Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Starmer backs banning tw from women's sport 🤔

156 replies

IcakethereforeIam · 11/03/2024 16:58

He seems fairly unequivocal

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2024/03/11/keir-starmer-backs-ban-on-transgender-female-competition/

https://archive.ph/4lLbf jump the paywall, don't get stuck halfway

There's a rehash of a few things at the end. That some sports have already done this except football and cricket. Apparently they are being called to parliament to explain themselves!

Keir Starmer backs ban on transgender athletes in female competition: ‘Common sense has to prevail’

Leader of the Opposition says he supports governing bodies’ actions to ban transgender women having previously refused to do so

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2024/03/11/keir-starmer-backs-ban-on-transgender-female-competition

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
RedToothBrush · 11/03/2024 21:37

Someone has been reading opinion polls.

That's all.

I wonder how Starker plans to ensure the integrity of women's sport, whilst simultaneously supporting the idea that men who claim to be women, can't be challenged cos 'transphobia'.

How's he going to actually word the law?

As I keep saying 'feelings' and 'ideas' don't make for good law. We need some actual crystal clear legal definitions...

...oh.

IcakethereforeIam · 11/03/2024 21:37

Sports in schools, they must be protected too.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 11/03/2024 21:25

And yes, there is no elite sport without grassroots sport.

ArabellaScott · 11/03/2024 21:24

JanesLittleGirl · 11/03/2024 17:23

I'm sure that someone recently wrote that Starmer spends all week saying nothing and then does U-turn the next week.

Spot on.

You need to define sex, Keir.

Mumoftwo1312 · 11/03/2024 21:18

Starmer told Telegraph Sport: “I think the important thing is that the sports governing bodies take a lead on this. And they are doing that, and we’re supportive of what they’re doing, particularly in elite sport. So, that’s where the decision should be taken. They’ve taken a number of decisions.

He's not backing any particular stance. He's washing his hands of the issue, saying the decision should be up to the sporting bodies. "That's where the decision should be taken".

The telegraph headline was wildly optimistic in its interpretation of the above words

lifeturnsonadime · 11/03/2024 20:47

How does he justify this, is it one of the biological women exceptions? If so then why not commit to the necessary amendments to the Equality Act.

Otherwise these are weasel words.

Having a daughter who is at county level in her sport I can also tell you that this is inadequate, as others have pointed out this has to be from grass roots level, otherwise there won't be any women's elite sport.

PermanentTemporary · 11/03/2024 20:34

Fine with me. Great.

woodlandtrees · 11/03/2024 20:32

Finally! But it's only because an election is coming back and this is what the majority of people think.

illinivich · 11/03/2024 20:27

He's repeating what seb coe said a while ago, so in that respect it isnt that radical - hes just following where sport is going to go anyway.

But it is a bold statement from starmer given where he was 3 minutes ago and who is standing behind him in his party.

The government are going to have to say 'especially' elite sport because they are the ones who are issuing men with female id, and writing confusing legislation making it impossible for non elite sporting events to put on female only events. This is what starmer needs to plan to sort out.

literalviolence · 11/03/2024 20:20

It's a bit rich of him to talk about 'common sense' after the pile of shit which has come out of his mouth regarding women's rights. Women don't have dicks Kier. That's fucking common sense for you.

JanesLittleGirl · 11/03/2024 20:15

While both Sir Kier Starmer and @BoiledBeetle are invertebrates, Boiled does have a gut.

Pleasealexa · 11/03/2024 20:04

What about Angela Eagle 4 promises made only last week??

Labour will:
Legislate for a trans-inclusive conversion therapy ban
Make anti-LGBT+ hate crime an aggravated offence
Modernise Gender Recognition processesAppoint an international LGBT+ envoy

i don't trust Kier

HeartofSaturdayNight · 11/03/2024 20:00

Starmer identifies with having a spine.

I'd want to know the exact meaning of every word he mutters before I trust anything that leaks out of his mouth. He doesn't seem to use words with any shared common or garden meaning.

WallaceinAnderland · 11/03/2024 19:57

Keir says words.

Based on his history of saying words, no one knows what they mean.

In trying to please everyone, he pleases no one.

Snowypeaks · 11/03/2024 19:54

Even in cycling, swimming, rugby and athletics, male athletes are allowed in female category. Either if they transitioned before puberty or if they have a DSD. I think it's only British Triathlon which completely bans males from women's competition.

Runor · 11/03/2024 19:52

Actually, at this point I need him to define exactly what he means by women and female before I’m happy that I understand exactly what he’s saying

maltravers · 11/03/2024 19:44

Starmer seems to be passing the hot potato as usual. All these political and sporting leaders are just desperate to fob the decision on this onto someone else so that they don’t get the flak. Feeble Keir, show some ba@@s for once.

maltravers · 11/03/2024 19:42

coureur · 11/03/2024 19:28

Certainly in cycling, rugby, swimming and athletics the ban on male-bodied individuals competing in the female category applies at all levels not just elite.

In my sport (cycling) we now have female and open categories. Women are free to enter the open category (and often do when there is not a big enough field to put on a women’s race) but males are specifically banned from the female races. This applies at all levels. At the youth level races are often mixed but there are always separate placings/podiums/prizes for boys and girls.

So are we going to stop seeing men on the podium as the female winner Coureur? Are they stopping male bodied people identifying into the female group in practice rather than just in theory? I’m not a competitive cyclist (I’m just a commuting one) so I wouldn’t know..? Thank you.

flyingbuttress43 · 11/03/2024 19:40

Anyone would think there is an election coming.......

He's obviously been reading the tealeaves and working out how he can say something without saying something. I don't trust his notion of common sense, which apparently doesn't run to saying a woman is an adult human female. Nice try, no cigar Starmer.

Lion400 · 11/03/2024 19:38

The Labour leader said he was “supportive” of moves to protect the female category of sporting competitions and that “common sense has to prevail in terms of safety and integrity of sport”.

“I think the important thing is that the sports governing bodies take a lead on this. And they are doing that, and we’re supportive of what they’re doing, particularly in elite sport. So, that’s where the decision should be taken. They’ve taken a number of decisions. And, in the end, common sense has to prevail in terms of safety and integrity of sport.”

🥇 Well well well Starmer yet again wins the gold medal for talking a lot yet saying nothing at all. Unless you count sloping his shoulders so much they’re practically vertical.

He gets more and more meaningless as time goes by. I thought he had promise as a Labour leader, a few years ago. How wrong I was.

coureur · 11/03/2024 19:28

Certainly in cycling, rugby, swimming and athletics the ban on male-bodied individuals competing in the female category applies at all levels not just elite.

In my sport (cycling) we now have female and open categories. Women are free to enter the open category (and often do when there is not a big enough field to put on a women’s race) but males are specifically banned from the female races. This applies at all levels. At the youth level races are often mixed but there are always separate placings/podiums/prizes for boys and girls.

duc748 · 11/03/2024 19:27

That's about the size of it, I reckon, @NowYouSee .

NowYouSee · 11/03/2024 19:24

Whilst a step in the right direction I fear this is more of Starmer trying to draft himself out of trouble which is something he has been trying to do all along. So find a form of words that makes general noises but nothing concrete. Do I think this means a Labour government would support women in this? No I don’t.

Datun · 11/03/2024 18:51

But without grassroots sports there will be no elite women’s sports

Exactly.

Swipe left for the next trending thread