Going to redact some of this cos I think it will fall foul of the MN censorship but I think it's really important and worth posting (personally I think the whole thread is fine and valid, but I don't want to risk it)
Dennis Noel Kavanagh at jebadoo2
1/ 15 years ago Steph could have been appointed CEO of an endometrioses charity and nothing would have happened. That was pre gender wars. Before the cancellations. Before we knew what [redacted] and before we understood their relationship with pain and oppression.
2/ Now we know. Boy, do we know. [redacted] We’ve seen their tictok videos where they implausibly claim periods and period pains. We know the elation of boundary breaking. We know about validation by forced, “be kind” subterfuges
3/ We know that [redacted] craves and values
oppression, and this can even be the medical oppression of endometriosis and casting himself as saviour figure. It can be the validation of doing womanly things like running women’s charities. Once you see this you can’t unsee it.
4/ It’s that rather simple and envious relationship with pain that is not his that transforms the selfless act of charity into the selfish act of validation or elation as passing as one of the girls. We understand this know because [redacted] themselves have told us this.
5/ That, I’m afraid, makes the vast majority of women looking at this uncomfortable and quite a few men such as myself similarly so. This rank entitlement to wade into female spaces or all kind for public gratification is now all too familiar and all too uncomfortable
6/ This is why we are hundreds or years away psychologically from a mere 15 years ago. The trans movement has been loud and clear about what [redacted] is. Gender is never less than obvious and our only crime is listening to our opponents.
7/ As I commented before, I’ve seen this somewhat with [redacted] claiming ownership of AIDS leadership in the past and HiV charities now bizarrely fixated on the trans issue. Like what women face, it’s appropriation and leadership of pain discourses.
8/ Though unlike women, I’m less likely to be told be kind or just rely on my socialisation not to make a fuss. Point is it’s the same impulse. It’s the reconfiguration of charity to self gratification and it makes the hairs on the back of our necks stand up.
Let me stress the following:
We have the Green party which doesn't talk about green issues as its core driving focus
We have Stonewall which doesn't talk about lesbians being harassed to 'do dick'
We have autism charities which don't talk about autism
We have the NHS which doesn't want to talk about women and safeguarding women (despite the number of sexual offences carried out, primarily against women by male patients)
We have women's health charity which erase the word woman and instead say they have to be inclusive despite the condition only affecting females
We have Facebook which bans women from women's support groups (or Facebook entirely) for things objecting to males policing their language.
We have rape charities which say women who object to the presence of males shouldnt be given access to services and should reframe their trauma.
I could go on with the list of Trojans who claim they are supporting one cause but their focus is actually to control women, silence them and use that organisation as a vehicle for trans activism which is against the interests of women/ other minority groups because of the conflict of interest.
This isn't about an endo charity. This is about a whole movement of Trojan horses using charities, political parties and critical institutions for a completely different purpose and agenda which detracts from what SHOULD be their primary purpose.
It's about conflict of interest and personal gain of individuals over a group which has less power and often in an effort to further lessen that power.
This is a men's rights movement.
It's a movement of the narcissistic personality.
It is not a force 'to improve the world for everyone'.