Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Gay Men's Network Cass Response: Public Inquiry now.

37 replies

DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter · 22/04/2024 00:38

Hey Mumset, Kavanagh interloping here again,

We've published our full response to Cass. We say it identifies the UK's part in a global homophobic medical scandal and we call for a public inquiry.

Would be most grateful for any amplification of the report or our twitter thread on the subject here.

https://x.com/MensNetwork1/status/1782172566246863340

Really grateful for any assistance and my profound thanks in advance.

All the best

Dennis Noel

https://www.gaymensnetwork.com/letters-and-responses

Letters, Responses & Press — GAY MEN'S NETWORK

https://www.gaymensnetwork.com/letters-and-responses

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
user8800 · 11/06/2024 16:52

Thank you x

Dumbledoreslemonsherbets · 11/06/2024 16:37

Thanks Dennis. Unfortunately, perhaps unsurprisingly, MN aren't going out of their way to make users aware.

BezMills · 08/06/2024 10:28

Thank you @DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter

SinnerBoy · 08/06/2024 10:11

Any chance of a bit of pro bono advice for Justine, Dennis ?

😃

DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter · 08/06/2024 10:03

Dumbledoreslemonsherbets · 06/06/2024 21:08

@DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter Hi Dennis. Big fan of your work.

I'm just slightly hijacking this thread in case you're not aware that Aston University has scraped data from here (against MN terms of service) specifically for the purpose of a phd: "A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of linguistic transphobia on Mumsnet"

i.e. it's a PhD that seems to start from the conclusion that posters on here are transphobic, which seems pretty defamatory. Using data taken against MN terms and conditions and in breach of data protection law.

Their extremely flimsy argument for continuing to use this illegal data scrape - which MN now seems to be permitting, thus breaking the terms upon which all of us signed up - is that as posters are anonymous it's ok. Even though part of the purpose of their department is to take anonymous online posts of 'extremists' and try and identify them.

However as you are not anonymous I suspect their use of any of your posts in such a PhD would be defamatory, copyright infringement and a GDPR breach.

I thought you should know.

There are quite a lot of threads on this but the first/main ones are here:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5057460-a-corpus-assisted-discourse-analysis-of-linguistic-transphobia-on-mumsnet

Site stuff threads (where Mumsnet have commented, inadequately IMO)
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5072884-corpus-2?page=14&reply=135821583

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5057903-mumsnet-corpus

Many thanks will consider the matter.

OP posts:
Dumbledoreslemonsherbets · 06/06/2024 21:08

@DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter Hi Dennis. Big fan of your work.

I'm just slightly hijacking this thread in case you're not aware that Aston University has scraped data from here (against MN terms of service) specifically for the purpose of a phd: "A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of linguistic transphobia on Mumsnet"

i.e. it's a PhD that seems to start from the conclusion that posters on here are transphobic, which seems pretty defamatory. Using data taken against MN terms and conditions and in breach of data protection law.

Their extremely flimsy argument for continuing to use this illegal data scrape - which MN now seems to be permitting, thus breaking the terms upon which all of us signed up - is that as posters are anonymous it's ok. Even though part of the purpose of their department is to take anonymous online posts of 'extremists' and try and identify them.

However as you are not anonymous I suspect their use of any of your posts in such a PhD would be defamatory, copyright infringement and a GDPR breach.

I thought you should know.

There are quite a lot of threads on this but the first/main ones are here:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5057460-a-corpus-assisted-discourse-analysis-of-linguistic-transphobia-on-mumsnet

Site stuff threads (where Mumsnet have commented, inadequately IMO)
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5072884-corpus-2?page=14&reply=135821583

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5057903-mumsnet-corpus

Cailin66 · 23/04/2024 12:03

LarkLane · 22/04/2024 22:09

If anyone is still having firewall problems, you may be able to access the full document through this rather long link.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6200252604e9795287de2ada/t/66255982bdcb1c544e3047df/1713723780268/GMN+Response+Cass+Review.pdf

Thank you for that, the first link was blocked by my corporate computer.

Crankywiddershins · 23/04/2024 11:44

DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter · 22/04/2024 17:14

I can explain this as we get it a lot. An ABSOLUTE LOAD of corporate or home firewalls block any site with "gay" in it because apparently we're a porn category. I had this issue yesterday on my phone, turned WiFi off and went 5 G and I could access it.

Oh, so you do IT support in your spare time! Thank you!

NotBadConsidering · 23/04/2024 11:11

This is great. Thanks.

LoobiJee · 22/04/2024 22:10

LarkLane · 22/04/2024 22:09

If anyone is still having firewall problems, you may be able to access the full document through this rather long link.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6200252604e9795287de2ada/t/66255982bdcb1c544e3047df/1713723780268/GMN+Response+Cass+Review.pdf

Thanks, that worked.

lemonstolemonade · 22/04/2024 20:42

Thank you Dennis!!

NonLinguisticRhetoricIsMyKryptonite · 22/04/2024 20:25

SoftDay · 22/04/2024 19:57

If somebody had told me ten years ago that a new and dreadful assault on gay and lesbian rights, and on basic tenets of child safeguarding, would come from the (self-styled) left, I wouldn't have believed it.

The cliché of all movements turning 180 and eating themselves comes to mind. It's remarkable to see it happen. (Fawcett Society, WEP, Amnesty, Women's Budget Group—too many.)

It was the left, liberationist perspective and its support for PIE and eroding child safeguarding that almost succeeded in the 90s.

Despite the arc of history showing that these things are rarely settled, I wonder if as a society that embraced progress, there was an unquestioned assumption that these struggles would never need to be fought again?

All those clichés about liberty and freedom of conscience, speech and thought rarely being givens but ideas and principles that have to be sustained and for which a respect has to be taught for every generation…

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/apr/21/salman-rushdie-warns-young-people-against-forgetting-value-of-free-speech

Salman Rushdie warns young people against forgetting value of free speech

Author also discusses prospect of second Trump presidency and writing about his stabbing in launch event for his book Knife

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/apr/21/salman-rushdie-warns-young-people-against-forgetting-value-of-free-speech

SoftDay · 22/04/2024 19:57

If somebody had told me ten years ago that a new and dreadful assault on gay and lesbian rights, and on basic tenets of child safeguarding, would come from the (self-styled) left, I wouldn't have believed it.

SoftDay · 22/04/2024 19:41

Dennis, you were fantastic in that interview with Andrew Doyle. Thank you for all you are doing to protect children. I will read the document you linked tonight. Your emphasis on child safeguarding is so important, and thank you for also standing for women.

LoobiJee · 22/04/2024 19:39

DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter · 22/04/2024 17:14

I can explain this as we get it a lot. An ABSOLUTE LOAD of corporate or home firewalls block any site with "gay" in it because apparently we're a porn category. I had this issue yesterday on my phone, turned WiFi off and went 5 G and I could access it.

Thanks Dennis. I wondered if it might be because of my broadband provider. I’ll try again when I’m using mobile data.

IsadoraBathrobe · 22/04/2024 18:26

Fantastic interview and you are right. This is an absolute scandal. Vulnerable autistic, gay and lesbian and looked after children have been utterly failed.

DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter · 22/04/2024 17:14

LoobiJee · 22/04/2024 08:10

The link isn’t opening for me, I’m getting one of those “could not establish safe connection” messages.

I can explain this as we get it a lot. An ABSOLUTE LOAD of corporate or home firewalls block any site with "gay" in it because apparently we're a porn category. I had this issue yesterday on my phone, turned WiFi off and went 5 G and I could access it.

OP posts:
MrsOvertonsWindow · 22/04/2024 15:36

Finally listened - great interviews with both you and Sarah Phillimore.

DialSquare · 22/04/2024 15:00

Thanks Dennis. I was cheering internally at everything you said. Great interview.

Dumbledoreslemonsherbets · 22/04/2024 14:31

Thank you Dennis - a great interview. I hope the BBC will invite you on the Today programme (I know I know, don't hold my breath) - wonderful to see you speak so passionately about child safeguarding.

You are absolutely right, all the DEI employees and activists with their black tie dinners aren't the ones who'll end up in pain and with life long medical issues. There really needs to be accountability.

LarkLane · 22/04/2024 14:10

Thanks DNK. An excellent and articulate interview, and a presenter who also knows what he is talking about.
Thank you for speaking up and being a constant beacon throwing light upon this terrible scandal and the individuals within it.

(Also as the mother of a gay man, I'm personally very grateful to you for the work of the network.)

allnewfor2024 · 22/04/2024 13:51

@WarriorN thanks for this, a letter will be on its way to my MP this week.
We’re dealing with the fall out on the front line at home, so this at least gives me something constructive to do about it.

WarriorN · 22/04/2024 13:30

The inquiry needs to be firmly shifted to focus on schools and those who are peddling the ideology to them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread