As I said in a previous post that you quoted and replied to, I hadn't read the thread, so no.
I have now read the thread. I was somewhat surprised to see that you haven't posted in it at all - why is that, I wonder?
One poster has said she can't take ZW seriously since she wrote columns about 'shagging her way around London' - that's not shaming her for her sex life, that's shaming her for making a column about it. I personally don't like columns like that myself, find them boring and immature. Most people have a sex life, a lot of people 'shag around' - so what? As others have said, if you're going to put writing out in the public domain, people are going to have an opinion about it.
One poster has said she hopes she suffers the consequences of her beliefs. There are A LOT of consequences of pushing a belief that men can be women, from women having to undress in front of men, to having to play sport against them, to missing out on awards, places on panels etc. Of course you would imply the most nefarious intentions.
As for people questioning her intelligence - is this your first day on the Internet? If someone writes something others deem stupid, they will say so!
SO surprised to see a TRA being disingenuous! Shocked, I tells ya!
So NO, I do not think ZW has been bullied, and NO I do not think she deserves an apology from Mumsnet and NO a few posts on a forum is NOT worse than what Milli Hill has been through - have you actually read her blog??
I won't be replying to you again, and I hope nobody else does either. Just wanted to address your disingenuous takes for the benefit of everyone reading.