Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Let's have a poll!

403 replies

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 08:27

Thought it would be interesting to see the majority view on this board for what the consensus is on how trans people should be accommodated in society. I want to see what less vocal posters think Smile

Options:

  1. as they identify. Exactly the same as the sex they identify with. Access to womens spaces at all times, protected in law.
  2. Third spaces: Treated as their acquired sex in most social and work contexts, use third spaces or treated as birth sex for times where biology is important for safety or dignity (i.e. hospitals, prisons, sports, changing rooms, providing or receiving intimate services like waxing, smear tests)
  3. As their birth sex. People can choose to refer to them in their acquired gender but there is no expectation of this; all official documentation and interactions with services remains as birth sex.
  4. Other - please explain

Let's see!

OP posts:
pickledandpuzzled · 31/01/2024 14:59

Ah, sorry. Too late to ask 😂

pickledandpuzzled · 31/01/2024 14:58

What’s your partner’s position on using male spaces, where Muslim men could reasonably expect to be in a single sex place?

I have concerns about the bringing of ethnic minority needs to the discussion. I’m torn because I wouldn’t want women to be excluded from anywhere because trans women are using those spaces. Equally I am unhappy about religious restrictions on women mixing with men.

I support single sex spaces for safety and dignity, not for religious practice.

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 14:52

And actually the last few posts are exactly why I started the poll, because as soon as any poster deviates from the biological sex in all circumstances line, they get a grilling as if they are in charge, and I think that puts posters with different views off sharing them.
I just wanted to see how many posters share that view without putting posters in a position where they get a lot of questions.
To that end I'm not answering any more questions about my own views, I'm entitled to hold them and don't feel up to a bunfight today.

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 14:48

I don't see what value trying to answer your questions brings. We both have our own opinions, that's fine.
And I do mean trans people, but the debate around shared spaces is most relevant to women (so applie to trans women) as trans men don't cause the same risks in men's spaces. So I slipped up in the OP.

OP posts:
BackToLurk · 31/01/2024 14:46

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 14:38

I meant giving a smear, not receiving one Grin or providing waxing. I thought if I didn't give examples people would think I was euphemistically referring to prostitution

You said providing or receiving. Way to ignore the rest of the post though. Top work

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 14:38

BackToLurk · 31/01/2024 13:52

Third spaces: Treated as their acquired sex in most social and work contexts, use third spaces or treated as birth sex for times where biology is important for safety or dignity (i.e. hospitals, prisons, sports, changing rooms, providing or receiving intimate services like waxing, smear tests)

Maybe the fact that it is 'hard to write' should have given you pause for thought.

To bunch waxing & smear tests together as 'intimate services' is just plain weird. One is a medical screening process.

You still don't really explain what the 'most social and work contexts' are that require people to be treated differently on the basis of their sex. Do you mean toilets in an office building for example? If so do you change your mind if Muslim men & women use those single-sex facilities to wash before praying? Or do you mean that if a man wants to wear a skirt as part of a uniform they should be able to? And let's face it, despite saying 'trans people' you mean transwomen.

Edited

I meant giving a smear, not receiving one Grin or providing waxing. I thought if I didn't give examples people would think I was euphemistically referring to prostitution

OP posts:
WickedSerious · 31/01/2024 14:31

ImissTonyBlair · 31/01/2024 13:50

Well if someone genuinely believes they are the opposite sex, then I think they should be treated with psychotherapy to address their mental health problem, in the same way we treat people who believe they are aliens or Napolean or a secret royal etc etc.

It makes more sense that chopping off their bits and pretending to play along with their nonsense.

OldCrone · 31/01/2024 14:17

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:46

Men and women are always treated differently at work. Part of the reason I'm a feminist!
I mean using pronouns and new names, supporting them to attend events for their acquired sex, generally creating an inclusive atmosphere for trans people wherever that doesn't cause a dignity or safety issue for women.
I don't think its controversial but lots of other posters disagree, which is fine. Like I say, not interested in details really, just wanted to see the split of opinion.

I'm not disputing that men and women are often treated differently, both at work and elsewhere. My question was when do you think it might be appropriate to treat a man who wants to be a woman as though he actually is a woman?

What sort of events for their acquired sex are you thinking of? Support groups for women going through the menopause? A social group for lesbians? I can't think of any group for women in which it would be appropriate to include a man just because he claims to want to be a woman.

pickledandpuzzled · 31/01/2024 14:16

I’ve put other, but I may mean 3.

I want an end to discrimination based on gender. People can wear whatever they like but stick to sex based categories where they exist.

I don’t believe people can ‘acquire’ the other sex.

I do believe mean and women can present however they like.

I don’t believe special provision should be made for people who choose to present in an unusual way.

If Jill wants to wear a sharp suit and a crop, fine. If John wants to wear a dress, ok.

Neither John nor Jill need special treatment and both need to face the consequences of their choices, just as those with pink hair piercings and a tattoo do.

As time goes on the boundaries will shift, bankers will have facial piercings and creatives will have moved on to ‘valuing the integrity of their skin’ and be all pure and milky.

Fashion is just that.

Theyarehere · 31/01/2024 13:59

You wrote “I want to see what less vocal posters think” that’s a fact. It’s in your OP. My interpretation of that was that you didn’t want to hear from the more “vocal posters”. You have said that was not your intention. Why do you need more from me?

Curtainscoper · 31/01/2024 13:57

To engage with the q, some variant of 2 although I echo that a workplace shouldn’t be treating someone as a particular sex unless it is relevant. Not sure what OP has in mind, unless it’s trivial stuff like calling someone Mr or Ms.
Perhaps places with gendered uniforms, but then I think these are ridiculous if it goes beyond ensuring sensible fit for differently sexed bodies.
but 2 covers a vast array of scenarios, some I’d agree with and some disagree with.

theilltemperedclavecinist · 31/01/2024 13:54

Maaate · 31/01/2024 13:37

What do mixed sex toilets solve?

They solve the trans problem. And are useful for anyone who needs an opposite sex companion such as a child or person with disabilities. Unisex toilets are great. They just shouldn't have abolished the ladies at the same time.

BackToLurk · 31/01/2024 13:52

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:21

OK some people were asking about option 2. Really hard to write as there will be lots of disagreement.
I wanted to give an option between trans people must be treated identically to their identified sex, and biological reality trumps gender identity in all circumstances. The precise detail of what that means is less important because there are unclear boundaries and I didn't want to distract from the question.

Even split between 2 and 3 at the moment which is interesting

Third spaces: Treated as their acquired sex in most social and work contexts, use third spaces or treated as birth sex for times where biology is important for safety or dignity (i.e. hospitals, prisons, sports, changing rooms, providing or receiving intimate services like waxing, smear tests)

Maybe the fact that it is 'hard to write' should have given you pause for thought.

To bunch waxing & smear tests together as 'intimate services' is just plain weird. One is a medical screening process.

You still don't really explain what the 'most social and work contexts' are that require people to be treated differently on the basis of their sex. Do you mean toilets in an office building for example? If so do you change your mind if Muslim men & women use those single-sex facilities to wash before praying? Or do you mean that if a man wants to wear a skirt as part of a uniform they should be able to? And let's face it, despite saying 'trans people' you mean transwomen.

ImissTonyBlair · 31/01/2024 13:50

Well if someone genuinely believes they are the opposite sex, then I think they should be treated with psychotherapy to address their mental health problem, in the same way we treat people who believe they are aliens or Napolean or a secret royal etc etc.

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:49

And saying "the fact op has said..." followed by something I didn't say is a misrepresentation. How come you think you did that if it wasn't intentional?

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:48

Theyarehere · 31/01/2024 13:44

I’m not misrepresenting you. I am saying how I have read your comment. You have put a connotation on to my comment just as I have on yours. You want to see what less vocal members think. I have put the connotation on your post that you don’t want the vocal members to comment or participate in your poll.

Well let's clear that up - I absolutely do! I just wanted to know the balance of views.

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:47

Curtainscoper · 31/01/2024 13:44

Just have to point out that this is the internet 😂

Yeah IKR. Thought that was stupid when I wrote it! I'm not posting anywhere else on the Internet 😂

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:46

OldCrone · 31/01/2024 10:35

@AdamRyan
Can you answer this? I'm trying to think of what sort of social and work contexts you mean, where men and women are treated differently, but a man who wants to be a woman should be treated as a woman.

Can you give some examples?

Men and women are always treated differently at work. Part of the reason I'm a feminist!
I mean using pronouns and new names, supporting them to attend events for their acquired sex, generally creating an inclusive atmosphere for trans people wherever that doesn't cause a dignity or safety issue for women.
I don't think its controversial but lots of other posters disagree, which is fine. Like I say, not interested in details really, just wanted to see the split of opinion.

OP posts:
Theyarehere · 31/01/2024 13:44

I’m not misrepresenting you. I am saying how I have read your comment. You have put a connotation on to my comment just as I have on yours. You want to see what less vocal members think. I have put the connotation on your post that you don’t want the vocal members to comment or participate in your poll.

Curtainscoper · 31/01/2024 13:44

Just have to point out that this is the internet 😂

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:40

Theyarehere · 31/01/2024 10:13

Why has Mrs Overtons post been deleted? I believe she had every right to mention concern about this poll and the motivations behind it. The fact that the OP has said they don’t want the more vocal members of the board to be heard is telling…especially when one gets a deletion.

Saying "I want to hear what less vocal posters think" isn't saying I "don’t want the more vocal members of the board to be heard". I want to hear both, not one side. Odd you would misrepresent me.

I am working (on a lunch break) so any deletions are nothing to do with me because I haven't been reporting.

OP posts:
Maaate · 31/01/2024 13:37

WallaceinAnderland · 31/01/2024 11:16

I'm also concerned that disabled people will lose access to their spaces in this. Because, technically, the third space is for disabled people.

Fourth spaces then. Fourth spaces, mixed sex, for anyone. Single sex spaces kept separately.

What do mixed sex toilets solve?

LentilFaculties · 31/01/2024 13:24

I voted 3 even though I support 3rd spaces in many contexts but not to the detriment of disability access or female equality and safety.

Couldn't vote 2 because of what you said about work and social.

Firstly, often when people claim to treat trans people as their acquired sex they don't. They just mean they perform pronouns. In reality, men get pandered to and women overlooked. Same old.

Secondly I can't equate 3rd spaces with "treating the same at work". My opinion coloured by the fact I work with children and this would be a safeguarding issue AND the fact I've experienced maternity discrimination.

AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:21

OK some people were asking about option 2. Really hard to write as there will be lots of disagreement.
I wanted to give an option between trans people must be treated identically to their identified sex, and biological reality trumps gender identity in all circumstances. The precise detail of what that means is less important because there are unclear boundaries and I didn't want to distract from the question.

Even split between 2 and 3 at the moment which is interesting

OP posts:
AdamRyan · 31/01/2024 13:12

Just to answer some questions, I started the thread because I'm genuinely interested, I'd say option 3 is the "loudest" voice on here but I'm option 2 so wanted to know if I was in a minority and if so how much.

Didn't give my opinion at the outset because I couldn't be arsed with 5 million questions making me justify it, that's not the point at all.

I have no intention of putting this on the Internet.
Thanks to all who responded Smile

OP posts: