Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Biden administration redefines sex discrimination in Title IX to include ‘gender identity’

61 replies

IwantToRetire · 20/04/2024 01:59

President Joe Biden’s Department of Education issued new regulations on Friday, April 19, that prohibit discrimination based on a person’s “gender identity.”

The new rules, which will go into effect on Aug. 1, redefine the prohibition on sex discrimination for schools and education programs that receive federal funding — including K-12 schools and colleges and universities. Under the new interpretation of the Title IX protections, those rules now apply to any form of discrimination that is based on a person’s self-purported “gender identity.”

According to the executive summary of the Title IX revision, the changes are meant to “clarify that sex discrimination includes discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.”

The summary further states that, except in certain situations, education institutions receiving federal funding cannot carry out “different treatment or separation on the basis of sex,” which includes a prohibition on any policy or practice that “prevents a person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with their gender identity.”

More at https://ewtn.co.uk/article-biden-administration-redefines-sex-discrimination-in-title-ix-to-include-gender-identity/

The quotes above are from a Catholic news source so if that is an issue for any one, here is another version of the news.

Biden finalizes Title IX rules to boost rights of sexual assault victims, LGBTQ students

The new rules are set to take effect just a few months before the presidential election, and will apply to sex-based discrimination complaints filed on or after Aug. 1.

The rules will reverse Trump-era policies that critics say for years have bolstered the rights of people accused of sexual assault on school campuses. When Joe Biden was running for president, he described his predecessors’ Title IX regulations as a "green light to ignore sexual violence and strip survivors of their rights.”

Under the new policy, colleges will be allowed to use a lower standard to find someone guilty of sexual misconduct. The federal government will also raise its expectations of schools across the country by requiring them to quickly respond to all types of sex-based discrimination – not just to sexual harassment, which is the current threshold.

And colleges will do away with a controversial requirement for live hearings, including potentially traumatic cross-examinations between victims and those they accuse of sex-based misconduct.

More at https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2024/04/19/title-ix-biden-trump/73369449007/

Biden finalizes Title IX rules to boost rights of sexual assault victims, LGBTQ students

The Biden administration has finalized a long-awaited overhaul of Title IX, the federal law that protects students from sex-based discrimination.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2024/04/19/title-ix-biden-trump/73369449007

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
6
CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 30/04/2024 12:34

That's a good point about the economic and "soft power" benefits of the US having top athletes (for now). This really is a mess.

Grammarnut · 30/04/2024 12:15

Male athletes with DSDs are MALE and should be in the male category. I have no sympathy with the likes of Caster Semenya.

Snowypeaks · 30/04/2024 08:08

NiceNiche

Regarding replacement of women with men, the TRAs are extreme. They are just ignoring the Wrongthink and they don't care about women's sport other than as a validation tool - that's my guess. Plus US sport is a big business and stage by itself.

But they may also hope to bully world sporting bodies into changing policy. Most of the sport governing bodies have left the door open to including men in the women's category in the future (ongoing appraisal of the science) and have left in place the wedge which helps force men in - the inclusion of male athletes with DSDs.

Grammarnut · 30/04/2024 08:05

The statement is insidious. On the surface you say, ok, gender whatnot is protected as is sexual orientation. Then you read it again and see it is a total attack on women's rights and women's programmes. Biden is a creep. How has the US ended up with two creeps standing for POTUS?

Snowypeaks · 30/04/2024 07:57

That's what I have been saying. Apart from the unfairness, the definition of sex is nonsensical and the provision unworkable.

LogicLoverLlama · 30/04/2024 06:52

This will go to the Supreme Court and won't last 6 months. Not to mention Trump probably winning in November (double edged sword)

Delphinium20 · 30/04/2024 02:35

Reem Alsalem deserves a Nobel

NiceNiche · 30/04/2024 01:35

I completely agree with all the above comments. It is quite extraordinary that Biden has done this.

What I can’t see is how they haven’t thought longer term. If ‘Womens’ sport in USA, from grassroots upwards, has quantities of boys/men out performing the girls/women, than where does America think it’s going to get its world beating female athletes from? Their top performing athletes will be unable to represent them on the world stage, as so many sporting organisations are blocking opposite sex individuals as male performance levels are unfair.

GenderlessVoid · 30/04/2024 01:00

Reem Alsalem, the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, criticized the new regulations, saying that they "run contrary to the United States’ obligations under international human rights law."

“The erroneous redefinition of “sex” through these implementing regulations constitutes a grave setback that will increase the vulnerability of the majority of women and girls to incursions into their privacy, including voyeurism, sexual harassment and physical and sexual attacks, by effectively removing single sex spaces,” said Reem Alsalem, the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls.

Alsalem said the new regulations run contrary to the United States’ obligations under international human rights law to prohibit and prevent discrimination based on sex, which in its common meaning can only be taken to mean “biological sex.”
^^
She said the regulations could also deviate from other international human rights obligations that the United States has towards safeguarding the rights of female students to privacy and their right to the highest standards of mental and physical health.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/04/united-states-redefinition-sex-title-ix-will-foster-more-violence-and

Delphinium20 · 26/04/2024 20:51

IwantToRetire · 26/04/2024 19:30

Surprisingly, the very small Green party and the very small Communist party in my state is opposed to gender identity replacing sex in law.

Thanks Delphinium - that's really interesting and not the sort of detail that gets reported in the UK

Having 2 main parties seems the worst way of having "democratic" elections in any country.

It's not really reported here! You have to dig deep to find it in their meeting minutes.

IwantToRetire · 26/04/2024 19:30

Surprisingly, the very small Green party and the very small Communist party in my state is opposed to gender identity replacing sex in law.

Thanks Delphinium - that's really interesting and not the sort of detail that gets reported in the UK

Having 2 main parties seems the worst way of having "democratic" elections in any country.

OP posts:
JanesLittleGirl · 26/04/2024 18:54

If God had meant Americans to have a President, He would have given them a Candidate.

Delphinium20 · 26/04/2024 18:53

I'm a US citizen and when I go to the polls it will be for Biden. There's no other option, IMO, because of my concerns for the climate and health care and guns (all three negatively impacting women and children the most). And abortion rights. I also vote Biden because of the danger of a Republican stacking the courts with anti-choice judges (it's not just the supreme court, the president can appoint a lot of lower court judges).

However, I won't reflexively vote for Democrats my local elections - I vote for the person who's most aware of the dangers of gender woo in the schools and sports teams. Surprisingly, the very small Green party and the very small Communist party in my state is opposed to gender identity replacing sex in law. I'm on the left anyway, might as well go all Marxist.

IwantToRetire · 26/04/2024 18:42

I know that a lot of threads end up on here saying anyone who votes Tory because Labour cant be trusted on women's sex based rights are called all sorts of traitores.

But imagine being in the US and to stop Biden's trans rights first position the only option is to vote Trump.

(Article is interesting in highlighting the impact on schools. Thanks)

OP posts:
lifeturnsonadime · 26/04/2024 18:28

He's a disgrace , he knows the impact of this on women & girls because women like Riley Gaines have been telling him.

Still doesn't give an actual fuck about women.

Absolutely abhorrent.

I feel so sorry for women & girls in the US. The overturning of Roe v Wade and now this. This is simply a wholesale attack on women's rights coming from every political direction.

CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 21/04/2024 20:59

Boombatty · 21/04/2024 06:54

Would that include pronouns? If you're not allowed to call a man "he" would that be against the first amendment?

I can't imagine misgendering being a crime given the first amendment, but who knows with the world we're living in. Maybe if someone could prove they incurred loss of earnings because you repeatedly misgendered someone or something like that.

This honestly makes me feel physically sick, title 9 was one of the few pieces of major legislation that made me feel like women and girls were an important part of American society. Ever since Brett kavanaugh I've given up any hope for a real, fair future for women in the US.

BruFord · 21/04/2024 20:53

Crouton19 · 20/04/2024 08:39

Biden has handed the Republicans their election campaign right there. Utterly tone deaf.

That’s exactly what my DH said when we were discussing this yesterday (we live in the US). Biden has potentially lost himself a huge swathe of votes. It’s so depressing and frightening.

OP posts:
DuesToTheDirt · 21/04/2024 20:44

StainlessSteelMouse · 21/04/2024 01:11

Riley Gaines sets it out

That's chilling.

IwantToRetire · 21/04/2024 20:42

Blush There are so many terrible typos that am reposting my comment just upthread as it makes no sense - sorry.

Based on this quote from the first article I linked in the OP:

According to the executive summary of the Title IX revision, the changes are meant to “clarify that sex discrimination includes discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.”

The definition of sex in US law now includes gender identity. If it didn't they couldn't have revised Title IX to say it did.

A bit like how the GRA interacted with the EA so the UK now has "legal sex" eg re representation of boards etc., but (unlike Title IX as amemded) also has biological sex as per the SSE.

Are there any single sex exemptions in the revision, if not, then by implication sex discrimination in the US classifies gender identity as being the same as sex

OP posts:
Crouton19 · 21/04/2024 20:20

Why are these politicians so totally stupid as to think that 'sex discrimination' can also mean all these things which ARE NOT SEX.

It's like saying that discrimination on the basis of religious or philosophical belief includes discrimination on the basis of whether you love or hate marmite, whether it should be called Snickers or Marathon and whether the loo roll should face towards or away the person sitting on the WC. FFS!!!

IwantToRetire · 21/04/2024 20:06

Based on this quote from the first article I linked in the OP:

According to the executive summary of the Title IX revision, the changes are meant to “clarify that sex discrimination includes discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.”

The definition of sex in US law now included gender identity. If it didn't they could have revised Title IX to say it did.

A bit like how the GRA interacted with the EA so the UK now has "legal sex" eg re representation of boards etc., but (unlike Title IX as amemded) also has biological sex as per the SSE.

Are there any single sex exemptions in the revision, if not, then by implication sex discrimination in the US classifyies gender identity as being the same as sex.

OP posts:
NoWordForFluffy · 21/04/2024 19:43

Lion400 · 21/04/2024 19:30

Yes. Same for the UK.

Yep. Thought that as I typed it!

Lion400 · 21/04/2024 19:30

NoWordForFluffy · 21/04/2024 19:27

Yeah. That's true.

Shit choice for America again though, isn't it?

Yes. Same for the UK.