Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Are you voting in the next general election purely on the transgender issue?

958 replies

TeacherAnonymous123 · 30/04/2024 12:54

Just as the title says really! Is that your only thought about who you'll vote for, or will you look at wider policies? Been getting lots of information through my letter box recently, and none mention it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:48

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:45

Oh, you are one of those Brexit bores still banging on years later <yawn>

No, I've moved on. I'm just pointing out that it is total nonsense to say that the UK electorate couldn't have been consulted on roughly how hard they wanted to be Brexited.

It was never all up for negotiation.

There was the hard version (with the tricky Irish border issue to sort out) or the soft version.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:46

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:35

This might well come back to bite you! How embarrassing to say you are better informed than literally everyone else! 😂
Does it make you uncomfortable to see France choose in a similar way to Italy?

We have a house in France and everyone in our village is planning to vote for her - even the ones that can’t stand her, the consider macron to be a technocratic leader and not one that actually represents their interests in any way. It’s in the south, so mostly macron territory if you like.

I've lived in France for almost a decade and will be voting in the next election.

The village where you have a holiday home is not what will determine the outcome of the election. (And many French people are very much grandes gueules when talking about who they are going to vote for; what they actually do in the privacy of the voting booth is a completely different story.)

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:45

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:43

No, the potential outcomes of Brexit were known from the outset by anyone with even a smidgen of understanding about how the EU works.

It's a rules based organisation.

Rule 1 of this rules based organisation is that in order to be part of the single market and customs union you have to accept free movement of goods, services, people and capital. These four freedoms are indivisible, you can't have some without the others.

Rule 2 is that there needs to be a border between any country which is inside and any country which is outside.

Everything else is window dressing.

If you understood these two rules it was obvious from the outset what potential outcomes would be possible.

It's not so much that the EU wanted to discourage others from leaving. It's the fact that their entire structure would collapse if they allowed even one country to be an exception to the rules in this way. There's literally no good reason why they would do that.

Edited

Oh, you are one of those Brexit bores still banging on years later <yawn>

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:43

AstonsDataThief · 02/05/2024 07:37

The UK government didn’t have the power to decide that any more than an independent Scotland could decide what trade barriers or border the rUK could impose. The outcome of Brexit was the result of negotiations between the UK and an intransigent EU determined not to encourage others to leave.

No, the potential outcomes of Brexit were known from the outset by anyone with even a smidgen of understanding about how the EU works.

It's a rules based organisation.

Rule 1 of this rules based organisation is that in order to be part of the single market and customs union you have to accept free movement of goods, services, people and capital. These four freedoms are indivisible, you can't have some without the others.

Rule 2 is that there needs to be a border between any country which is inside and any country which is outside.

Everything else is window dressing.

If you understood these two rules it was obvious from the outset what potential outcomes would be possible.

It's not so much that the EU wanted to discourage others from leaving. It's the fact that their entire structure would collapse if they allowed even one country to be an exception to the rules in this way. There's literally no good reason why they would do that.

cordeliachaseatemyhandbag · 02/05/2024 07:41

Yes, at least that plus Scottish independence.

Women's rights and unionism are 2 red lines for me.

AstonsDataThief · 02/05/2024 07:37

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 05:55

I hate to be that person, but actually anyone with reasonable knowledge of how the EU actually works could have told you what options would be on the table. Soft Brexit (the Norway model) or Hard Brexit (with a side dish of "oh fuck what do we do about the border in Ireland).

There were never going to be any other choices available.

The UK government didn’t have the power to decide that any more than an independent Scotland could decide what trade barriers or border the rUK could impose. The outcome of Brexit was the result of negotiations between the UK and an intransigent EU determined not to encourage others to leave.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:36

Zonder · 02/05/2024 07:30

This.

It's a no from me. Anyone who thinks the Tories are probably women needs to give their head a wobble.

They have had three female PMs. How many leaders have been female under Labour?

< tumbleweed>

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:35

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:28

Everyone in France knows that Le Pen isn't capable of actually running the country, which is why there will be lots of talk about how she might win, but when push comes to shove she will lose, just like she loses every election.

This might well come back to bite you! How embarrassing to say you are better informed than literally everyone else! 😂
Does it make you uncomfortable to see France choose in a similar way to Italy?

We have a house in France and everyone in our village is planning to vote for her - even the ones that can’t stand her, the consider macron to be a technocratic leader and not one that actually represents their interests in any way. It’s in the south, so mostly macron territory if you like.

Zonder · 02/05/2024 07:30

Mariannas · 30/04/2024 13:18

I think we need to bear in mind that this shit show happened under a Tory government

This.

It's a no from me. Anyone who thinks the Tories are probably women needs to give their head a wobble.

EasternStandard · 02/05/2024 07:29

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:25

Yeah it's an odd one. On several occasions whilst living in France I've had people text me to ask if I'm OK because they've read in the UK media that the whole of France is on fire and I haven't been aware of what is supposedly happening. The gilet jaune protests were quite something for a couple of months (only at weekends) but people in the UK seemed to be under the impression that it was still ongoing months after it had finished and that this was a sign that Macron's leadership was fucked. Well, no, Macron held out for longer than the gilets jaunes did, he passed his reforms and then he won another term.

I think British people don't really understand the French mentality, i.e. the fact that they love to complain and shout and protest and this is completely normal for them, not a sign that society has broken down (even if they are complaining that society has broken down), and yes most French people always hate the government even if it is the government that they personally voted into office just a few weeks ago, but they also want their public services to run. Very few of them actually like chaos.

But I also think the UK media massively ham up whatever is happening in France because the British public like to console themselves about the shit show that is the UK by saying, "Oh well, it could be worse, at least it's not as bad as it is in France."

It’s not just the U.K. media, other outlets predict shifts too

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:28

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:26

What is strange is how you seem to have conflated Le Pen’s potential win with the collapse of France?!

France isn’t going to collapse - it is remaining true to its democratic values which is protective and the safest way for any society to display their disapproval and seek change.

Everyone in France knows that Le Pen isn't capable of actually running the country, which is why there will be lots of talk about how she might win, but when push comes to shove she will lose, just like she loses every election.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:27

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:20

That’s what the political analyst say. France it seems has had enough.

The political analysts have to justify their existence somehow.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:26

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 06:09

People in the UK say Le Pen is probably going to win the next election in France every single time. It hasn't come close to happening yet. I wouldn't believe anything you read in the UK media about France in general. They seem determined to portray France as a civilisation permanently on the verge of collapse, which just isn't true in reality.

What is strange is how you seem to have conflated Le Pen’s potential win with the collapse of France?!

France isn’t going to collapse - it is remaining true to its democratic values which is protective and the safest way for any society to display their disapproval and seek change.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:25

Snowypeaks · 02/05/2024 06:56

I've always wondered why that is (media bias v France, I mean).

Yeah it's an odd one. On several occasions whilst living in France I've had people text me to ask if I'm OK because they've read in the UK media that the whole of France is on fire and I haven't been aware of what is supposedly happening. The gilet jaune protests were quite something for a couple of months (only at weekends) but people in the UK seemed to be under the impression that it was still ongoing months after it had finished and that this was a sign that Macron's leadership was fucked. Well, no, Macron held out for longer than the gilets jaunes did, he passed his reforms and then he won another term.

I think British people don't really understand the French mentality, i.e. the fact that they love to complain and shout and protest and this is completely normal for them, not a sign that society has broken down (even if they are complaining that society has broken down), and yes most French people always hate the government even if it is the government that they personally voted into office just a few weeks ago, but they also want their public services to run. Very few of them actually like chaos.

But I also think the UK media massively ham up whatever is happening in France because the British public like to console themselves about the shit show that is the UK by saying, "Oh well, it could be worse, at least it's not as bad as it is in France."

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:20

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 06:09

People in the UK say Le Pen is probably going to win the next election in France every single time. It hasn't come close to happening yet. I wouldn't believe anything you read in the UK media about France in general. They seem determined to portray France as a civilisation permanently on the verge of collapse, which just isn't true in reality.

That’s what the political analyst say. France it seems has had enough.

EasternStandard · 02/05/2024 07:03

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 06:09

People in the UK say Le Pen is probably going to win the next election in France every single time. It hasn't come close to happening yet. I wouldn't believe anything you read in the UK media about France in general. They seem determined to portray France as a civilisation permanently on the verge of collapse, which just isn't true in reality.

Don’t they do polls? What die they say

Not that polls are always accurate

Snowypeaks · 02/05/2024 06:56

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 06:09

People in the UK say Le Pen is probably going to win the next election in France every single time. It hasn't come close to happening yet. I wouldn't believe anything you read in the UK media about France in general. They seem determined to portray France as a civilisation permanently on the verge of collapse, which just isn't true in reality.

I've always wondered why that is (media bias v France, I mean).

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 06:09

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 06:02

It’s interesting to see the political developments in the EU and the huge swing to the far right. I feel relieved we are listening to our people in the U.K., and their fears, and responding with referendums and in a democratic way or we would be facing the same fate as France for example. Where it looks very likely Marine ke pen will win this time.

People in the UK say Le Pen is probably going to win the next election in France every single time. It hasn't come close to happening yet. I wouldn't believe anything you read in the UK media about France in general. They seem determined to portray France as a civilisation permanently on the verge of collapse, which just isn't true in reality.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 06:02

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 05:55

I hate to be that person, but actually anyone with reasonable knowledge of how the EU actually works could have told you what options would be on the table. Soft Brexit (the Norway model) or Hard Brexit (with a side dish of "oh fuck what do we do about the border in Ireland).

There were never going to be any other choices available.

It’s interesting to see the political developments in the EU and the huge swing to the far right. I feel relieved we are listening to our people in the U.K., and their fears, and responding with referendums and in a democratic way or we would be facing the same fate as France for example. Where it looks very likely Marine ke pen will win this time.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 05:55

AstonsDataThief · 01/05/2024 22:31

It was, however, their fault for not defining what Brexit would look like prior to the referendum

The ‘Brexit’ campaigners could no more lay out what Brexit would look like prior to a referendum than the SNP can dictate what Scottish independence would look like. That would depend on the governments elected into power over the next few years and the terms agreed with the other party (EU/rUK). You can’t even say what you would accept from negotiations as that would be immediately taken by the other side as the starting point for negotiations, not the end point. The same holds true of ‘remain’ - no one could tell at the point of the referendum what a subsequent government would do.

I hate to be that person, but actually anyone with reasonable knowledge of how the EU actually works could have told you what options would be on the table. Soft Brexit (the Norway model) or Hard Brexit (with a side dish of "oh fuck what do we do about the border in Ireland).

There were never going to be any other choices available.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 05:47

TooBigForMyBoots · 02/05/2024 00:35

The thing is though that the Conservatives at least began to backtrack and put the brakes on. The other major parties did not.

That's not true. Since the Isla Bryson case and the Cass Review other major parties are backtracking and putting the brakes on. It's just when they do it, it's called "reverse ferreting" on FWR.

We haven’t seen Labour or the Liberal Democrat’s do that. Labour have not moved at all on the issue. It’s exactly the same as it was before, and no doubt if they are voted in god only knows what they will do on the trans issue. Rewind all if the progress we have made. We will be silenced again on here - as we were before and erased in every conceivable way. What woman could possibly vote for that? Labour really really couldn’t care less about real women. We are nothing. Invisible.

TooBigForMyBoots · 02/05/2024 00:35

The thing is though that the Conservatives at least began to backtrack and put the brakes on. The other major parties did not.

That's not true. Since the Isla Bryson case and the Cass Review other major parties are backtracking and putting the brakes on. It's just when they do it, it's called "reverse ferreting" on FWR.

ThePenguinIsDrunk · 02/05/2024 00:20

I'm spoiling my ballot. I can't vote green or Labour and while the conservatives sound good on sex/gender issues they would be a catastrophe for most in every other way.

PhDinaseive · 01/05/2024 23:10

Grammarnut · 01/05/2024 16:39

No. I am worried about the direction of the NHS and the welfare state (such as is left) under the Conservatives, who have shown they care little for these things (obviously do not realise even Tory voters use the NHS?). So I shall reluctantly vote Labour, then fight over the trans issue if it is necessary - but Starmer has accepted the Cass review, so maybe they realise trans is a vote loser?

It's not a vote loser I'd you're still going to vote Labour

AstonsDataThief · 01/05/2024 22:31

It was, however, their fault for not defining what Brexit would look like prior to the referendum

The ‘Brexit’ campaigners could no more lay out what Brexit would look like prior to a referendum than the SNP can dictate what Scottish independence would look like. That would depend on the governments elected into power over the next few years and the terms agreed with the other party (EU/rUK). You can’t even say what you would accept from negotiations as that would be immediately taken by the other side as the starting point for negotiations, not the end point. The same holds true of ‘remain’ - no one could tell at the point of the referendum what a subsequent government would do.