Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Do you count GC feminists as LGBT?

317 replies

AdamRyan · 21/02/2024 14:20

Apparently Kemi Badenoch is a bit confused about the difference, claiming wide consultation with LGBT groups but actually only meeting GC feminist groups.

https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1760281735990738972?s=20

It reminds me a bit of when Maria Miller did the consultation on trans rights and didn't consult any feminists.

I would expect MPs to be consulting both sides, but more than that I'm kind of offended to be described as LGBT for my GC stance Confused. Seems unfair to both gay people and feminists and like the old anti-feminist "you are all hairy lesbians" trope

https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1760281735990738972?s=20

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
AdamRyan · 22/02/2024 00:30

Also because I've been here for so long I know the problem isn't me. This relentless accusatory "bad faith/reflect on your style" thing is new, it's only really with posters who hang out on this board and it's not something that's been raised before for most of my (fairly prolific) MN posting history.

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 22/02/2024 00:24

LimeViewer · 22/02/2024 00:10

The glaring issue here is your posting history though. I see you've finally accepted you do indeed hold some gc views. Well done.

lime I've been posting here for over 10 years. I had to delete an old account on here after I got quoted on twitter by a TRA for my "transphobia". I'm completely comfortable with my GC views because I've held them for years and argued the toss plenty of times.

I'm not popular on here now because 1) I'm too "lite" and 2) I'm too "lefty" (despite the protestations this isn't a right wing board and that's a TRA smear).

The only person on the receiving end of being accused of bad faith/ sealioning/ stupid/ disingenuous/ tribal blah blah is me. I'm not dishing that out, whatever people say about me calling them a nazi (which I never would do). It's a bit tiring but also makes me dig my heels in because I hate bullying and I think echo chambers are destroying humanity.

I am pretty much ready to give up on FWR to be honest which is a shame because the women on here taught me a lot about feminism. But hey ho. Nothing lasts for ever and being unpleasant to other women is obviously now the done thing.

OP posts:
LimeViewer · 22/02/2024 00:21

Also in general your posting would have made more sense in the past had you clarified you were a radical feminist like firestone / purdy rather than greer, because some extreme radical feminist arguments do overlap with tra positions.

AdamRyan · 22/02/2024 00:15

Oneofthesurvivors · 22/02/2024 00:03

I can't stand Badenoch and nothing would posses me to vote tory. My comment had nothing to do with defending her.

OK, I apologise. I thought you were claiming that her only meeting GC feminists was fine.

I don't know what I've written that would give the impression i don't think there are lesbian or bi women in GC groups. Clearly there are.
I don't think you can refer to GC groups as LGBT groups, as she appears to have done. Hence my question:
Do you count GC feminists (I should have said feminist groups probably) as LGBT?

If you do, why?

OP posts:
FlirtsWithRhinos · 22/02/2024 00:15

NoBinturongsHereMate · 21/02/2024 17:05

It's assumptions all the way down.

(Yes, I know these are tortoises not turtles - the GIF library is lacking.)

❤️ for my favourote saying

LimeViewer · 22/02/2024 00:10

The glaring issue here is your posting history though. I see you've finally accepted you do indeed hold some gc views. Well done.

FrippEnos · 22/02/2024 00:07

AlphariusOmegron · 21/02/2024 23:40

Because it’s not a 1:1 match of LGB to GC so they are not tied.

But there isn't a 1:1 match of LGB to T either so they shouldn't be tied.

RedToothBrush · 22/02/2024 00:05

AdamRyan · 21/02/2024 16:16

I don't think in this case anyone is "hiding behind the T"
Neither "sex matters" nor "transgender trend" are groups representing gay or bisexual people. They are groups representing GC women.

Kemi is either exaggerating or lying when she says "extensively engaged with LGBT groups", or she genuinely thinks GC women are part of LGBT. Neither of which are great.

If ever I saw evidence of someone proving they are a disengenous poster who comments in bad faith, saying this really proves it.

Can you explain a) how force teaming by TRAs by saying LGBT when they mean the T is ok b) how Stonewall represents the LGB in anyway when they redefined homosexuality to be along the lines of gender not sex when this is regarded as institutionally homophobic according to many prior and preexisting definitions (see wiki for more info).

And how it's much more important to demonstrate that Kemi Badenoch lied on a FOI request to be able to say 'Gotcha' to MN.

Bad faith isn't hard to spot but this post is a clear example which puts it in neon lights.

Oneofthesurvivors · 22/02/2024 00:03

I can't stand Badenoch and nothing would posses me to vote tory. My comment had nothing to do with defending her.

AdamRyan · 22/02/2024 00:01

Runningwildish · 21/02/2024 23:15

Thanks for this , I always wondered where the term sealioning came from. It's such a good metaphor.

I don't think you can sealion your own thread Confused

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 22/02/2024 00:00

Oneofthesurvivors · 21/02/2024 23:19

If you think there are no lesbian or bi women in GC groups you clearly know fuck all about either feminist or lesbian history (or the weaving and intertwining between the two)

I don't think that. I don't think Badenoch should be using GC women as her main source about about gay peoples issues.
I'd be pretty fucked off of my work decided they were going to only speak to the male head pf inclusion, because he talks to lots of feminists.

I was pretty fucked off when Maria Miller didn't talk to any women when she was doing her transgender equality consultation. Maybe I shouldn't have been. After all, she is a woman. What more representation do I need?

I cannot believe the lengths you are all going to, to protect your image of Badenoch. She's dropped a clanger here and it says a lot about her. To me it shows how she thinks she knows best, no need to consult anyone else.

OP posts:
Fruityful · 21/02/2024 23:52

I don't even count lesbians as LGBT. LGBT is a political movement and social clique and whilst I sympathise with people who still think it's about them I don't believe it to be so. And frankly Lesbians and Gay men were always queer bedfellows without much in common beyond a temporary alliance of convenience (which arguably may have done more harm than good as despite the superficiality of terminology don't really have that much in common).

Frankly the current LGBT term and movement is more of a hindrance to gay and lesbian acceptance than it is a flag to rally around.

AlphariusOmegron · 21/02/2024 23:40

FrippEnos · 21/02/2024 23:23

Why wouldn't the LGB have anything to do with being GC?
The T group seem to think that the L should want to sleep with men and the T want to turn a sexual orientation into a genital preference.

Because it’s not a 1:1 match of LGB to GC so they are not tied.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 21/02/2024 23:32

Oneofthesurvivors · 21/02/2024 23:19

If you think there are no lesbian or bi women in GC groups you clearly know fuck all about either feminist or lesbian history (or the weaving and intertwining between the two)

The OP's words were:
".. I'm complaining she's tried to shoehorn GC feminists into LGB because I'm fed up with the "feminists are all lesbians" trope".

Make of that what you will. 😑

FrippEnos · 21/02/2024 23:23

AlphariusOmegron · 21/02/2024 16:35

LGB doesn't have anything to do with TQI and neither have anything to do with GC to be honest :)

Why wouldn't the LGB have anything to do with being GC?
The T group seem to think that the L should want to sleep with men and the T want to turn a sexual orientation into a genital preference.

Oneofthesurvivors · 21/02/2024 23:19

If you think there are no lesbian or bi women in GC groups you clearly know fuck all about either feminist or lesbian history (or the weaving and intertwining between the two)

Runningwildish · 21/02/2024 23:15

Froodwithatowel · 21/02/2024 16:22

Mm.

Thanks for this , I always wondered where the term sealioning came from. It's such a good metaphor.

AdamRyan · 21/02/2024 23:09

Datun · 21/02/2024 22:02

Frankly, I think it would be excellent.

But you know what, you can always write to your MP.

There is very little point writing to my MP. He's a true blue Tory who was in trouble many moons ago for taking an uncleared aide to Top Secret meetings and having to resign over it. He also think sex offenders should be anonymous until convicted, which is quite some safeguarding risk. So I doubt anything I have to say will register with him.

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 21/02/2024 23:07

JanesLittleGirl · 21/02/2024 22:01

@AdamRyan

I think its a pretty fucking big deal she said something untrue in a debate. And I think its a pretty fucking big deal she's not consulting wider as minister of women and Equalities.

Please don't beat about the bush. What you actually mean is "the Tories are bad people and you must not vote for them."

You may believe in women's rights and you may be gender critical but those views are secondary to your anti-Tory agenda.

Nice of you to presume you know what I think.
I am not "anti-Tory". I don't like the Conservatives since Johnson because they have undermined democracy. Kemi misleading the house is just another example of that.

Hence why I said what you quoted. It is a big deal to me. It would be a big deal if any government was doing it.

OP posts:
ScrollingLeaves · 21/02/2024 23:00

I forgot to say these groups represent gay interests without being captured by the T.

ScrollingLeaves · 21/02/2024 22:58

AdamRyan · Today 19:48

“If Badenoch had met any gay campaign groups (not trans ones) she would have said. It would have shown.
She didn't. And in fact seems to be taking a particular line like this board, which is there are no groups representing gay interests and they are all captured by the T.
”

Everyone on this board knows about the LGB alliance and some will know if the Gay Men’s Network ( who has a brilliant and eloquent spokesman). Then there are psychologists who know the links between gender dysphoria and being gay/ or homophobic attitudes to gender non-conforming children. These groups represent gay interests.

ScrollingLeaves · 21/02/2024 22:48

AdamRyan · 21/02/2024 14:36

https://twitter.com/BenPBradshaw/status/1760307343126929467?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Here's his question in parliament today. I don't agree with his characterisation of the two groups, but its weird she gave those two as the answer to the question

She said she had ‘engaged’ with them, not met them, which could be true.

They may have been gay people or trans people. The term LGBT is not clear.

What is unlikely to be true is that she met with two ‘anti trans’ groups rather than with two groups seeking to protect women and children’s rights and well being.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 21/02/2024 22:48

Datun · 21/02/2024 21:41

I can't speak for anyone else, because I'm not taking a line.

I was under the impression you felt she hadn't consulted trans people. I'm not on Twitter so can only see what you've posted.

So now I think you're saying she hasn't consulted LGB groups, only gender critical women.

Well they're not mutually exclusive, obviously. In fact there's a massive overlap.

But maybe she'll publish a list about how many trans groups the government have historically been listening to, how many LGB groups they've historically been listening to, and how many gender critical women they've historically been listening to.

I'd be more than happy if she adds them all up, and redresses any balance.

You're a genius Datun! Flowers
Just imagine if she (or anyone in government) adds up the total for all the conferences, the meetings, the diversity champions schemes, the allies, the funded resources, the civil service time devoted to lobby groups, the bloody flags and redresses the balance to include women 😱

Sex matters, TT, FPFW, WPUK, SSA & others will get government funding to the tune of millions of £££ with over a decade worth of meetings, awards, peerages, flags, days of remembrance, lanyards and all the rest. And nobody will be able to moan about a couple of meetings as they'll practically live alongside the government. Women can put our purses away as we finally get a share of the attentions and power that's been given to all the queer theory groups.

Datun · 21/02/2024 22:02

Frankly, I think it would be excellent.

But you know what, you can always write to your MP.

JanesLittleGirl · 21/02/2024 22:01

@AdamRyan

I think its a pretty fucking big deal she said something untrue in a debate. And I think its a pretty fucking big deal she's not consulting wider as minister of women and Equalities.

Please don't beat about the bush. What you actually mean is "the Tories are bad people and you must not vote for them."

You may believe in women's rights and you may be gender critical but those views are secondary to your anti-Tory agenda.

Swipe left for the next trending thread