I am so fascinated by the unaware or subconscious way activists only erase the female sex, as was the case here, too, given that the 'men' they discuss are penis people, right? So at least say amab.
Many of these activists, if not most, are female themselves (including journalists who write 'pregnant people' and 'men having vasectomies' in the same sentence in an article and neither the author nor the editor sees anything odd in this).
So what is driving this?
Is it just the prioritising of all things male? The old sexism working as well as ever below the surface, which makes us respect men more than women and less likely to attack them?
A deep dislike of the female body by female people, given how it is treated in porn and sexual violence and the general objectification?
Or is it that neither trans women nor trans men nor female nonbinary identifiers want to be reminded of the female body by giving it a separate name? Though the reasons here differ, of course, as trans women don't want it mentioned because they don't have it and trans men don't want it mentioned because they have it. But none of these groups cares about the male body existing or having its old name.
Or is it that male transitioners are assertive and demand these changes while female transitioners are not? And women (vulva types) given in while men (penis types) do not?
Sorry for going off on a tangent. This topic suggests to me how women got subjugated in the first place (one of the many reasons only, of course), and I so wish it was not happening for that reason.