Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Parkrun to remove course records

188 replies

Ingenieur · 07/02/2024 18:39

In response to criticism of its "gender categorisation policies", Parkrun are now removing a suite of details and records from the site.

https://twitter.com/Cantspekl/status/1755170910787490028

One more thing taken away...

https://twitter.com/Cantspekl/status/1755170910787490028

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
CarrotSoupwithCheese · 11/02/2024 07:41

Very interesting watching this blow up on social media and running groups. I’m really hoping the backlash makes parkrun HQ reconsider just how important those stats (and fairness) are to people, even to people who will never beat them!

I am secretly glad that they’ve they pissed off the men who care about stats too.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 10/02/2024 21:42

I haven't read the rest of this thread but the only way this can be resolved is for all participants to be honest when they self-declare their age and sex. parkrun doesn't and realistically can't check, so there has to be a return to a consensus that for sport sex is what matters, not gender, and anybody deliberately misstating their sex is cheating, just as they would be if they misstated their age. They should ask for sex, not gender, when people register, and only offer the options M, F or Prefer not to to say. Anybody in that latter category gets excluded from the M and F results. All of which will only work if the vast, vast majority of the population find their spines and start saying out loud that transwomen have no place in women's sport, at any level.

mcduffy · 10/02/2024 21:14

Just seen this posted on a running group I'm in

https://www.change.org/p/reinstate-statistics-on-parkrun-for-all-participants

WomaninBoots · 10/02/2024 19:39

lieselotte · 10/02/2024 18:24

You can see it in any individual results list. I was 5th lady at my local event last week, but about 50th overall.

As for Sophie Raworth, she's just not human with her speed!

Yes, but what I mean is that you lose the overall picture. My parkrun is a smaller one and it's not so obvious on some days. I think one week we we're on a 1:1 ratio male to female for the first 20 finishers. Obviously that's not the norm and of course you can usually see it but the power of the larger data set collated over time is lost.

I'm annoyed that they've hidden the age catagory lists in particular, they were clearly going to keep them but the clickable link on age categories is now gone too.

lieselotte · 10/02/2024 19:30

I think the only person who can reasonably ask (not tell) the photographer to delete the photos of Mara is Mara herself.

The park is a public space.

Norma27 · 10/02/2024 18:47

I was at cannon hill last week and I’m the person who took the photo of the photographer taking a picture of Mara.
pictures of 1st male finisher. None of 1st female because it was Mara wearing a Save Womens Sports top.
Photographer admitted he was told to delete photos.

lieselotte · 10/02/2024 18:24

WomaninBoots · 10/02/2024 14:15

Another thought.

By removing the records lists, parkrun also remove evidence that men are faster than women. Which is convenient. The female record at my local was around 4 or 5 minutes slower than the male record. I can't check this anymore though, of course. I also can't go and re-count exactly how many women were in the "fastest 100"... I think it was about 7.

You can see it in any individual results list. I was 5th lady at my local event last week, but about 50th overall.

As for Sophie Raworth, she's just not human with her speed!

IcakethereforeIam · 10/02/2024 15:32

Another article in the Telegraph's opinion section

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/10/parkrun-erase-women-than-admit-that-biology-rules/

https://archive.ph/R2yxv link avoiding paywall

I know this is a rhetorical question but I'd dearly love one of the organisations (Parkrun, M&S, the Body Shop, etc.) who are guilty of it to provide an honest and sensible answer

Why do organisations constantly seek to pander to a tiny minority rather than accommodating the majority who keep them afloat?

Parkrun would rather erase women than admit that biology rules

Why do organisations constantly seek to pander to a tiny minority rather than accommodating the majority who keep them afloat?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/10/parkrun-erase-women-than-admit-that-biology-rules

DuesToTheDirt · 10/02/2024 15:21

WomaninBoots · 10/02/2024 14:15

Another thought.

By removing the records lists, parkrun also remove evidence that men are faster than women. Which is convenient. The female record at my local was around 4 or 5 minutes slower than the male record. I can't check this anymore though, of course. I also can't go and re-count exactly how many women were in the "fastest 100"... I think it was about 7.

Of course, you only have to turn up at a park run and see who crosses the finish line first. One week I did a rough visual estimate - the first 20-30 finishers were all male. In the next 20 or so there were only a couple of women. About 2/3 of the field were men, 1/3 women (I took that part from the web results, rather than counting 300 people!).

WookeyHole · 10/02/2024 14:30

The comments in response to this are worth a read. She's putting a lot of people off with her speed Wink

Parkrun to remove course records
WomaninBoots · 10/02/2024 14:15

Another thought.

By removing the records lists, parkrun also remove evidence that men are faster than women. Which is convenient. The female record at my local was around 4 or 5 minutes slower than the male record. I can't check this anymore though, of course. I also can't go and re-count exactly how many women were in the "fastest 100"... I think it was about 7.

Cloudyz7 · 10/02/2024 12:07

lieselotte · 09/02/2024 21:27

I've seen a good point made this evening which I hadn't thought about - many early events (and indeed my home parkrun) were set up with the help of, and funding from, local running clubs.

Yet they seem happy to tell "runners" to go away.

It does seem bizarre that Parkrun now positions itself as anti-race, anti-competitive and anti-running.

I suppose all good things come to an end.

lieselotte · 09/02/2024 21:27

I've seen a good point made this evening which I hadn't thought about - many early events (and indeed my home parkrun) were set up with the help of, and funding from, local running clubs.

Yet they seem happy to tell "runners" to go away.

ArdentFeminist · 09/02/2024 21:02

Seen earlier, sums it up well!

Parkrun to remove course records
ArdentFeminist · 09/02/2024 20:58

Does anyone have a link to parkruns policy on political statements, protests etc? Because, yes, there are potential many t-shirts that qualify as political statements.

ArdentFeminist · 09/02/2024 20:57

This is the tweet with the pic of the fb comment by the photographer https://x.com/marayamauchi/status/1754432964958568489?s=20

https://x.com/mara_yamauchi/status/1754432964958568489?s=20

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 09/02/2024 20:56

LonginesPrime · 09/02/2024 12:49

I think Parkrun's decision is probably a good thing in terms of getting to the crux of the issue.

Initially, the two main arguments available to them in saying that males are female were (1) sex doesn't matter in running and (2) competition doesn't matter.

If they had gone with the first option and deleted their 'gender' categories, only women would have been disadvantaged and men wouldn't have cared as their times wouldn't have been affected. (Obviously, this option would have been a harder sell anyway, given the general direction professional sport is moving in).

But by doubling down on their argument that competition and stats don't matter at all (and essentially implying that grassroots and amateur sport doesn't matter) they have managed to shit on everyone equally and undermine much of the appeal of Parkrun for many of its supporters.

If they end up reinstating the competitive element, they will have to concede that it's unfair to women to not have their own category based on biology, since it can't be the case that only men should get the competitive element back but not women.

It is wonderfully satisfying to see Parkrun hoist by their own petard, by doubling down on the "It's not a competition" argument, when what they really meant is that "Only male competitors (of all gender identities) matter".

WomaninBoots · 09/02/2024 20:56

Oh my! What a tirade of abuse that was! 🤣

Apparently parkrun policy is to not promote political causes which is why they deleted the photos of the women... I hope no parkrun has ever published a photo of someone wearing a pride flag on any kind then.

And I'd question whether a protest over parkrun policy is "political" anyway.

ArdentFeminist · 09/02/2024 20:45

@WomaninBoots iirc there was some back and forth earlier in the week over Mara’s Parkrun photo being deleted, including comments on the fb page from the photographer explaining he’d been asked to delete it.
You should be able to see the photos on the link to Mara’s tweet, and you can see people complaining about deleted photos underneath. We have receipts.
https://x.com/marayamauchi/status/1754437388338683999?s=20

https://x.com/mara_yamauchi/status/1754437388338683999?s=20

WomaninBoots · 09/02/2024 20:35

On that note... I saw someone talking about a "tirade of attacks" (by women campaigners) on FB and X on the core team at Cannon Hill parkrun. I found only a handful on deleted posts on their FB page when I went to look, so curious about what a "tirade of attacks" might look like I googled "Cannon Hil parkrun attacks" to see if any forum posts with examples of such or anything cropped up anywhere.

Unfortunately the first two hits were about a woman getting stabbed while running alone in said park. Which rather illustrates the points about barriers to sports participation for women made by a previous poster!

Leafbuds · 09/02/2024 20:34

It was on the BBC news last night (10 o'clock), and I was somewhat surprised

MidnightSerenader · 09/02/2024 20:26

WomaninBoots · 09/02/2024 13:56

Some men are getting doubly angry because not only have they had their stats taken away despite telling women that stats don't matter ad nauseum for so long... now, also, some of those inferior woman-humans are laughing at them. 😭

🎯

And, you know what they say…. men are afraid women will laugh at them. Women are afraid men will kill them.

RethinkingLife · 09/02/2024 20:12

afternoonoflife · 09/02/2024 19:55

Now it affects men a BBC presenter is suddenly interested in the Parkrun situation 🙄
https://twitter.com/sharrond62/status/1755684355286962258

Sophie Raworth no less. I wonder if she might speculate on why there might be a dearth of women record holders who can speak up?

Unless, of course, Sophie is interested in women whose records were erased before this action, and for a different reason?

afternoonoflife · 09/02/2024 19:55

Now it affects men a BBC presenter is suddenly interested in the Parkrun situation 🙄
https://twitter.com/sharrond62/status/1755684355286962258

https://twitter.com/sharrond62/status/1755684355286962258

WomaninBoots · 09/02/2024 19:50

"Calm down dears" says parkrun HQ. It just gets better and better this. 😆

Swipe left for the next trending thread