I don't know why you think you'll get 'mauled'?

Unless you interpret disagreement as getting 'mauled'?

SidewaysOtter · 13/05/2024 11:13

Bambie Thug reminds me of the woman who invaded Kathleen Stock's speech at the Oxford Union and sat there, having glued herself to the floor, looking like an absolute plum.

I should imagine both of them are similarly annoying, as is Greta Thunberg who has always got right on my tits with her Causes.

HootyMcBooby · 13/05/2024 10:44

UsualChaos · 13/05/2024 10:16

It's just like when someone changes their surname after marriage, or when we write the wrong year until we get used to the new one around February.
You get used to it. It's no big deal. I know I'll be a lone voice here on this matter and probably get mauled, but there we are.

What happens if multiple people in your life start changing their pronouns, especially to "neo" pronouns that can be literally anything they can imagine.
And those who have mixed pronouns like "he/they" which doesn't even make sense.

I'm not prepared to start remembering specific ways of referring to people. It's not how language works. And very rarely would you use a pronoun for someone when they are actually in your presence, so if "zer" expects me to use nonsense words to refer to them when they aren't even in the room, they can piss off.

Compelled language is the start of a very slippery slope. We are already about halfway down that slope and I have no intention of freefalling to the bottom.

Have you seen the transwoman who basically films themselves on Youtube and berates every person they come into contact with who "misgenders" them? They are very obviously male and when someone uses masculine pronouns they demand compelled speech and make complaints against (usually low paid service workers) them, and generally cause them a massive headache.
I will not be told what words to use.
And I will never play the pronoun game. Because it IS a game, and one which you can never hope to win.

BonzoGates · 13/05/2024 10:23

UsualChaos · 13/05/2024 10:16

It's just like when someone changes their surname after marriage, or when we write the wrong year until we get used to the new one around February.
You get used to it. It's no big deal. I know I'll be a lone voice here on this matter and probably get mauled, but there we are.

Well no - you can tell someone's sex so of course you use sex based pronouns.

Communication is complex for me as I'm very hard of hearing and responding to someone relies on a lot of autopilot as I'm often still working out what they've just said. I'm also hyper visual so if someone looks female that's going to be coded into a response.

It's not remotely similar to changing to a new year or using a new surname.

UsualChaos · 13/05/2024 10:16

It's just like when someone changes their surname after marriage, or when we write the wrong year until we get used to the new one around February.
You get used to it. It's no big deal. I know I'll be a lone voice here on this matter and probably get mauled, but there we are.

Ofcourseshecan · 13/05/2024 09:43

lonelywater · 12/05/2024 02:24

its dead simple-anyone who wants me to lie about the reality I can see with my own eyes can shove it.

Well said!

Brewdug · 13/05/2024 09:20

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2024 23:21

I believe that the performers had been told not to fly the NB flag (not sure of details but I doubt it was a specific NB flag ban, more a general political/activist flag ban) so his doing so was by way of a protest. That also explains why he was waving it around so prominantly during the voting, also the odd small rainbow/trans flags popping up from other performers.

I wondered if that was the case - to be honest I didn't specifically know it was the 'non binary' flag - just a trans umbrella one which is tedious enough. So subversive! 🙄

The attention-seeking behaviour of a certain gang of contestants has been offensive throughout. Those flags should be banned, but you can imagine the uproar after everything that's gone on this year, trying to penalise people being their 'authentic selves'...

Chersfrozenface · 13/05/2024 08:18

RebelliousCow · 13/05/2024 08:05

Greta Thunberg has become a new version of Owen Jones. Someone who at one point displayed youthful energy and brilliance, but who has now descended into an unthinking parody of herself. Which is what happens when you become too attached to a particular role or version of yourself and want to keep it going.

Edited

Greta Thunberg has always latched on to the current Cause.

It doesn't actually matter what the subject is, it could be pretty much anything. She just needs a Cause.

She's not unusual in that, of course.

PurpleBugz · 13/05/2024 08:12

Yup and it's not just pronouns. we know a NB child. Her own mother slips up calls her 'she/her' all the time. I find it very difficult but manage to avoid all pronouns just say her name. Trying to be nice when her brother was kicking off and she's left upset I told her she was a really kind sister she had a full toddler meltdown aged 10. Apparently I should have said sibling

RebelliousCow · 13/05/2024 08:08

TheMarzipanDildo · 13/05/2024 07:04

Yeah but in that way people do when they don’t know what she said. Vaguely.

Can't stand Graham Norton these days. I'm well over that camp bitchiness and meanness of spirit - posing as humour. I don't think I've ever gotten over his horrible comments about Amy Winehouse - when she was at her lowest point.

RebelliousCow · 13/05/2024 08:05

Greta Thunberg has become a new version of Owen Jones. Someone who at one point displayed youthful energy and brilliance, but who has now descended into an unthinking parody of herself. Which is what happens when you become too attached to a particular role or version of yourself and want to keep it going.

RebelliousCow · 13/05/2024 08:03

UtopiaPlanitia · 12/05/2024 17:46

I still flinch when I hear people use the word because it was (and in some ways still is) such a loaded insult/derogatory term. During Eurovision semifinal I heard the BBC commentators call the Denmark entry 'the first black queer woman' to compete for Denmark and my instinctive thought was what’s wrong with the word lesbian (or Bi).

'Queer' replaces terms and words which make implicit references to sex or to sex based attraction. 'Queer' muddies the definitions - makes everything more 'fluid', which is one of the main purpose of Queer Theory.

TheMarzipanDildo · 13/05/2024 07:04

AColdClearDrink · 12/05/2024 21:50

Yet didn’t he have a go at J K Rowling?

Yeah but in that way people do when they don’t know what she said. Vaguely.

SwedishKvinnaboske · 13/05/2024 03:15

It wasn't just Graham Norton. Every single live reporter I have seen at Eurovision over the last few days kept on having to correct themselves after instinctively referring to the Irish and Swiss entrants as 'she' and 'he'.

Hmm, interesting. Did you notice them realising that they'd said something 'verboten' and instantly backtracking, though? Graham called Nemo 'he' at least three times that I heard and never changed it or apologised for those instances - although he did later revert to 'they' when he remembered.

Likewise, David Sillitoe, on the news immediately afterwards, referred to Bambie as 'her' at least twice and never 'corrected' himself. In fact, I don't actually recall him once calling her 'they' in his (admittedly short) piece about her.

OP posts:
EsmaCannonball · 13/05/2024 00:25

It wasn't just Graham Norton. Every single live reporter I have seen at Eurovision over the last few days kept on having to correct themselves after instinctively referring to the Irish and Swiss entrants as 'she' and 'he'.

Although I quite liked the Swiss entry and thought he gave a great performance, I did find the message of the song completely tedious. Oh, you've broken the code, have you? Do you not think that over the last several millennia a few other people might have got up one day and thought, 'You know, these gendered sex roles are a bit limiting. I might try breaking a few of the rules.'? Do you not think a few feminists might already have broken that code you've only just cracked?

However, he's not as bad as the Irish contestant, who just seems to be an immense cry-bully.

SwedishKvinnaboske · 12/05/2024 23:38

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2024 23:21

I believe that the performers had been told not to fly the NB flag (not sure of details but I doubt it was a specific NB flag ban, more a general political/activist flag ban) so his doing so was by way of a protest. That also explains why he was waving it around so prominantly during the voting, also the odd small rainbow/trans flags popping up from other performers.

It was interesting how the French singer - who unquestionably does have Palestinian heritage - was banned from displaying the Palestinian flag or any of his own cultural symbols, whilst those who have recently started to feel like something else that happens to have its own flag were just fine to do so.

We actually reached the place where Slimane was told off - and told that he could face sanctions - for calling for peace in the middle of his act. Nothing political and nobody named or blamed; just for wanting a world of peace!!! Didn't Nicole win the contest back in 1982 for expressing the same apparently controversial and outrageous view?!

OP posts:
UtopiaPlanitia · 12/05/2024 23:36

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2024 23:21

I believe that the performers had been told not to fly the NB flag (not sure of details but I doubt it was a specific NB flag ban, more a general political/activist flag ban) so his doing so was by way of a protest. That also explains why he was waving it around so prominantly during the voting, also the odd small rainbow/trans flags popping up from other performers.

On the final night the Ireland, Switzerland and Latvia entourages held progress pride flags and NB flags. In the first semifinal the Ireland entry held a trans flag in front of her every time the cameras went to the green room (plus her trans flag bikini) and the Denmark entourage had a drag queen with a trans flag hand-fan.

Even if the various countries’ entourages were told not to display political flags or slogans it’s not exactly a very politically brave/daring thing to do to fly a gender identity flag at Eurovision 😬

Comedy Dating GIF by CBC
SwedishKvinnaboske · 12/05/2024 23:30

NameChange0101010101 · 12/05/2024 21:24

I encountered this recently- very right-on bloke talking with me and a couple about the couple's female teenager, who has never identified as anything else.

He was at pains to keep referring to her as 'they', presumably to show that he wasn't making any assumptions.

I now wish I'd called him on his blatant misgendering.

If he wasn't going on what was obvious before his very eyes, how arrogant of him to assume that she identified as a human - and treat her as such.

If he hadn't been so bigoted in his narrow-minded anthroponormative assumptions, he may well have discovered that she identified as an ocelot, or an oak tree, or the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread