UN investigates UK human rights body after ‘smear’ on chairwoman

This is just part of the power play by TRAs men.

Its never about TM is it. Always about the men who don’t like being told no.

UNWOMEN
UnWomen
Unwomen.

Says it all, really.

Ah the UN. virus? Virus? What virus? Ah eh there's definitely no independent way of verifying the source.
Ukraine was invaded? Must be a local dispute.
They raped who? Are you sure?

The uk said the man is not a woman. Finally, a bad egg!

Farcical.

Ah, a circus performer on an upturned tub, clapping and flapping, catching a ball and going, "Arp! Arp! Arp!"

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/24/equalities-watchdog-ends-investigation-into-complaints-about-chairwoman-kishwer-falkner

Behold wims. A man hath arrived! With jobs for us to do.

Look harder then

I can't find any evidence that she was cleared or received an apology, merely that Badenoch suspended the investigation. Does anyone have a link suggesting otherwise?

From the Telegraph link:

Any decision to remove the EHRC’s so-called “A-status” would <a class="break-all" href="https://archive.ph/o/3pVc6/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/27/britain-faces-un-blacklist-over-trans-rights-lobby-ehrc/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">see Britain lose its place at the table of the UN Human Rights Council and a number of UN bodies.

Yes, and the Committee has such exalted defenders of human rights:

https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/membership

Algeria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Newcastle United Saudi Arabia, Guatemala, Albania, Hungary...

It's as if they have no credibility as it stands.

”Both seem to indicate that those running the show nationally / globally either have no critical thinking skills at all, or have out-sourced all thinking, presumably to unelected special interest groups / global corporations.”

My concern was that people tend to judge others based on what they themselves do and how they act. Which indicates those at the top are both lazy and unethical and therefore assume those lower down the pecking order are like them. Pretty much fits with the evidence emerging about the recent behaviour of the Conservative government.

Women are getting it from all angles atm

Males supported by institutions and many

Women speaking up need to be take out - modern day McCarthyism

It's a huge blind spot though, isn't it - not to be able to see that, in terms of the sheer numbers, the vast majority of discrimination, disadvantage and violence in the world is being inflicted on people with a single protected characteristic. You know the ones I mean. We Who Must Not Be Named.

The root of it will be that it's bloody inconvenient to men's sexual freedoms.

There'll be a fuckton of wangling and burble first, but that's what it will all boil down to.

So Madrigal-Borloz thinks that sex shouldn't be a protected characteristic? How does he justify that?

It's the seeming inability to even consider an alternative hypothesis that worries me. It's confirmation bias on steroids.

I believe they assumed that SPMs had always been skimming, and the introduction of Horizon enabled them to be caught.

Just like the colossal rise in GD referrals means trans kids always existed but were previously suppressed by societal expectations.

This is ridiculous and doesn't refect well on Ganhri. They seem to be placing a lot of emphasis on the report of Victor Madrigal-Borloz......

The SCA also notes the concerns expressed by the UN Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (IE- SOGI) in his end of
mission statement following his country visit to the United Kingdom in April-May 2023.
Following a meeting with the EHRC in May 2023, the Independent Expert expressed the opinion that the action of the EHRC, through its advice on the definition of ‘sex’ under the Equality Act, is “wholly unbecoming of an institution created to ‘stand up for those in need of protection and hold governments to account for their human rights obligations’”.

The SCA is of the view that third party submissions and publicly available information raise serious concerns about the continued compliance of the EHRC with the Paris Principles, including its ability to conduct its mandate independently, to take positions in line with international standards, and its cooperation with civil society.

In view of the information before it, the SCA decides to initiate a Special Review in accordance with
Article 16.2 of the GANHRI Statute in order to determine the EHRC’s ongoing compliance with the Paris Principles.

This might sound a bit left field, but what you said chimed with something I read earlier about the Post Office scandal along the lines of why did nobody consider it strange that hundreds of formerly upright and hard-working postmasters had suddenly turned into criminals.
Both seem to indicate that those running the show nationally / globally either have no critical thinking skills at all, or have out-sourced all thinking, presumably to unelected special interest groups / global corporations. Neither of these possibilities fill me with hope for the future...

I'm at the stage I couldn't care less.
The UK are the thorn in the side of the extremists. They are throwing everything at us for the UK govt to fold and also there are clear indications that the UN are deliberately provoking UK women.

Will it really be a bad thing? As a women living in the UK I don't give a shit if a UN man is upset that I can have access to spaces that exclude all males as per the Equality Act. What will remove the rights of UK women is policies that have Stonewall written all over them. We see today that police forces have a policy that is no more than sexual assault. It doesn't matter if its not legal- its the policy, its happening and women are having their rights removed.

I am just thoroughly sickened at how rotten this world is.

FFS. This is outrageous.

It just isnt one topic though.

It's amazing how suddenly all the professed love of multiculturalism and gay coolness and rainbows and social justice and oh wow yes safeguarding goes west the second that person's diversity conflicts with a male person's desire for self expression using them.

And usually once the lid's come off it's quite amazing what starts to come out, and how very shallow and insincere a veneer it all was in the first place. Not to mention the staggering snobbery about anyone not of the same opinions is scum who needs to be made to do what their betters tell them.

Too cynical? Well, trained by pattern recognition and experience from talking with Starmer among others. There's a lot of it about and it isn't a little not really mattering much thing.

You are too cynical. I know many irl who are rational, left-leaning, and not at all hateful, but whose thinking has gone awry on just this one topic.

They think I've been brainwashed by US Republicans/Christian Fundamentalists 'like' Badenoch/stupid celebrities 'like' Rowling/hateful anti-semitic conspiracy theorists 'like' Joyce/Tory-supporting sh*t stirrers in the MSM (they might not be 100% wrong on the last item, although they do also think the Guardian is transphobic FFS).

They think that once Labour are in power it will all go quiet, because they'll be busy fixing the economy, so trans people will no longer live in fear and can go back to quietly living their lives.

😂😂😂