Not sure about this bit either:
Specifically, the suggestion on page 13 that teachers should not be compelled to use preferred pronouns may wrongly imply that the Article 9 and 10 rights to freedom of religion and/or freedom of expression of a teacher or another learner would necessarily override the rights of a child with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, which includes the right to respect for their private and family life, under Article 8. Case law suggests that employers can apply policies which require staff to recognise a trans person’s preferred pronoun, providing that this is done proportionately so as to respect the rights of all affected groups. For example, a school may legitimately take action to prevent ‘deliberate misgendering’ which causes distress or humiliation to a trans child, whilst giving reasonable consideration to other factors such as protected beliefs of staff or the level of comprehension of other children
How do you respect the right of someone to believe in sex realism while requiring them to comply with preferred pronouns which is to enact a belief they do not hold and may regard as actively harmful? This advice seems firmly weighted to one side to me.