Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
10
PermanentTemporary · 01/03/2024 21:27

Something I see in the girls I know who identify as boys is that there has often been group bullying or exclusion by other girls. I don't know if this is more likely in girls who are autistic.

SlumberDearMaid · 01/03/2024 20:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sweden99 · 01/03/2024 20:53

Thank you, this is eye opening.

DuesToTheDirt · 01/03/2024 20:47

@Sweden99 I am concerned, though, about women's (or, mostly, girls') motivation for transitioning. It seems that many girls transition not because they feel they are male, but to avoid abuse or unwanted attention from men. I am also massively concerned about the increasing acceptance of so-called "top-surgery", i.e. double mastectomy, which seems to be far more common than surgery for male transgender people.

My comments aren't really about what people call themselves, nor whether men should be accepted as women and welcomed into women's spaces, or vice versa for women in men's spaces, just to say that I do have massive issues with gender ideology for young women who say they are men.

SlumberDearMaid · 01/03/2024 20:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SlumberDearMaid · 01/03/2024 20:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sweden99 · 01/03/2024 20:27

Thank you for the replies. I was asking in good faith and it was kind of you to take it that way too.

Froodwithatowel · 01/03/2024 20:26

Exactly. It isn't a gender issue. It's a sex issue.

KeeeeeepDancing · 01/03/2024 20:23

If the objection that in permitting men to be declared women, that it is allowing wolves to don sheeps' clothing?
Yes

Is there much thought on female to male, or serious concerns?
No because the female transitioners pose no threat to men's safety, sports records etc.
plus the female transitioners are ironically behaving exactly like women do, and just get on with it, without making a fuss.

Stuck to your common sense. As once you see what's going on it feels like going through the looking glass, like Alice in wonderland

Sweden99 · 01/03/2024 20:16

Please, excuse me asking a dumb question. I struggle with these issues and only know one transsexual person (female to male) and I am happy for him(?).
If the objection that in permitting men to be declared women, that it is allowing wolves to don sheeps' clothing?
Is there much thought on female to male, or serious concerns?
I am a man, so I might be missing things that should be very obvious. Thank you.

AliceA2021 · 01/03/2024 19:27

Using facts is not a view or opinion. So the BBC would rather lie then and pretend men can magically change to women on a say so or feeling or by popping in a dress and lipstick.

So many lies to keep men happy.

TeenyTinyCrocodile · 01/03/2024 19:23

I currently don't have a TV licence, as I don't watch any TV that would require it. I am aware that the TV licence does also pay for other services such as radio and websites from them, which I do use. But for this reason above among others, I certainly shan't be rushing to get one again. Whatever 'man' and 'woman' are currently taken to mean, male=biologically male, in humans and all other organisms that have two sexes.

borntobequiet · 01/03/2024 19:19

Male/female: sex.
Masculine/feminine: gender.

yetanotherusernameAgain · 01/03/2024 18:56

borntobequiet · 01/03/2024 17:48

Male/female can refer to either gender or sex.

If it’s gender, it’s “masculine” or “feminine”.

To me,

  • sex
  • gender
  • masculine/feminine

are all different things.

yetanotherusernameAgain · 01/03/2024 18:54

I've submitted a complaint. (You have to include your full address and phone number(!!))

Thank you to the poster who highlighted the need to verify your email address and look out for the relevant email in your inbox. Otherwise your complaint won't be submitted.

ErrolTheDragon · 01/03/2024 18:18

BoreOfWhabylon · 01/03/2024 16:00

From TwiXter

Good. Glad it's getting pushback from within.

borntobequiet · 01/03/2024 17:48

Male/female can refer to either gender or sex.

If it’s gender, it’s “masculine” or “feminine”.

SabrinaThwaite · 01/03/2024 17:25

This might also be useful for complaints:

https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2024/03/01/the-bbc-ruling-on-justin-webb-ignoring-public-confusion-and-scientific-fact/

Interestingly (or worringly), from this group’s research fewer than 2/3rds of people understood the meaning of the terms “transgender woman” and “trans woman”.

Are Transwomen male or female? Ask the BBC
Xiaoxiong · 01/03/2024 17:15

I've written to complain as well using @AlphariusOmegron 's link. I selected "General BBC" and then "Bias" the categories.

CriticalCondition · 01/03/2024 17:06

03301234346 is the WhatsApp number for the Today programme on BBC Radio 4.

WhiteVelvet · 01/03/2024 16:58

@SabrinaThwaite Thank-you.

CriticalCondition · 01/03/2024 16:58

Thank you to PPs for posting your letters. They have inspired me to send my own to Tim Davie. And I've also sent a message of support for Justin Webb to the R4 Today programme on WhatsApp.

SabrinaThwaite · 01/03/2024 16:54

WhiteVelvet · 01/03/2024 16:37

I can’t fully see the photos. They are both cut off and won’t open or enlarge.

I’m nonethewiser as to what is being shown.

The text from Robert Jessell tweet:

Word is that the BBC newsroom is in absolute uproar over the BBC's upholding of the complaint against Justin Webb.

Just a reminder that the broadcaster isn't a monolith. There are plenty of Justin Webbs at the BBC

ScrollingLeaves · 01/03/2024 16:51

AlphariusOmegron · 01/03/2024 12:16

My complaint letter

Letter of Complaint to the BBC
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my deep dissatisfaction and anger regarding the BBC's recent decision to uphold a complaint against Justin Webb for his comments during a discussion on the International Chess Federation guidelines. This decision not only undermines the very essence of factual reporting but also sets a dangerous precedent for the distortion of impartiality within your broadcasting.
Asserting facts should never be conflated with imparting opinion. The necessity for impartiality lies in the realm of subjective debate, not in the dissemination of verifiable truths. To illustrate, stating that the Earth is not flat but spherical is a reflection of scientific consensus, not a breach of impartiality. Similarly, the discussion of biological realities should not be deemed partial or biased.
The implication of your ruling suggests an alarming shift towards a landscape where factual accuracy is sacrificed at the altar of perceived impartiality. This not only misguides the public but also compromises the integrity of journalism. The case in question, where biological distinctions were made in the context of a sports advantage discussion, should not be misconstrued as bias but recognized as a necessary part of factual discourse.
By upholding this complaint, the BBC inadvertently signals that acknowledging biological sex in any context may violate your impartiality guidelines. This stance is not only scientifically untenable but also a disservice to the public's right to informed and accurate reporting.
I urge you to reconsider this decision and the broader implications it holds for journalistic integrity and the pursuit of truth. Your commitment to impartiality should not entail a disregard for factual accuracy.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]

Such a clear letter, thank you for the example you set here both in writing it and its content.

SabrinaThwaite · 01/03/2024 16:50

I’ve also complained:

I am appalled that Justin Webb has been found in breach of the BBC guidelines on impartiality for stating ‘trans women, in other words males’.

To try and frame this as ‘endorsing one viewpoint in a highly controversial area’ because it was ‘without qualification as to gender or biological sex’ is quite frankly nonsense.

The World Health Organisation defines the terms ‘woman’ and ‘man’ as referring to gender and ‘male’ and ‘female’ to biological sex, therefore Webb’s statement is factually accurate and correct.

Under the WHO definitions, it is clear that Webb was clarifying that a trans woman’s gender (woman) is not the same as their biological sex (male) and therefore no further clarification was appropriate or necessary.

When I listen to R4 Today I want to hear clarity and facts, not obfuscation. Stating a fact and by doing so clarifying that trans women are males in a discussion about males entering the female category in sporting competitions is what I would expect a R4 presenter to do - otherwise people who do not know that trans women are male would not understand the discussion.

If the BBC’s remit is to remain to ‘inform and educate’ then you should at least allow your staff to accurately state facts.

So sick of this shit.

Swipe left for the next trending thread