Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

'Chestfeeding' to be banned in NHS crackdown

159 replies

RoyalCorgi · 27/04/2024 20:35

Victoria Atkins is going to demand that NHS trusts stop using terms like chestfeeding, according to the Telegraph.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/27/nhs-to-limit-trans-ideology-with-new-constitution/

‘Chestfeeding’ to be banned in NHS crackdown

The health service is to limit trans ideology with new constitution

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/27/nhs-to-limit-trans-ideology-with-new-constitution

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Twoshoesnewshoes · 27/04/2024 23:52

OMG
the article is so promising! This is really really good news, though like pps I daren’t believe it at this point.

Dineasair · 27/04/2024 23:43

OpusGiemuJavlo · 27/04/2024 23:22

Yes.

I think it's right and good that the sadly damaged and delusional young women who have been lied to and told that they will find true happiness in pretending to be men are still able to access sex-appropriate treatment so the NHS should train staff to be able to use this "sex neutral" language if they are dealing with a patient who will be upset by hearing (accurate) female terminology.

However it must not be the default that the vast majority of women have to go along with. They need simple and accurate terminology that correctly refers to their female bodies without a word salad. That doesn't stop those who need a word salad from asking for it.

I do not approve of the announcement of sex-neutral language being banned. It should not be banned, it just shouldn't be the default, and should only be used for those who need it.

NHS leaflets are produced in Urdu and Polish and Ukrainian and dozens of other languages. They can easily produce a separate version in sex-neutral terminology with a small print run so that everyone gets the information they need in a format they can access.

No! That fucked up nonsense is what got us here in the first place. Human beings can’t change sex and if you are pregnant then your a woman, if you are feeding a baby it’s from your female breasts. Men shouldn’t be attempting to get babies to ingest hormone laden secretions from their chests for validation in the first place. Women are told to be very careful what we are ingesting as it can go to the baby through the breast milk, so why is a cocktail of synthetic hormones like that allowed? They have no idea what the long term consequences will be, that’s not safe. If anyone says that’s unkind then they are putting the validation of adults before the safety of babies, end of story. Sorry, but the whole thing has to be banned and only easily understood factual language used for everyone in a health care setting, no exceptions, we need to stop mollycoddling.

OpusGiemuJavlo · 27/04/2024 23:22

JellySaurus · 27/04/2024 21:36

The compelled speech is people being compelled to pretend that women, their breasts, and their uniquely female ability to breastfeed, do not exist.

If a transman mother wants natal care and breastfeeding support that does not mention terminology they reject or feel upset by, they are not compelled to accept accurate terminology. That support, written or spoken, can be provided using woman-erasing language if that person needs it. But it must not be the default. Woman-eating language harms women.

Yes.

I think it's right and good that the sadly damaged and delusional young women who have been lied to and told that they will find true happiness in pretending to be men are still able to access sex-appropriate treatment so the NHS should train staff to be able to use this "sex neutral" language if they are dealing with a patient who will be upset by hearing (accurate) female terminology.

However it must not be the default that the vast majority of women have to go along with. They need simple and accurate terminology that correctly refers to their female bodies without a word salad. That doesn't stop those who need a word salad from asking for it.

I do not approve of the announcement of sex-neutral language being banned. It should not be banned, it just shouldn't be the default, and should only be used for those who need it.

NHS leaflets are produced in Urdu and Polish and Ukrainian and dozens of other languages. They can easily produce a separate version in sex-neutral terminology with a small print run so that everyone gets the information they need in a format they can access.

Otterly2 · 27/04/2024 23:18

illinivich · 27/04/2024 21:56

Ministers are very good at writing strongly worded letters, and public funded organisations are very good at putting them in the bin, knowing ministers will be blamed if anything goes wrong.

Yes indeed. No celebrations from me on this until I see it happening.

lonelywater · 27/04/2024 23:15

mumda · 27/04/2024 23:11

This is assuming the madness goes away..there's many other countries infested too.

It surely cannot stand-it's all complete bollocks.

mumda · 27/04/2024 23:11

lonelywater · 27/04/2024 20:47

how long before we look back at all this and think "what the fuck was that about?" 5 years? ten years?

This is assuming the madness goes away..there's many other countries infested too.

PriOn1 · 27/04/2024 23:10

I’ll be so glad if they do stop. Quite apart from the whole “taking away our language” and dehumanising us thing, their terminology is ugly. Chest feeding and bodyfeeding both sound grim. People with “female bodypart of choice” is clumsy. If someone can make it all go away, I would be eternally grateful!

Rightsraptor · 27/04/2024 23:00

The DT article talks of an eight week consultation, which I'm assuming will be public.

FranticFrankie · 27/04/2024 22:37

Next on the list- ‘pregnant people’ needs to go

Mairzydotes · 27/04/2024 22:36

KnickerlessParsons · 27/04/2024 21:12

Perhaps they'll stop inviting "anyone who has a cervix" to have smear tests now too then, and save some ink by just inviting women.

And they don't even invite ' anyone' with a cervix , it's a rather limited age group.

Edit- it's over 25 and under 64

borntobequiet · 27/04/2024 22:33

Betweenthe2 · 27/04/2024 21:16

I thought you were against policing language and compelled speech.
I guess you think it's OK when it's in a way you agree with.

We like words to mean what they’re supposed to mean and object to misleading terminology imposed as the result of people thinking that normal language constitutes some form of aggression or violence.

LiterallyOnFire · 27/04/2024 22:29

CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 27/04/2024 21:07

Wow, hopefully it will go through.

All these changes have been dizzying, but do people think they will be overturned when labour gets in ?

I won't celebrate yet.

There is a big push of Tories out there in the media saying the things that appeal to their voters with no real danger of having to follow through.

LiterallyOnFire · 27/04/2024 22:28

WagnersFourthSymphony · 27/04/2024 20:58

I recommend The Word is Woman where Milli Hill documents the crazy erasure of the word 'woman'. La Leche League is one of those so desperate to be inclusive that it seems to overlook who does the vast majority of breastfeeding.

Common Misconception
Myth: "Exclusive bodyfeeding is what every family should do"

Fact: Families should be supported to feed human milk in the capacity they desire, are able to attain, sustain and enjoy.

Reach out to a Leader, we will always reach you where you are.
^^

Great. Who wouldn't want a lactation coach in denial about who produces breast milk? If they used the terms human milk and body feeding near me I wouldn't completely trust myself to stay civil.

Xiaoxiong · 27/04/2024 22:20

I wish the government would enforce these decisions on the regulators. If Ofsted, CQC, etc had to fail schools and hospitals on their inspections because of partisan political ideologies in their literature, policies, treatment plans and curricula, I think things would change much faster.

Imagine a school having a practice Ofsted inspection where they are told "you will fail the inspection because your policies allow for social transition without clinical advice, and this isn't compliant with the Cass Report". Or a hospital is told "if the word chestfeeding appears then you will fail your inspection". That policy is going to be changed in double quick time before their inspection happens.

Whitewatergrafting · 27/04/2024 22:16

Quite right too.

Twistyripple · 27/04/2024 22:16

I just hope they follow through with it!

Toseland · 27/04/2024 22:14

So relieved to hear this news. It's been astounding that the NHS agreed to call women the most insulting names

Screamingabdabz · 27/04/2024 22:14

Betweenthe2 · 27/04/2024 21:16

I thought you were against policing language and compelled speech.
I guess you think it's OK when it's in a way you agree with.

We are. And this just returns things to correct ‘language’ and normal ‘speech’ as opposed to dystopian women-erasing nonsense.

WagnersFourthSymphony · 27/04/2024 22:11

Sooooootired01 · 27/04/2024 21:50

Being thick here...why can't you say breastfeeding?

Really? Because some people think (wrongly, as it happens) that 'breast' is a gendered word and excludes transmen, and possibly those very rare transwomen who take a cocktail of hormones to enable them to produce 'induced lactation'.

Chestfeeding (i.e. gender neutral term for breastfeeding) was, for a long time, solely associated with maternity in cisgender women (i.e. individuals who were assigned female gender at birth and identify as a woman). However, this has increasingly been put into question due to increasing availability and visibility of non-puerperal lactation induction in mothers of adopted children, partners in same-sex relationships and biological mothers of a surrogate pregnancy [1], and puerperal lactation in transgender and gender diverse individuals [2]. Transgender women (i.e. individuals assigned male gender at birth (AMAB) and who affirm their gender as female) and non-binary individuals who are AMAB may wish to chestfeed their infants and constitute a growing population. They may do so through non-puerperal lactation induction [3,4,5].
https://internationalbreastfeedingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13006-024-00624-1

Lactation induction in a transgender woman: case report and recommendations for clinical practice - International Breastfeeding Journal

Background We present a case of non-puerperal induced lactation in transgender woman. Medical literature on lactation induction for transgender women is scarce, and the majority of literature and protocols on lactation induction is based on research in...

https://internationalbreastfeedingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13006-024-00624-1#ref-CR4

Sooooootired01 · 27/04/2024 22:04

@RedToothBrush Thanks for explaining. That's absolutely ridiculous and insulting. I'm a breastfeeder (an extended one - daughter is 3).

RedToothBrush · 27/04/2024 22:02

Sooooootired01 · 27/04/2024 21:50

Being thick here...why can't you say breastfeeding?

Cos a bunch of activists colonised political parties and bullied the NHS into this quasi-religious ballcocks to be inclusive. As if you can be inclusive of males into breastfeeding. It's not about transmen either. No one gives a fuck about them unless they serve the interests of transwomens validation process.

lonelywater · 27/04/2024 22:01

CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 27/04/2024 21:07

Wow, hopefully it will go through.

All these changes have been dizzying, but do people think they will be overturned when labour gets in ?

Yep. I dont trust Starmer any further than I can piss. Any party that has Kate Osbourne in it, and allowed without let or hindrance to spout the kind of utter, utter bollocks that would be an embarrassment to a teenager is not to be trusted. Has Rosie seen even a sniff of an apology yet? Its almost as if neither WPATH or Cass had happened, or something.

ilikecatsandponies · 27/04/2024 22:00

Betweenthe2 · 27/04/2024 21:16

I thought you were against policing language and compelled speech.
I guess you think it's OK when it's in a way you agree with.

Yeah. I breastfed my babies and in the NCT, hospital etc, that was the word that everyone used.
I've seen a couple of IBCLC use 'chest feed' in a limited context meaning that if a trans man prefers to use that word about their body then they would support that person in that way, in they same way they supported me with breastfeeding.
The Tories want to make this into a culture war.

Swashbuckled · 27/04/2024 22:00

Women’s bodies are miraculous. We menstruate, ovulate, grow children inside us, make milk, and babies suckle on us for sustenance.

The mechanics and complexities that Co-create these miracles are a fucking wondrous biological symphony.

Chest feeding is the most two dimensional example of pastiche out of all of this fucking nonsense.

It’s sad and laughable in equal measure. Pathetic in the true sense. And it’s a sad little insult to life itself.

newrubylane · 27/04/2024 21:59

WagnersFourthSymphony · 27/04/2024 21:41

I recommend The Word is Woman where Milli Hill documents the crazy erasure of the word 'woman'. La Leche League is one of those so desperate to be inclusive that it seems to overlook who does the vast majority of breastfeeding.

Common Misconception
Myth: "Exclusive bodyfeeding is what every family should do"

Fact: Families should be supported to feed human milk in the capacity they desire, are able to attain, sustain and enjoy.

Reach out to a Leader, we will always reach you where you are.
https://millihill.substack.com/p/the-word-is-woman-34

They are also heavily mangling the word 'fact' here.