”and interacting with the soiled nappies in sight of the public”. (from the Yahoo article).
I don’t think anyone needs what they mean by “interacting” spelling out.
There’s something very wrong with a judicial system that is minded to pander to people accused of crimes like this. Particularly when it sounds like the man breached the conditions of his previous sentence (for something very similar in nature).
A man committed the crime. Charge (and address) him by his legal name. And for God’s sake, record the crime by his birth sex.