Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Rachel Meade - it's a win!

692 replies

BreadInCaptivity · 09/01/2024 12:35

x.com/legalfeminist/status/1744697995822526961?s=46&t=88gZvdSnTk70X8b2ZUPZtA

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
Boiledbeetle · 09/01/2024 13:38

Wonderful news!

Back To School What GIF
Boomboom22 · 09/01/2024 13:30

Good, particularly about the regulator. It is these institutions that have led to gc women living I fear and having to be careful to not say the truth in case they get sacked for offending a man.

Very good comments about looking at who is complaining and the context, rather than assuming tw are God as it were.

IcakethereforeIam · 09/01/2024 13:29

Brilliant! Particularly liked this bit

“Context is important and merely accepting at face value a complainant’s subjective perception of offence is not the appropriate test, but rather that an objective evaluation should be undertaken.”

Who's Mr Woolton? I'm assuming the person who made the original complaint that started the whole shitshow.

Can they appeal? They were pretty much annihilated so, imo, they'd be mad to try.

Well done Rachel, I wish you all the best for this new year. I'm so glad you've won and been, comprehensively, vindicated but this must have been a dreadful experience. I'm so sorry you have been through this.

LadySylviaMcCordle · 09/01/2024 13:28

WorriedMutha · 09/01/2024 13:12

All the other pipeline cases are going to go down like nine pins. The Green Party coffers will be decimated. Its a good job it's not an election year eh.

Not before they've caused maximum stress and cost lots of money.

ArabellaScott · 09/01/2024 13:27

'Ms Meade’s solicitor, Shazia Khan, Founding Partner of Cole Khan Solicitors said:

“This is a landmark victory for common sense and free speech in the culture war on gender issues. The Tribunal found that my client was subjected to sustained and prolonged harassment by her employer Westminster City Council and her Regulator Social Work England for merely expressing her gender critical beliefs. This judgment sounds an alarm for all regulators — and all employers of regulated professionals — that they must not let their processes be weaponised by activists bent on silencing the debate on freedom of speech on gender. We demand apologies from Westminster City Council and Social Work England who have to date failed to acknowledge and accept their breaches of the Equality Act 2010 and the harrowing impact of their actions upon my client. We now call for urgent root and branch reform from the top down of both organisations to mitigate against further unlawful discrimination of employees and registrants”.'

(my bold)

Fantastic, Rachel and team. So very well done, and thank you.

ArabellaScott · 09/01/2024 13:25

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!

'This is a landmark decision. It is the first time a Regulator and an Employer have together been found to have been liable for discrimination relating to gender critical beliefs.'

OwlWeiwei · 09/01/2024 13:24

I hope a lot of law suits follow that will curb the tendency of bullies to enjoy silencing and humiliating GC women and trying to take away their livelihoods.

Cailin66 · 09/01/2024 13:24

What role did Woolton play in all of this?

ADoggyDogWorld · 09/01/2024 13:23

Wow a comprehensive spanking by the tribunal for both SWE and WCC.

Thank you for the updates and links, made my day. Cheers, wims.

Noshowlomo · 09/01/2024 13:21

Fantastic. Other councils take note!!

JusticeTrade · 09/01/2024 13:19

Another injustice against women defeated!!! Congratulations Rachel, thank you for fighting against bullies and silencers!
The fight goes on!!!!!

boxing day football GIF by Carabao UK
IDontWantToBeInAnyGangThatYoureIn · 09/01/2024 13:18

I'm sure Billy will be retweeting this very soon.

christmascactus22 · 09/01/2024 13:16

A very strongly worded judgement which should give HR departments throughout the UK pause for thought.

Signalbox · 09/01/2024 13:16

"This is a landmark decision. It is the first time a Regulator and an Employer have together been found to have been liable for discrimination relating to gender critical beliefs."

borntobequiet · 09/01/2024 13:16

Very good news. Well done Rachel and her team.

popebishop · 09/01/2024 13:15

Social Work England’s] failure to check if Mr Woolton’s complaint could be malicious, and not checking his previous social media history, is indicative of a lack of rigour in the investigation, and an apparent willingness to accept a complaint from one side of the gender self-identification/gender critical debate without appropriate objective balance of the potential validity of different views in what is a highly polarised debate.”

I, for one, am shocked and stunned that this happened yet again

WorriedMutha · 09/01/2024 13:12

All the other pipeline cases are going to go down like nine pins. The Green Party coffers will be decimated. Its a good job it's not an election year eh.

Cosmosforbreakfast · 09/01/2024 13:12

Congratulations Rachel what a win and what a woman! You see this Bragg, Butler?!

ArchetypalBusyMum · 09/01/2024 13:12

Her garden still needs watering so I've sprinkled some there.
Gratitude for Rachel. 🙏

Signalbox · 09/01/2024 13:10

Brilliant. Well done Rachel!

2Rebecca · 09/01/2024 13:09

Excellent news. This has implications for other people TRAs try to get fired for expressing GC beliefs on social media.

popebishop · 09/01/2024 13:09

BreadInCaptivity · 09/01/2024 12:36

Wow, that's quite the list of discriminatory actions.

ifIwerenotanandroid · 09/01/2024 13:06

Congratulations Rachel & team!

Igmum · 09/01/2024 13:03

Excellent news! Fingers crossed she gets decent compensation and no appeal. I'd like every other government body and professional organisation to learn from this