Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Brighton shows why you shouldn’t vote Labour - Julie Burchill (and a mention of IamSarah)

112 replies

IwantToRetire · 28/01/2024 01:36

The pleas of many local parents to rid our schools of pesty wokeness have fallen on deaf ears. Classrooms have become petri dishes for social experiments in defiance of parental wishes. Is it really possible that, a few years ago, one school in Brighton, labelled as ‘the coolest state secondary in town’, once had as many as 40 children who did not identify with their sex at birth with another 36 saying they were ‘gender fluid’? Or is this social contagion, as eating disorders are now often understood to be, among sad teenagers desperate to identify as something or anything, rather than feel lonely? Whatever it is, the council are hindering rather than helping these confused adolescents. Sometimes it seems as though there is an almost sadistic element to the way right-on teachers torment distraught parents. Isn’t it odd to send people who think diversely off for re-education, or re-‘training’?

And another thing, after boasting that ‘diversity is strength’, isn’t it odd to send people who think diversely off for re-education, or re-‘training’? This is what the Sainted Bella did after Councillor Alison Thomson retweeted posts supporting JK Rowling and the feminist Germaine Greer. Even though the culprit apologised unreservedly, Chairman Sankey frowned, ‘I have also taken the decision to remove Councillor Thomson from her lead role on city centre renewal while further investigation is carried out and subject to her completing training.’ Because nothing says not being qualified to work on renewing city centres like believing in women’s rights.

But not even the re-training of the hapless Thomson was enough for one Green councillor, Chloe Goldsmith. She asked how Labour would ‘meaningfully demonstrate’ to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, questioning/queer, asexual plus (LGBTIQA+) people that the party would stand up for them. This brought another avalanche of woo-woo affirmation from Labour, with the situation continuing ad infinitum.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/brighton-shows-why-you-shouldnt-vote-labour/

Brighton shows why you shouldn't vote Labour

I surely wasn’t the only Brighton citizen who breathed a sigh of relief when the Green council was turfed out by Labour last May.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/brighton-shows-why-you-shouldnt-vote-labour

OP posts:
Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:35

(That was in response to @EasternStandard)

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:35

To be honest I'm pretty disillusioned with them all.
I'm disappointed with the Guardian for their stance on GC, the sacking of brilliant women's rights journalists and the sacking of Steve Bell which was utterly shameful.
I find the Times distinctly OK. Their coverage of culture (which I have a particular interest in) is very poor.
The Telegraph doesn't align to my political views.

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:32

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:26

Rattle and refresh, Rufus!

I wish i rattled, i mainly wobble

EasternStandard · 28/01/2024 09:28

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:27

Google Rod Liddle.

Which press do you rate @Dinoland?

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:27

roarrfeckingroar · 28/01/2024 08:42

In what world is the Spectator a "hate rag"?!

Google Rod Liddle.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:26

Rattle and refresh, Rufus!

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:24

Apologies rayon

i see people have already said that!

should have refreshed 🤦🏻‍♂️

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:21

I can see some are getting quite rattled for getting called out on this

no one is getting rattled

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:16

Waitwhat23 · 28/01/2024 08:53

The discussion above has made me think of another poster a while ago who did the usual 'it never happens, you're all just embroiled in a culture war!!', was shown various examples of what was being discussed and then slunk away claiming 'well, I've never read about it in the Guardian'....

I'm never going to vote Tory and the political choices are different (if depressing) here in Scotland. But given the essentially two party situation in England (I'm guessing Wales has some additional parties) and the vows from many, many people that they would never under any circumstances vote Tory, all Labour has to do is be less shite on this particular issue to romp home on a massive victory.

But Labour won't. Adherence to an ideology is simply too important.

It's baffling.

It is baffling.

Where I am it's a stark choice between Tory and SNP.

lifeturnsonadime · 28/01/2024 09:15

My only hope is that Starmer, despite being the consummate fence sitter on this topic, does actually see the way the wind is blowing and will diplomatically quash it, without ever appearing to do anything much.

He's not going to sit up and listen whilst some women wave all this through because 'not as bad as the Tories'.

I can't understand women who do that. It's so tribal.

PriOn1 · 28/01/2024 09:12

I fear Labour are going to room home to a victory with their anti-women policies still largely intact. My only hope is that Starmer, despite being the consummate fence sitter on this topic, does actually see the way the wind is blowing and will diplomatically quash it, without ever appearing to do anything much.

I really can’t tell whether he’s properly useless (as he appears to be) or whether he will turn out to be much cannier than I am currently giving him credit for.

Either way, I don’t think I can bring myself to vote Conservative, Labour, SNP or Green, which doesn’t leave me with many options unless there’s an SDP or independent in my area.

lifeturnsonadime · 28/01/2024 09:05

Gosh this thread is boringly predictable.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Labour Party would just do the right thing by women and children on this issue? Then left leaning women wouldn't have to be scolded or be accused of being closet Tories, or bigots or whatever for simply pointing out what a disappointment the left is on this.

Waitwhat23 · 28/01/2024 08:53

The discussion above has made me think of another poster a while ago who did the usual 'it never happens, you're all just embroiled in a culture war!!', was shown various examples of what was being discussed and then slunk away claiming 'well, I've never read about it in the Guardian'....

I'm never going to vote Tory and the political choices are different (if depressing) here in Scotland. But given the essentially two party situation in England (I'm guessing Wales has some additional parties) and the vows from many, many people that they would never under any circumstances vote Tory, all Labour has to do is be less shite on this particular issue to romp home on a massive victory.

But Labour won't. Adherence to an ideology is simply too important.

It's baffling.

AndThatWasNY · 28/01/2024 08:50

SidewaysOtter · 28/01/2024 08:31

They've had 13 years to sort this out. Why aren't they doing it now?

Labour have had 13 years to understand the issues that gender ideology causes women and come up with policies that protect us. Why aren’t they doing it now?

Absolutely I agree they should. But don't tell me the Tories actually care about this. Or women's rights at all. They have the power to do this but haven't. Why on earth not? The party backs in their supports back it? What's stopping them other than a weak attempt at maintaining power? They have nothing left to offer as they've ruined our country and therefore are resorting to populist views to scrabble for votes.

roarrfeckingroar · 28/01/2024 08:42

In what world is the Spectator a "hate rag"?!

AuContraire · 28/01/2024 08:39

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 07:34

I don't understand how you can turn a blind eye to the other articles published in the spectator just because they also back a cause you back. I don't think I could ever read the Spectator as it happily publishes Rod Liddle articles.
I don't think I'll ever forgive the Tories as most of them voted against equal marriage. What about austerity, the destruction of public services and the NHS, the pressure on teachers etc etc.
Maybe I'm being to black and white but I'll fight the GC fight without siding with the right thank you very much.

How can you turn a blind eye to some of the articles the Guardian has published? Justifying the sex attacks on women in Cologne on NYE, being but one example?

Maybe, just maybe, each newspaper has some right fucking idiots with abhorrent views working for them, as well as others who sometimes make points that you agree with?

donquixotedelamancha · 28/01/2024 08:38

Genderism isn't tied to left or right. It is it's own belief system and its adherents are trying to influence every party.

Yes the majority of Tory MPs are opposed now but that's because many have their own views about women that are just as unpleasant. They didn't give a shit when it was party policy.

If I lived in Brighton voting Tory might be my only option but nationally Labour are the least worst choice. Another Tory government will be disastrous for all.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 08:36

EasternStandard · 28/01/2024 08:32

If you think Labour is the answer you’re going to have to post more on why rather than scold posters for not feeling the same way about them

Women on here get this kind of stuff from posters often. No one is campaigning. We are discussing the issues. Maybe join in without the accusations

I often wonder if posters who pop up to scold us are actually clever fifth columnists. Because surely nobody actually thinks insulting and berating people will convince them to vote for who you want them to vote for?

readingmakesmehappy · 28/01/2024 08:36

James Kirkup's extremely thoughtful, well written and carefully researched pieces for the Spectator were some of the very first to expose the implications of the trans lobby's demands for women's rights and the assault on gender critical women.

Theinnocenteyeballsinthesky · 28/01/2024 08:33

@CreateHope seems to me quite obvious that no political party gives a fuck about women. Not a single bloody one of them.

we’re not stupid in here - we know full well that the Tories are only supporting a broadly CG stance because they see it as politically expedient. If they didn’t we’d be under the bus tomorrow. Labour, Lib Dem’s, SNP & greens care so little about women that they’re happy for men to not only announce they are one but then to privilege those men over actual women

frankly they can all fuck off

EasternStandard · 28/01/2024 08:33

SidewaysOtter · 28/01/2024 08:28

Who is saying the Tories are GC saviours? Read any of the many threads on the subject here, there’s lots of people saying they’ll “hold their nose” and vote Tory or similar. Hardly announcing the Tories as saviours. But they DO know what a woman is and Labour do not. Why are you blaming women - and making insinuations that a “grassroots” movement could only possibly be acting the way is is because it’s been hijacked, rather than sentient women freely CHOOSING to act as they do - rather than blaming Labour for not being good enough?

Maybe “three people are shouting” because we feel you’re wrong and - like many of our Resident Scolders - bloody irritating and dismissive.

like many of our Resident Scolders - bloody irritating and dismissive.

Yes take it down a notch

AlisonDonut · 28/01/2024 08:32

RayonSunrise · 28/01/2024 08:15

I agree on the reading a wide range of spices point MissLucy, but the article in question is about not voting Labour because if you do your constituency will turn into Brighton. This has been immediately turned into a not-so-subtle Vote Tory opportunity.

Honestly, I've been on MN for nearly 20 years and ever since Brexit the political campaigning here has become absolutely fevered. The feminist board used to be a rare exception, but at the moment you can't move for someone trying to turn our righteous anger at genderism's capture of parties and institutions into a vote for Their Side.

Most people on here do seem to be politically homeless ex lefties.

Absolutely aghast that the left has fallen for this.

They aren't all 'Tories' in the slightest.

EasternStandard · 28/01/2024 08:32

RayonSunrise · 28/01/2024 08:30

This has was identified as a possible campaigning issue a good few years ago now - hard to believe this originally started being discussed here 10 years ago now, back during the Spartacus days when the board was more about our shock and anger at how EVERYONE had let us down.

Sadly I no longer find it at all unbelievable that there would be people on MN for years campaigning for political parties. And yes, of course there will be people who will be swayed by them - I am not longer that surprised when I see lazy "x party will do right by women" talking points repeated here, but it still irritates me.

If you think Labour is the answer you’re going to have to post more on why rather than scold posters for not feeling the same way about them

Women on here get this kind of stuff from posters often. No one is campaigning. We are discussing the issues. Maybe join in without the accusations

SidewaysOtter · 28/01/2024 08:31

They've had 13 years to sort this out. Why aren't they doing it now?

Labour have had 13 years to understand the issues that gender ideology causes women and come up with policies that protect us. Why aren’t they doing it now?

RayonSunrise · 28/01/2024 08:30

This has was identified as a possible campaigning issue a good few years ago now - hard to believe this originally started being discussed here 10 years ago now, back during the Spartacus days when the board was more about our shock and anger at how EVERYONE had let us down.

Sadly I no longer find it at all unbelievable that there would be people on MN for years campaigning for political parties. And yes, of course there will be people who will be swayed by them - I am not longer that surprised when I see lazy "x party will do right by women" talking points repeated here, but it still irritates me.