Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Helleofabore · 19/02/2024 15:14

RethinkingLife · 19/02/2024 13:51

It's this study. You'll recognise Prof Kaltiala's name from the upcoming conference.

Ruuska S, Tuisku K, Holttinen T, et alAll-cause and suicide mortalities among adolescents and young adults who contacted specialised gender identity services in Finland in 1996–2019: a register studyBMJ Ment Health 2024;27:e300940.

https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/27/1/e300940.full

https://can-sg.org/can-sg-conference/

Quick scamper, more later, indicates a robust cohort study with a thoughtfully selected comparator group for the analysis.

Four male and four female controls matched for age and municipality of birth were extracted from the Population Information System for each gender-referred individual. The gender-referred individual’s index date was assigned to all controls. [My emphasis.]

Sensible variables and corrections. E.g., the number of "psychiatric treatment contacts" for the referred young people and those in the comparator.

When only registered sex and year of birth were controlled for, the HR for suicide mortality greatly increased in the gender-referred group. However, when the number of specialist-level psychiatric treatment contacts was added to the model, the difference between cases and controls levelled out. Death by suicide was significantly predicted by a high number of psychiatric treatment contacts, and borderline significantly predicted by male sex and earlier birth year.

More later but it's looking methodologically sound.

Thank you rethinking!!

ArrestHer · 19/02/2024 14:31

I love mumsnet. Thanks @RethinkingLife

RethinkingLife · 19/02/2024 13:51

It's this study. You'll recognise Prof Kaltiala's name from the upcoming conference.

Ruuska S, Tuisku K, Holttinen T, et alAll-cause and suicide mortalities among adolescents and young adults who contacted specialised gender identity services in Finland in 1996–2019: a register studyBMJ Ment Health 2024;27:e300940.

https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/27/1/e300940.full

https://can-sg.org/can-sg-conference/

Quick scamper, more later, indicates a robust cohort study with a thoughtfully selected comparator group for the analysis.

Four male and four female controls matched for age and municipality of birth were extracted from the Population Information System for each gender-referred individual. The gender-referred individual’s index date was assigned to all controls. [My emphasis.]

Sensible variables and corrections. E.g., the number of "psychiatric treatment contacts" for the referred young people and those in the comparator.

When only registered sex and year of birth were controlled for, the HR for suicide mortality greatly increased in the gender-referred group. However, when the number of specialist-level psychiatric treatment contacts was added to the model, the difference between cases and controls levelled out. Death by suicide was significantly predicted by a high number of psychiatric treatment contacts, and borderline significantly predicted by male sex and earlier birth year.

More later but it's looking methodologically sound.

https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/27/1/e300940.full

ArrestHer · 19/02/2024 13:01

I’d really like one of our resident scientists in the know about studies to read the original study paperwork and analyse these results.

Not because I doubt them, but because we apply that rigour to anything posted by the TRAs and I’d love to see a post about how well built this study is and how all the variables have been well considered and accounted for!