https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-33613781
I found this fascinating.
'Two researchers analysed how men treated women while playing 163 games of Halo 3.
Men who performed poorly in the games responded by being hostile to female players.
The male winners were mostly pleasant to other players, while the losing men made unsavoury comments to female players.
"Low-status males that have the most to lose due to a hierarchical reconfiguration are responding to the threat female competitors pose," the researchers, from the University of New South Wales and the Miami University in Ohio, write. "High-status males with the least to fear were more positive."
In Halo 3, players are anonymous and only interact with each other by voice a few times during the game. Most Halo players are men.
When performing poorly, players increased negative statements toward women and submissive statements toward the men who were winning.
"As men often rely on aggression to maintain their dominant social status, the increase in hostility towards a woman by lower-status males may be an attempt to disregard a female's performance," the researchers write.'
The key thing that I took from this was the feelings of low-status males are more invested in their status compared to other males than in their relationship to women.
It's something I think interesting to consider when thinking about MVAWG in general - males lacking a father figure is one of the risk factors for abusive men.
When men are abusive to women, are they actually acting out their feelings towards other men? This would explain why so many narcissists see women as ciphers, not actual humans, too.