Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Why are women so complacent re. trans nonsense?

411 replies

JazbayGrapes · 19/01/2024 18:29

I mean, outside GC or radfem circles, i have heard some of the most outrageous things, coming not from the loony left, but seeming well-meaning, semi-conservative women. Like "What is your problem? Can't you just #BeKind?"

  1. Re. sports: "A lesson in inclusion and acceptance for a girl is much more valuable than any trophy. Or maybe your daughter should train harder."

  2. Re. prisons: "That's easy - don't break the law and you'll have nothing to worry about."

  3. Re. homeless shelters: "Imagine being so ungrateful for a roof over your head that you would complaint about trans."

4)Re. public toilets/showers/changing rooms: "If you are such a prude to undress in front of male genitalia, them maybe you should stay home and never go to gyms or swimming pools or etc."

I'm a a loss...

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/01/2024 13:24
Grin
ArabellaScott · 20/01/2024 13:24

FFS that Eresh beat me to it again.

Bolleauxxxx · 20/01/2024 13:19

Does anyone remember the names of the guide leaders who tried to stand up to GGUK about this?

i wanted to post a link

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/01/2024 13:19

And is it ok for more naive, uninformed women to do the risk assessment for their "lovely" male friends on all our behalf?

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 20/01/2024 13:17

My OH would never hurt a woman so shall we let him into women's spaces? is it OK for men to self select as not a danger?

//

I too would be interested in the answer to this

Bolleauxxxx · 20/01/2024 13:17

It seems short sighted as an organisational standpoint

quote of the month.

NOW you see why I’m so fucking cross. #lashingsoflemonadesadface

literalviolence · 20/01/2024 13:16

We know that girls benefit from girls only spaces and that it is being male which tends to go hand in hand with behaviours that silence girls so there is no place for a male of any identity in a female organisation as fsr as I'm concerned. There should be some mixed sex options for those who want them but it's revolting for an organisation to pretend to be female only.

DodoPatrol · 20/01/2024 13:08

Yes, that's the problem with Girl guiding. Rather than acknowledging and dealing with the issue, they have gone for shooting the messenger and denying any difference between girls and transgirls. Chumps.

Lavender14 · 20/01/2024 13:06

DodoPatrol · 20/01/2024 12:53

When my daughter was a teen I knew most of her classmates and therefore knew what actual sex they were. DH didn't. So, I once or twice had to step in with 'DH, if P wants a sleepover with Sam, that's fine because he's female. But Emily is male, so no.'

How do you split the sexes safely if not by sex, Lavender?

I said in my original post that separate rooms would need to be provided to manage the risk appropriately and couldn't understand why that was insufficient for the other poster re: safeguarding. I was unclear from the other posters comments that gguk isn't providing this which seems strange because I don't know of another Youth organisation that wouldn't support separate bedrooms in this instance to protect all involved including young people who may use binders and need time without them for example. It seems short sighted as an organisational standpoint.

literalviolence · 20/01/2024 12:59

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/01/2024 12:47

as they are living their life as a female child

It's not possible for any male to live life as a female. Female is a word that is based on sex, not gender identity.

This. I live life as a female because I have a female body. So I have periods, have grown children in my body and am going through menopause. Males csnt do that. Everything else is stereotypes.

Bolleauxxxx · 20/01/2024 12:59

Thanks @Ereshkigalangcleg nailed it.

infact I’d be delighted if all of the children — of ANY gender identity could go on the kind of old fashioned guide camp I used to go on as a child. They were Proper famous five/swallows and Amazons lashings of lemonade type stuff. Bloody glorious.

heck I’d fundraise for that. I might even drag myself out of self imposed exile to help out.

just as long as males are kept separate from females as per alllll the safeguarding.

DodoPatrol · 20/01/2024 12:53

When my daughter was a teen I knew most of her classmates and therefore knew what actual sex they were. DH didn't. So, I once or twice had to step in with 'DH, if P wants a sleepover with Sam, that's fine because he's female. But Emily is male, so no.'

How do you split the sexes safely if not by sex, Lavender?

Bolleauxxxx · 20/01/2024 12:51

Your assumption that because a young person is trans that they must be in some way harmful to the girls in your group is very unfair

how very transphobic..

don’t you even care about those poor vulnerable trans girls who will be falsely accused by the (checks notes) horrible teenage girls they are forced to share a tent with.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/01/2024 12:50

i didn’t say it was taking trans kids away that was the issue. it is males in female spaces that gives me the safeguarding heebiejeebies.

im 110% for the trans boys joining. And the demibois. in fact, the entire gender constellation is welcome on my (alas now hypothetical) camp. Just not males.

Please note this post by @Bolleauxxxx @Lavender14

This isn't about "trans" - please stop misrepresenting the beliefs of other women who don't share your ideology.

DodoPatrol · 20/01/2024 12:48

Your assumption that because a young person is trans that they must be in some way harmful to the girls in your group is very unfair

Nope.

It's fair to the girls not to have to share with male teenagers.

It's unfair to the girls to call them transphobic for not sharing with male teenagers.

Bolleauxxxx · 20/01/2024 12:47

she did her own personal risk assessment and decided it was best to leave than to work with a trans female child?

nearly.

i did a personal RA and decided if GGUK expected me to ignore the decades of safeguarding they’d taught me (no males in intimate female spaces) then the world had gone mad and I CBA with an unpaid volunteer role that wasn’t worth that kind of hassle.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/01/2024 12:47

as they are living their life as a female child

It's not possible for any male to live life as a female. Female is a word that is based on sex, not gender identity.

Ofcourseshecan · 20/01/2024 12:44

Ofcourseshecan · 20/01/2024 12:40

They wouldn't be asking to use the service in the first place if they weren't [trans]

Of course not. Because no man or boy has ever taken advantage of lax rules or gleefully jumped through a loophole.

People have the right to be naive if they wish. But no adult has the right to inflict the harmful results of their naïveté on children!

CorvusPurpureus · 20/01/2024 12:44

Lavender14 · 20/01/2024 12:32

Of course i understand the issues with mixed sex dorms having worked in the sector for many years, but thank you for being patronising. The poster has said (unless I'm misunderstanding) that she left the organisation because she did her own personal risk assessment and decided it was best to leave than to work with a trans female child?? The only risk assessment i can think of where that might become a real issue is predominantly around residentials and spaces that are single sex only where children would be unsupervised etc which I've stated is easily managed by provision of a separate room which is what most trans children would want anyway. So to me, the decision to refuse to work with a trans female (or trans male child) is excluding them. They are applying to girl guiding because they are trans and as per the organisational stance fit the bill to be there as they are living their life as a female child. So refusing to work with them is because they are trans. They wouldn't be asking to use the service in the first place if they weren't.

I'm a teacher, Lavender14. I do residential trips.

There'll be no mixed sex dorms on my watch.

So I would refuse. & everyone would miss out.

If a male student doesn't want to share with other males for any reason, we can generally find a solution.

The female students are not the solution, & neither is lying to them or their parents.

Ask me to do that, & you'll have to find someone else to run the trip (& you won't...none of my colleagues are that daft either).

Fortunately, I'm overseas & the whole 'trans kids' social contagion never really took off here (& has now largely gone the way of bottle flipping...).

Kdtym10 · 20/01/2024 12:40

Because they think they benefit from making men feel more important or they’re so down trodden they think the only way to get ahead is to appease men. Usually they’re too intellectually lazy to think, they’re too frightened of independent thought and it’s repercussions they’re happy to accept the outright misogyny.

the same women who would have claimed women shouldn’t have the vote.

Ofcourseshecan · 20/01/2024 12:40

Lavender14 · 20/01/2024 12:32

Of course i understand the issues with mixed sex dorms having worked in the sector for many years, but thank you for being patronising. The poster has said (unless I'm misunderstanding) that she left the organisation because she did her own personal risk assessment and decided it was best to leave than to work with a trans female child?? The only risk assessment i can think of where that might become a real issue is predominantly around residentials and spaces that are single sex only where children would be unsupervised etc which I've stated is easily managed by provision of a separate room which is what most trans children would want anyway. So to me, the decision to refuse to work with a trans female (or trans male child) is excluding them. They are applying to girl guiding because they are trans and as per the organisational stance fit the bill to be there as they are living their life as a female child. So refusing to work with them is because they are trans. They wouldn't be asking to use the service in the first place if they weren't.

They wouldn't be asking to use the service in the first place if they weren't [trans]

Of course not. Because no man or boy has ever taken advantage of lax rules or gleefully jumped through a loophole.

Bolleauxxxx · 20/01/2024 12:39

Also, Just for clarity (and the lurkers)

i didn’t say it was taking trans kids away that was the issue. it is males in female spaces that gives me the safeguarding heebiejeebies.

im 110% for the trans boys joining. And the demibois. in fact, the entire gender constellation is welcome on my (alas now hypothetical) camp. Just not males.

not if I am explicitly not allowed to segregate appropriately as per standard safeguarding practice.

Wellies54 · 20/01/2024 12:36

@SallyWD Sorry, but safeguarding doesn't work on the principal that most people are nice so it'll probably be ok.