Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is "openly Jewish" a hate crime under the April Fools Scottish hate crime law?

388 replies

lechiffre55 · 19/04/2024 19:59

A Metropolitan police officer threatened to arrest a man for being "Openly Jewish" in London. Is this a hate crime in Scotland under the new hate crime laws?

I think it is. Could someone report it for me please I find it incredibly offensive and racist. I want to see what happens when Scottish Police try to get involved with racist actions taken by the Metropolitan Police.

https://twitter.com/Jebadoo2/status/1781393179683483960

https://twitter.com/Jebadoo2/status/1781393179683483960

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
LadyGooGaa · 20/04/2024 17:25

It’s hideous being Jewish at the moment. I’ve always been at the end of casual racism, even though I’m not visibly Jewish, whatever that means - the hatred towards a country that is no worse or better than many other countries is only because it’s a Jewish country. People can deny it all they want - but it’s true.

RebelliousCow · 20/04/2024 17:24

neilyoungismyhero · 19/04/2024 23:05

Really? In the middle of a pro Palestinian march..just because you can doesn't mean you should.

Apparently Pro-Palestinian marches have nothing to do with anti semitism - and yet a surprising number of participants ( and the police too, it seems) have a hard time knowing the difference between different things - as they slip side between hating on Israel, to hating on 'zionists', to hating on Jews.

quantumbutterfly · 20/04/2024 15:30

lechiffre55 · 20/04/2024 13:15

I'm going to try and play the both sides here a little.
The policeman in my opinion did genuinely fear for the safety and life of the Jewish man if he got close to the protestors. I agree with the policeman on this I do believe the life of the Jewish man would have been at risk.
Where I very strongly disagree with the policeman is in accepting that risk, and how he dealt with it. The risk is from people who would break our law. It is the primary duty of the policeman to uphold our laws and values. The rights of the Jewish man were utterly ignored and trampled on by the policeman in order for the police not to have to make the effort to uphold the law.
The police should have escorted the jewish man wherever he wanted to go, and arrested anyone who threatened or attempoted violence. If the Jewish man wanted to cross the street back and forth a hundred times/all day in front of the protestors that is his right. The police's job in my opinion is to uphold his rights. What the police did was threaten to arrest him because they didn't want to bother to uphold his rights. They literally trampled all over his rights because it was less effort than to uphold them.
On the talk of the Jewish man acting provocatively. So fukking what if he did want to be provocative. What are the protests if not provocative when the life of a Jewish man is at risk from the protestors? If it's ok for them to demonstrate hostility then it's equally ok for him to do the same. I'm sick and fukking tired of the police playing favourites with who they protect and who they prosecute. A police force that is biased is no police force at all, it's political activists in uniform, and I want it to stop.
One thing the Jewish man has done incredibly well is demonstrate just how biased the whole system is. The police will turn a blind eye when it suits them, and come down like a ton of bricks when they want. This is not unbiased policing, again it's activism. Justice is supposed to be blind, not choose sides.
I applaud the Jewish man for illuminating the problem so well. The press are all over it, and the head in the sand response from the Met is clearly not cutting it. They are acutally going to have to do their fukking job now, or keep facing the limelight of intense public scrutiny. I hope heads roll and keep rolling at the top of policing until the fukkers get off their arses and start upholding the law. That is their job after all. Quite frankly if police management isn't up to upholding the law then sack them and get someone who is.
I hope this Jewish man continues to highlight this problem and I wish him all the best. In highlighting the problem he's defending my rights under the law as well as his, and I quite like my rights being defended.

this.

EdithStourton · 20/04/2024 14:51

So far as I can see, Gideon Falter was making the point that these marches contain antisemitic elements. And he made it: the police were afraid that he wasn't safe.

It's bloody shocking. I have Jewish friends and I worry for them now as I never have before.

turbonerd · 20/04/2024 14:46

Noicant · 19/04/2024 23:02

It’s appalling, if this isn’t about Jewish people and anti-semitism then any Jewish person should be completely safe. If it is about Jewish people then they are unsafe. It’s like an admission from the met that some people at the marches are anti-semetic and they will hold the victims of aggression responsible rather than the perpetrators.

Theres that Iranian dissident the police arrested for holding a “Hamas are terrorists” sign.

It’s ridiculous, people absolutely have a right to peaceful protest but people have a right to counter protest too without fear of violence or arrest.

Edited

Did they actually arrest the man?
Is this for real?

That is also shocking!

I can hardly fathom that jewish citizens of London who try to counterprotest the pro-Palestine protests which definitely have elements of antisemitism to them, are accosted like this.
It is heartbreaking

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 20/04/2024 14:20

‘Or when she went totally batshit and implied one of the marches was going to disrupt the Rememberance Day events, although the march that day was no where near any of the ceremonies’

It wasn’t going near the Cenotaph after the Police forced the organisers to change the route. That’s not quite the same.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 20/04/2024 14:10

Not buying that. I accept they needed to protect him but they wouldn't have said

Openly Muslim, openly gay.

Signalbox · 20/04/2024 14:06

I'm going to try and play the both sides here a little.
The policeman in my opinion did genuinely fear for the safety and life of the Jewish man if he got close to the protestors. I agree with the policeman on this I do believe the life of the Jewish man would have been at risk.

I think this is right. The Met know full well that an openly Jewish person is at risk of harm from elements within these marches but they don't have the officers on the ground to keep them safe if it kicks off so they attempt to remove the individual at risk because it's 1000% easier than dealing with the actual problem.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 20/04/2024 13:56

IwantToRetire · 19/04/2024 21:31

I think this makes the Met look really stupid, but have to say I think politcians have ramped up this situation, and doubt the Met or any police force, nor the ordinary person on the street would come out of this well in taking a decision on the spur of the moment.

I certainly think the Met should apologise, but I think we need to find a way to calm down the whole hate crime, dobbing people in culture that people like Braverman have provoked.

And as we know from how quick TRAs are to report someone to the police, there is no doubt this happens in other areas. For all we know someone approached the police man I said I feel threatened. (And doubt that met police are required to be educated about different religions, cultures and the importance of signifiers of that.)

In France you aren't allowed to wear anything that is seen as religious, ie women not wearing the veil, although have no idea if this means that in France Jewish men cant wear a skull cap in public.

The boroughs in the part of London I live in have had to resort to no public displays whether flags or posters reflecting support for either side in the Gaza conflict. (Not forgetting that not that long ago the English flag carried far more connotations than supporting a football team and some boroughs stopped them being displayed on housing estates they managed.)

In Northern Ireland they have the parades commission as a way of "safely" allowing parades in support of differnt communities to go ahead but only on agreed routes. (Isn't there something similar in Scotland in relation to football matches and sectarianism?)

Not meaning to downplay what happened but to expect the bobby on the beat to have the right response is in fact one of the things the Met did complain about. That the Government was franchising out to them decisions about how society should behave, but not having the intergrity to do it itself.

But as OP's question was about how the Scottish police would respond to this situation, I think the question should be asked of the politicians in Scotland who created the law. Not the muggins on the front line who have been left to as individuals interpret, or worse take advantage of to promote their own biases.

Police in Scotland decided that there was hate crime in an SNP member posting a Star of David intertwined with a swastika.

They said it couldn't be a hate crime because the person who reported it wasn't Jewish. They were wrong in the interpretation of the law (the complaint doesn't have to be from a person with the protected characteristic)

They were also wrong in fact. Nobody with a working brain cell would deny it was hateful.

lechiffre55 · 20/04/2024 13:15

I'm going to try and play the both sides here a little.
The policeman in my opinion did genuinely fear for the safety and life of the Jewish man if he got close to the protestors. I agree with the policeman on this I do believe the life of the Jewish man would have been at risk.
Where I very strongly disagree with the policeman is in accepting that risk, and how he dealt with it. The risk is from people who would break our law. It is the primary duty of the policeman to uphold our laws and values. The rights of the Jewish man were utterly ignored and trampled on by the policeman in order for the police not to have to make the effort to uphold the law.
The police should have escorted the jewish man wherever he wanted to go, and arrested anyone who threatened or attempoted violence. If the Jewish man wanted to cross the street back and forth a hundred times/all day in front of the protestors that is his right. The police's job in my opinion is to uphold his rights. What the police did was threaten to arrest him because they didn't want to bother to uphold his rights. They literally trampled all over his rights because it was less effort than to uphold them.
On the talk of the Jewish man acting provocatively. So fukking what if he did want to be provocative. What are the protests if not provocative when the life of a Jewish man is at risk from the protestors? If it's ok for them to demonstrate hostility then it's equally ok for him to do the same. I'm sick and fukking tired of the police playing favourites with who they protect and who they prosecute. A police force that is biased is no police force at all, it's political activists in uniform, and I want it to stop.
One thing the Jewish man has done incredibly well is demonstrate just how biased the whole system is. The police will turn a blind eye when it suits them, and come down like a ton of bricks when they want. This is not unbiased policing, again it's activism. Justice is supposed to be blind, not choose sides.
I applaud the Jewish man for illuminating the problem so well. The press are all over it, and the head in the sand response from the Met is clearly not cutting it. They are acutally going to have to do their fukking job now, or keep facing the limelight of intense public scrutiny. I hope heads roll and keep rolling at the top of policing until the fukkers get off their arses and start upholding the law. That is their job after all. Quite frankly if police management isn't up to upholding the law then sack them and get someone who is.
I hope this Jewish man continues to highlight this problem and I wish him all the best. In highlighting the problem he's defending my rights under the law as well as his, and I quite like my rights being defended.

OP posts:
LadyGooGaa · 20/04/2024 11:46

Some of the people commenting should be utterly ashamed of themselves. You may think you can hide your dislike of Jews/Israel/whatever and somehow justify blatant racism - but Jews see it. We see right through it. We are not naive, it was only 80 years ago that millions of normal citizens of Europe were slaughtered in the streets and towns while their neighbours watched, cheered or did nothing.
We don’t believe that the innate jealously and hatred has gone anywhere, we know it’s still there. But today with Israel in the situation it is, and with Jews being a tiny minority - these views are being given legitimacy. You can use the word Zionist if it makes you feel better, but it means the same thing. I’m not surprised but I am sad. Jews (And Israelis) have contributed so much to society yet they are hated for being successful or whatever.
Some of you need to check yourselves well, and address your deep seated antisemitism and question - why do I feel like this about Jews and not about blacks, Muslims, whatever.
Shame on you.

Signalbox · 20/04/2024 11:16

IwantToRetire · 20/04/2024 01:51

It is the policeman who is implying that the march is made up of violent anti-semitic people.

Maybe the march organisers could sue the Met.

Ha ha I can see that going well. The Met must have hard drives full of evidence that these marches harbour many extremist islamists and anti-semetic individuals who would undoubtably pose a risk to "openly jewish" people in the area.

ArabellaScott · 20/04/2024 11:01

callmej · 20/04/2024 10:56

This is horrific, but unsurprising. Every day we see yet more evidence of why Jews need their own country. These marches are absolutely terrifying, most especially because it is very clear the state is unable to stop them. So we just have to accept that we are now a country where violent anti-Semites openly crawl the streets and Jews have to hide away in fear. I am so, so ashamed of what we've become.

Jews should be perfectly able to live and participate in society in the UK, without fear.

PTSDBarbiegirl · 20/04/2024 10:58

When did London move to Scotland?

callmej · 20/04/2024 10:56

This is horrific, but unsurprising. Every day we see yet more evidence of why Jews need their own country. These marches are absolutely terrifying, most especially because it is very clear the state is unable to stop them. So we just have to accept that we are now a country where violent anti-Semites openly crawl the streets and Jews have to hide away in fear. I am so, so ashamed of what we've become.

MrTiddlesTheCat · 20/04/2024 07:56

I think he was being provocative. I also think he was right and courageous. Why should jewish people meekly accept being gaslit. These marches are antisemitic and jewish people aren't safe because of them. Well done that man for highlighting the truth.

notimagain · 20/04/2024 07:11

lechiffre55 · 19/04/2024 22:26

Isn't the French ban on/in publicly funded services/buildings not the legal sense of "in public".
e.g. it's ok to walk down a public road wearing religious garb, but you can't enter the public department of xxxxxx building with religious garb? Or am I completely wrong on that?

Hi

I must admit I thought that might also be the case when I drafted my reply last night but I could only find a definite reference to the situation in state run schools and also full face veils.

We’re not a million km from Lourdes and as a result you certainly on occasions see nuns traveling around on public transport.

EasternStandard · 20/04/2024 06:51

Morwenscapacioussleeves · 20/04/2024 00:17

WTF are you serious?!

He's living his life as a British citizen why the fuck shouldn't he be safe walking down a street?! Are you saying it's accepted that these marchers will be violent towards him & if so that the police should arrest him rather than any violent protesters?!!

It’s such a bizarre take. Would they think this for a Muslim or black person

A group threatens someone for looking a certain way and it’s not the attackers’ problem?

SgtOliviaBenson · 20/04/2024 03:16

NotAllowed · 19/04/2024 21:44

Seems like a setup to manufacture sympathy

Would it be a setup to manufacture sympathy if the man was "openly Muslim "? Or does that only apply to Jews?

IwantToRetire · 20/04/2024 02:43

" ... Gideon Falter, who heads up the Campaign Against Antisemitism, was pulled aside by police while trying to cross the road in the middle of a Gaza rally in London last Saturday.

Mr Falter said: “Britain is rightly proud of its values of tolerance and decency, and we cannot as a society accept that this is now going to be the norm.”

He said he was not criticising the frontline officers who are “put in impossible positions week in, week out”, but called on the Met Police to curtail the marches or ban them altogether. ... "

This is another version of what happened, via the Sun.

Garlicked · 20/04/2024 02:00

IwantToRetire · 20/04/2024 01:51

It is the policeman who is implying that the march is made up of violent anti-semitic people.

Maybe the march organisers could sue the Met.

Or maybe they had intel about certain members or groups within the march.

IwantToRetire · 20/04/2024 01:51

It is the policeman who is implying that the march is made up of violent anti-semitic people.

Maybe the march organisers could sue the Met.

Garlicked · 20/04/2024 01:43

Hélène79 · 19/04/2024 23:54

I know they often get it wrong where demonstrations on political or social issues are concerned. I do, though, think, it's right in principle to keep members of the opposed group at a safe distance from a legal, policed protest against them. Presumably they would do the same with anyone being 'openly Palestinian' at a pro-Israel rally.

"Opposed group"? Unless I've missed something, the guy was Jewish not Israeli! We keep being told the opposed group is Israel not British Jews! And what does "openly Palestinian" have to do with it? This guy wasn't being openly Israeli, he was just being a Jewish Londoner, walking after being at the synagogue!

All of this, yes. But I'm assuming the police had good reason to believe there were anti-Jewish people among the protesters and that this chap was at risk of harm. Like @IwantToRetire, I've been warned off (with threat of arrest) volatile situations where cops thought I could be at risk. They're there to keep the peace.

It wasn't well expressed in the moment, obviously. And the police do get things wrong sometimes, equally obviously. Maybe that chap was in no danger, I don't know - and neither does he.

It's as naïve to suppose that all of those demonstrators are against Israeli policy but not Jews, as to suppose that no pro-Israel activists are against all Arabs or Muslims. There are unreasonable people everywhere and, sadly, some of them are looking for excuses to be violent.

IwantToRetire · 20/04/2024 01:33

CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 20/04/2024 01:22

@IwantToRetire He threatened to arrest him though.

The phrase "openly Jewish" is chilling because it implies that jewishness is something to be ashamed of, there's the long history of some having to hide it to survive, and finally what about openly female? Openly black? Are they going to be threatened with arrest for walking down the street flaunting these characteristics, and then blamed if they're a victim of violence?

You have chosen not to read what I actually wrote.

The policeman was explaining why he thought it wouldn't be safe for the man to go near the demo.

It was not and I did not say it was about someone in a day to day way walking down the street.

The policeman trying to stop the potential violence has no relationship to being ashamed.

What are you trying to achieve by twisting what I have said.

It is as others have said, standard policing practice where there are "opposing" groups.

And lets face it, being "openly Black" is a day to day problem because as we all know if you are Black you are more likely to be stop and searched.

That is any everyday occurance.

A one off occurance in the proximity of a large march that the policeman categorised as violent isn't.

Sometimes something is just what it is. Not very competent police not being very competent let alone being aware of nuance.

CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 20/04/2024 01:22

@IwantToRetire He threatened to arrest him though.

The phrase "openly Jewish" is chilling because it implies that jewishness is something to be ashamed of, there's the long history of some having to hide it to survive, and finally what about openly female? Openly black? Are they going to be threatened with arrest for walking down the street flaunting these characteristics, and then blamed if they're a victim of violence?

Swipe left for the next trending thread