Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

South Africa's Tyla sparks culture war over racial identity

91 replies

BlueBrush · 09/12/2023 09:40

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-67505674#more-menu-button

Apologies if this is too off-topic but I thought it was interesting from a general identity politics point of view.

A South African woman uses the term "coloured" to describe her racial identity, having a specific meaning in South Africa around mixed heritage. But the term "coloured" is a slur in the US, and she is receiving pushback. Another South African woman in the US, who identified herself as "coloured":

It did not go down well with her classmates; her roommate pulled her aside and said she had made the American students feel uncomfortable.
She was forced to defend her own identity, background and culture while trying to assuage the discomfort of others.

I thought it was interesting from the general point of who is and isn't allowed to choose their own identity, who is allowed to decide what is and isn't offensive. I thought of different views of the word "queer", an identity for some and a slur for others, as a contrast.

Tyla

South Africa's Tyla sparks culture war over racial identity

The term "coloured" is a slur in the US, but for millions of South Africans it is part of their identity.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-67505674#more-menu-button

OP posts:
Ilovecashews · 09/12/2023 12:25

BethDuttonsTwin · 09/12/2023 11:09

Newsflash. Academic theories around “identity” more often than not are ridiculously impractical so don’t work in real life and create more tension and division than they solve.

I find it all horrible depressing tbh. Especially when I see and hear them parroted as though fact and attempted to be applied in real life and if you don’t comform then you’re slurred as racist.

Edited

Gosh you managed to say absolutely nothing while pretending to be better than others because ‘news flash’ you ‘get it’.

RandySavage · 09/12/2023 12:22

A spokeswoman said the institution never used its previous name and requested that others called it Soas University of London

OK.
So what does the 'Soas' in 'Soas University of London' stand for?

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 12:11

Look at the website. SOAS is its name now.

A spokeswoman said the institution never used its previous name and requested that others called it Soas University of London

Lemsipper · 09/12/2023 12:09

RebelliousCow · 09/12/2023 10:14

'Oriental' to describe people of far eastern heritage is another one that really offends people in the U.S, but is normal to use in Britain.

Is it? 🤔 id never use that outside the 4 walls of my house

RebelliousCow · 09/12/2023 12:08

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 12:06

Do you mean SOAS? That officially changed its name 10 years ago?

Yes, but that is still what it stands for.

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 12:06

Do you mean SOAS? That officially changed its name 10 years ago?

RebelliousCow · 09/12/2023 12:02

theduchessofspork · 09/12/2023 11:26

It is not.

It’s an archaic term - because ‘the orient’ was a colonial expression that encompassed Western ideas of the exotic.

I know that's how Americans see it, but it is still a normal term of expresion here. We also have a school of 'Oriental and African studies'. The orient and the occident are still valid terms.

Iwasafool · 09/12/2023 11:51

RandySavage · 09/12/2023 11:06

The rules for race are as tricky as those for 'gender'.

Of course I would never intentionally use a term that offends someone, but I have never been given a rational explanation as to why 'coloured people' is offensive but 'people of colour' is polite.

I'm in my 70s so what is and isn't acceptable has changed in my lifetime. I wont tell you what my (black) husband calls himself as you'd almost certainly think it is offensive.

I struggle with person/people of colour as in my mind I associate it with slavery when the term "free person of colour" was used. Having said that I have no problem with other people using it, it just doesn't trip off the tongue for me.

Faultymain5 · 09/12/2023 11:46

theDudesmummy · 09/12/2023 11:42

I would imagine many Coloured South Africans will be furious at this attempt to deny their (very rich) culture.

Agreed all I saw when I read the exchanges is a bunch of Americans being a bunch of Americans and because they’re black believing they’re less colonial than their white counterparts. They have little to no knowledge of the rest of the world specifically South Africa and it’s complicated racial history, that is not just simply Mandela and apartheid and are happy to stay that way. Overgeneralisation of course. But very befitting for those tone deaf commentators imo

BethDuttonsTwin · 09/12/2023 11:46

Faultymain5 · 09/12/2023 11:42

And look at that!

id like someone to tell me who’s making up all the new rules without informing (getting input from) those who it is supposed to be helping.

See my post regarding earnest academic theories cooked up in US universities in the 70s/80s but which have almost zero relevance in RL. Though have somehow managed to put down very deep and solid roots in the mainstream.

DojaPhat · 09/12/2023 11:46

Apologies if this is too off-topic but I thought it was interesting from a general identity politics point of view.

Interesting, that.

BethDuttonsTwin · 09/12/2023 11:44

Faultymain5 · 09/12/2023 11:38

I’m not even sure what this means.

No one does but mostly they just roll their eyes and hide the thread so it’s good that people are asking for clarification.

JamSandle · 09/12/2023 11:42

What's offensive and what's not can be very cultural.

Faultymain5 · 09/12/2023 11:42

YouJustDoYou · 09/12/2023 11:30

LOL - proving my point. We use it, Duchess. My friends use it. I;ve never known anyone in my community, or close communities from the same part of Asia, to ever be offended. No one ever say s "far East Asian" lol.

So we'll keep using it, thanks. We don't bow down to what American's tell us how we should call ourselves.

And look at that!

id like someone to tell me who’s making up all the new rules without informing (getting input from) those who it is supposed to be helping.

theDudesmummy · 09/12/2023 11:42

I would imagine many Coloured South Africans will be furious at this attempt to deny their (very rich) culture.

YetAnotherSpartacus · 09/12/2023 11:40

I can remember back to the late 90s when even in the US 'coloured' was not always insulting. I've never lived there but I remember (for example) this was how some women on a chat site identified and they told me it was because they were not 'black' but had different colours of skin and they considered black to be too homogenous.

theDudesmummy · 09/12/2023 11:39

It is not at all the same as gender issues. A man calling themselves a woman is lying and denying reality, because he is not a woman. This artist calls herself Coloured, truthfully, because she is Coloured and always has been. With a capital letter. That is a distinctive ethnic and cultural group in South Africa, it not the same as saying "mixed race" as we would in the UK, which does not say anything about which cultural group you feel a part of. Being physically mixed race is part of being Coloured but not all of it. Calling herself Black would feel wrong for her, as to her that signifies a different group of people.

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 11:39

I thought it was interesting from the general point of who is and isn't allowed to choose their own identity, who is allowed to decide what is and isn't offensive.

Using race to bolster your gender critical position. If you can’t see the problem, you are the problem.

Faultymain5 · 09/12/2023 11:38

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 11:27

When people say they have a problem with white feminism, threads like these are part of the reason.

I’m not even sure what this means.

Faultymain5 · 09/12/2023 11:36

theduchessofspork · 09/12/2023 11:26

It is not.

It’s an archaic term - because ‘the orient’ was a colonial expression that encompassed Western ideas of the exotic.

Anymore. I grew up with the term as normal, I’m in my forties. It used to be very normal.

I have a friend who is annoyed because she was Asian growing up but now (she was told in Uni) she’s not allowed to describe herself as simply Asian, she’s south Asian (Indian background) and that the term Asian is reserved for those who used to be, what we now know is offensive (oriental).

I think you should get a say in how you describe yourself, but I also think you need to consider your audience. I would never use the N word on myself or anyone, but there are people who need to hold on to that word. I find it offensive but I’m not arguing with anyone on how they describe themselves, but if they try to use it on me we will have a problem

ditalini · 09/12/2023 11:35

Americanah by Chimanda Ngozi Adichie is an excellent book in every way, but is also interesting on the topic of African American vs African in America and how the cultures clash.

Froodwithatowel · 09/12/2023 11:31

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 11:27

When people say they have a problem with white feminism, threads like these are part of the reason.

And when people hide any thread on racism (as I'm about to do with this one) in order to escape the coming wokescolding and bunfight instead of staying, talking and learning, it's because of posts like these.

Bobtheamazinggingerdog · 09/12/2023 11:30

Queucumber · 09/12/2023 11:27

When people say they have a problem with white feminism, threads like these are part of the reason.

Could you expand on that please?

YouJustDoYou · 09/12/2023 11:30

theduchessofspork · 09/12/2023 11:26

It is not.

It’s an archaic term - because ‘the orient’ was a colonial expression that encompassed Western ideas of the exotic.

LOL - proving my point. We use it, Duchess. My friends use it. I;ve never known anyone in my community, or close communities from the same part of Asia, to ever be offended. No one ever say s "far East Asian" lol.

So we'll keep using it, thanks. We don't bow down to what American's tell us how we should call ourselves.

YouJustDoYou · 09/12/2023 11:27

My husband and I found the same - a term we and others happily use in our communities from our part of the word to describe ourselves, especially as a historical identifier from a British stand point, is immediately pounced on by arrogant Americans as "racist", "oh my god you can't use that word!" etc.

But what we find bizarre is that they tend to use "Asian American" only for Chinese Americans, whereas from a British standpooint that is ridiculous and a wide-sweeping paint brushing of a huge swathe of peoples, seeing as Asia is made up of 48 countries (which the majority of Americans can't seem to understand), many of whom have a large representative population in Britain so we use specific location identifiers rather than just "Asian". Asian who? Where? Southern? Western? Far East? And which country within those areas? So the term we use for ourselves we see as perfectly fine, it's been fine for the 4 decades we've lived here. no one in the UK has ever said anything about it or called us or others up on it, and we only had an issue when we went to America. We don't go to America any more, it;s way to racist.