Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
12
ArabellaScott · 26/01/2024 12:21

Holy mo.

aname1234 · 26/01/2024 12:17

lifeturnsonadime · 26/01/2024 12:00

Wow the tide IS turning!

Well done to the Guardian for publishing.

I bet a certain young man by the name of Owen is quietly seething somewhere!

Perhaps he should quit and work for Pink News 🤔

Lottapianos · 26/01/2024 12:17

It's a great piece, and so brilliant to see it in the Guardian

Crankywiddershins · 26/01/2024 12:12

Blimey OReilly! Happy weekend everyone!

Flimpychunk · 26/01/2024 12:08

Susanna Rustin has always championed women's rights but an amazing sign of the times that it's been published in the Guardian and not the Observer!

TipulophobiaIsReal · 26/01/2024 12:05
Shock

ShockShockShock

My god.

It was… factual. Rational. Fair. Ever-so-slightly, plausibly-deniably snarky in places. ('But a statement made by Social Work England shows how partisan that organisation’s position was. It said that gender-critical people “are unlikely to accept that transgender people who have socially and/or medically transitioned from one sex to another, are as matter of fact, biology and reality members of their chosen sex”. Given its treatment of Meade, it seems clear that SWE believes people can indeed choose their sex – not only as a matter of legal registration, via the gender certification process introduced by the last Labour government, but as a matter of “fact, biology and reality” – even if they have undergone no medical treatment and their transition is a purely social one (clothes, name-change and so on). It is the core of gender-critical belief that this is not true.')

My gob is smacked.

lifeturnsonadime · 26/01/2024 12:00

Wow the tide IS turning!

Well done to the Guardian for publishing.

I bet a certain young man by the name of Owen is quietly seething somewhere!