As you say, unfortunate for her that the records of what she actually said are in the public domain.
But I suppose lobby groups - unlike those individuals (and institutions) covered by the Nolan principles - are free to repeatedly try to sell a pack of lies, if that gets them what they are lobbying for. Which makes it so important for those covered by the Nolan principles to do some actual research - and not simply cut and paste from lobby groups’ campaign materials, or adopt their campaign materials wholesale as their organisation’s policy.
“She denied that she had ever supported “no debate”, adding: “I’m absolutely someone who has always been working in the middle ground, trying to build consensus.”
^^
Hunt’s critics may contrast that position with her response in October 2018 to a petition asking Stonewall to acknowledge there was a conflict around transgender rights and sex-based women’s rights. She wrote: “We do not and will not acknowledge this. Doing so would imply that we do not believe that trans people deserve the same rights as others. We will always debate issues that enable us to further equality but what we will not do is debate trans people’s right to exist.”
^^
The trouble with that position, critics argued, was that therapists trying to explore whether a young person’s declaration that they were transgender might actually be the result of something else, such as trauma, abuse or homophobia, fell foul of these new boundaries.
^^
In October 2017 Hunt tweeted: “Transwomen are women. It’s the sticking point on both sides I’m afraid and won’t make for a very interesting debate.”
In an opinion piece for the Independent in November 2017, she branded people raising concerns about the rise in young lesbians believing that they were born in the wrong body, “as anti-trans campaigners” deploying a “cynical tactic” amid a “public bout of transphobia”