Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Good news from Caroline Farrow

336 replies

Imnobody4 · 24/10/2023 15:09

Just seen this .but sad to see it's still not over.

https://twitter.com/CF_Farrow/status/1716759272124543029?t=NeEvuc83l8mrcnzUYVAEog&s=19

I'm delighted to have received notification from the CPS via Surrey Police that following my arrest in October 2022 and then again in April 2023, I will not be prosecuted for either malicious communications or harassment.

The CPS consider that the evidential test has not been met.

I am however still being sued for "misuse of private information" and I am very well aware that the complainant will inevitably exercise their right to review the CPS decision so I will say no more, at this stage.

https://twitter.com/CF_Farrow/status/1716759272124543029?s=19&t=NeEvuc83l8mrcnzUYVAEog

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
SpiderMaan · 29/10/2023 11:52

Is Liz Fong’s thread actually defamatory tho? Perhaps Stephanknee-Marge has read it and can enlighten us?

FarEast · 29/10/2023 11:51

Well, crikey, I'd love to be able to just FIND the farmers on the internetz atm!

AlisonDonut · 29/10/2023 11:50

Stephannee · 29/10/2023 11:38

It's already been established the so-called "evidence" or whatever they call it posted on kiwifarms is false and defamation.

I hope the other victims of kiwifarms take legal action too.

https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/23/defamation-in-the-internet-age-could-a-400000-australian-court-ruling-silence-the-notorious-online-forum-kiwi-farms

Show quote history

What are you banging on about?

This is nothing to do with one woman posting on a forum in her own name.

LarkLane · 29/10/2023 11:46

I had a good feeling that this would go Caroline's way eventually. On the last stretch now, although it will take some time.

I wonder what happened to the jobsworth plod who disappeared on quite a bit of "leave" earlier in the year? All the bollocks scenarios on here from you know who about perhaps going to Australia and so on. So desperate with their smoke and mirrors to hide the truth.

Well done to Dr. Louise and CF for having such guts and determination to see this through, and to refuse to be silenced. Flowers

There's a lot of unravelling of iffy people and their links to each other in this saga, including flying monkeys, but the truth will eventually out. It always does.

SabrinaThwaite · 29/10/2023 11:40

Nothing has been established. It’s a default judgment as the defendant didn’t turn up to defend the claim.

The court can’t consider evidence if it isn’t presented to it.

Stephannee · 29/10/2023 11:38

AlisonDonut · 29/10/2023 10:56

She posts in her own name.

She has always said she posts there under her own name.

This never needed confirmation, as it is not an illegal act.

Have they got receipts on you, you seem incredibly interested in who posts on a completely unrelated non UK site.

Show quote history

It's already been established the so-called "evidence" or whatever they call it posted on kiwifarms is false and defamation.

I hope the other victims of kiwifarms take legal action too.

https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/23/defamation-in-the-internet-age-could-a-400000-australian-court-ruling-silence-the-notorious-online-forum-kiwi-farms

AlisonDonut · 29/10/2023 10:56

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:29

It proves she is a confirmed user of the site, nothing else.

Show quote history

She posts in her own name.

She has always said she posts there under her own name.

This never needed confirmation, as it is not an illegal act.

Have they got receipts on you, you seem incredibly interested in who posts on a completely unrelated non UK site.

SpiderMaan · 29/10/2023 09:26

suggestionsplease1 · 28/10/2023 22:20

Already been shared on this thread.

Show quote history

Where?

BezMills · 29/10/2023 02:36

Yay for a bit of progress. Flowers for Caroline and Dr Louise.

Not impressed with Sorry Police Force spaffing our tax money away being mugged off by a vexatious serial complainant. If the Useful Idiot cap fits, maybe they should go to a different hat supplier next time.

FarEast · 29/10/2023 01:41

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:19

As mentioned Ms Farrow is indeed a confirmed member of mentioned site.

Show quote history

So what?

it’s not illegal.

popebishop · 28/10/2023 23:47

I've seen allegations that Reddit monitors which other sites its users visit. I assume this is, again, simply untrue. If not, I'd be interested to know by which mechanisms this happens, as I have a Reddit account.

MassiveWordSalad · 28/10/2023 23:44

Anyway, good news for Caroline and @DrLouiseJMoody

This whole shitshow has been dragging on for far too long. It is utterly outrageous. I hope justice is served for Caroline one day.

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 23:18

MrsOvertonsWindow · 28/10/2023 23:16

It's odd how she attracts the fury of so many poisonous men quite openly spitting rage and throwing around allegations about her. 🤔

https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/23/defamation-in-the-internet-age-could-a-400000-australian-court-ruling-silence-the-notorious-online-forum-kiwi-farms

I agree, good to see there has been a successful court case against the malicious accusations made against her.

Whoever said they had "receipts" or "evidence" against her is talking nonsense. Hopefully this court case will mean posters on this site (Mumsnet) will also need to refrain from making defamatory allegations or claims about her too.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 28/10/2023 23:16

It's odd how she attracts the fury of so many poisonous men quite openly spitting rage and throwing around allegations about her. 🤔

Agrona · 28/10/2023 23:00

So pleased for Caroline and her family.

Strangely, people can hold different beliefs due to experience, research or not listening to others. Constantly targeting a person for not holding the same belief is vindictive.

This should not be condoned.

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:29

Pixiedust1234 · 28/10/2023 22:23

We know. She confirmed it in court papers. It actually helped prove she didn't do what her accuser said she did. Do keep up Smile

Show quote history

It proves she is a confirmed user of the site, nothing else.

Pixiedust1234 · 28/10/2023 22:23

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:19

As mentioned Ms Farrow is indeed a confirmed member of mentioned site.

Show quote history

We know. She confirmed it in court papers. It actually helped prove she didn't do what her accuser said she did. Do keep up Smile

suggestionsplease1 · 28/10/2023 22:20

SpiderMaan · 28/10/2023 22:18

please share.

Show quote history

Already been shared on this thread.

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:19

Pixiedust1234 · 28/10/2023 22:17

Please take this to the relevant thread. There are multiple kf threads here. Or take it to reddit. Or twitter. Or fb. Just not this thread please. Ta

As mentioned Ms Farrow is indeed a confirmed member of mentioned site.

SpiderMaan · 28/10/2023 22:18

suggestionsplease1 · 28/10/2023 22:18

I think the court case rulings are a pretty good indication.

Show quote history

please share.

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

suggestionsplease1 · 28/10/2023 22:18

SpiderMaan · 28/10/2023 22:15

How do you know it‘s a ‘hate site’ if you’ve never read it?

You don’t form opinions based on secondary sources do you? That would be daft.

Show quote history

I think the court case rulings are a pretty good indication.

Pixiedust1234 · 28/10/2023 22:17

Please take this to the relevant thread. There are multiple kf threads here. Or take it to reddit. Or twitter. Or fb. Just not this thread please. Ta

Transparent2 · 28/10/2023 22:16

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:04

of what?

Show quote history

I wouldn’t know. I’ve never been on KF and I don’t know the gentleman(?) in question. But keeping receipts refers to having evidence.

SpiderMaan · 28/10/2023 22:15

Stephannee · 28/10/2023 22:14

I don't visit hate sites as mentioned above.

Could you kindly present your evidence here? Do you have a news article or court records or similar?

Show quote history

How do you know it‘s a ‘hate site’ if you’ve never read it?

You don’t form opinions based on secondary sources do you? That would be daft.