Z cup teacher is back in a new school

I spy with my little eye something beginning with 'f'.

Surely locking all but one of the external doors is a fire risk?

Especially 'no giant hugely fake looking ridiculous carbuncle's masquerading as nipples'.

It's like I always think about DQST - if a woman wanted to dress up in Ann Summers crap and waltz into the local library desperately looking for kids to read to, questions would be asked, she would be stopped, the police would be called.

Same with this: a woman presenting like this would lose her job in five minutes flat.

I would have thought "no visible nipples" a reasonable dress code for teachers of either sex.

Fucking fetishist.

I wonder if the children and other teachers have dress codes to follow, which is standard in schools.

If TWAW then they need to be held to the same standards as women. A woman parading around like that would get short shrift if she applied for a teaching job. What makes this individual so special that everyone is falling over themselves to welcome him into a job where he will be working with children, while sporting giant prosthetic breasts with erect nipples? This is clearly fetishwear and if the authorities cannot see that, I think they’re beyond help. I’d take my children out of the school and either homeschool them or find somewhere else for them to go.

It's not just the cartoon boobs is it? Why the need for the short tight skirts too? In the UK this wouldn't be considered appropriate workwear for teachers.

It's almost as if this person enjoys being viewed as a sexual being inside a school.

Lots of men who identify as women and work in schools will wear breasts. I dont know how schools can avoid it.

This obviously looks extreme, but how can policy be written to allow a man to wear breasts, but not get to this position? Is this size any more or less a fetish than a man wearing a B cup?

I really dislike how the “hoax” people are, presumably unconsciously, rewriting reality to pretend that a fetishist who puts on a sexual display in front of the schoolchildren in his care has somehow got noble motives.

People are often driven to make excuses for male sexual predators. This seems like a variation on the same old script.

(And there are so many examples of these men going to extremes with their entitled behaviour and making their movement look ridiculous. I’m unclear why this one specifically is getting the “hoax” treatment.)

Whether he is doing it to show the madness of Canadian policies or because he has a fetish either way the people who are being affected by this are children. I would not be happy if it was my kids being used in this way.

Wow, how awful for those kids, locked in with this guy.

Quite apart from anything else, surely locking doors as suggested is a fire risk?

In the mists of time, I remember a story of a Labour Party member who applied to join the women's policy unit. Natal male, full beard etc.
He claimed that he was female and male on different days at particular times. When his beard felt "feminine" and he was most definitely not a he.

He...got...the...job. Particularly commended by leader Corbyn who said he was a welcome female addition to the group.
To work alongside other women on all the stuff that matters to women.

In getting the job, he resigned, claiming his whole story was a hoax, to show the preposterousness of these matters.
He promptly got thrown out of the party.
Ironic, insult women, get promoted. Insult the party (ie men like Corbyn), get penalised.

I remain convinced this is all a hoax. This guy is looking to see how far he can push things. How much he can expose Canada for supreme batshittery. He's doing a fine fine job.

This situation is absurd and I’d be deeply concerned if I was a parent with a child here. I agree with those saying there is clearly something very untoward going on….

BUT this stuff with hints about dads doing violence does nothing at all for the cause of keeping children safe. I’m against any vigilante stuff or hints of it. We must keep the moral high ground in my view.

this person was doing this as a protest about something, a protest about the policies or something that had happened to him?

That was made up out of whole cloth, I think by people who don’t have much theory of mind. It never made any sense. Occam’s razor says that a man who walks around in fetishwear in public is motivated by a fetish.

Surely they are not teaching in school like this ? Bra less ? It's got to be a wind up

I’d club together with the other parents and hire a private detective and really have a good look at this bloke’s life.

But in the short term, I’d remove my children from the school before he joined.

Somehow I don’t think my DH, or any of the other school Dads would be too welcoming of this teacher, and I think they’d find a way of making that very, very clear.

No, I think it was people speculating that it may be that as it's otherwise just so ridiculous.

Have I got my wires crossed but I thought on other threads I read that this person was doing this as a protest about something, a protest about the policies or something that had happened to him?

Cant quite remember the details but its like putting 2 fingers up to his employers rather than an actual trans thing?

So they have moved him to get him away from the mad angry parents and in order to facilitate his move, are locking kids in and parents out.

As a parent I’d be very suspicious of the motives of the people who made this employment decision.

Outrageous. Female staff in our school have been spoken to about short skirts and open toed sandals. Sixth form are told that if clothing is inappropriate they will be sent home to change.

Those poor students being sacrificed on the alter of GI.

Every adult that allows, encourages or even just ignores this should be deeply ashamed of their ignorance and cowardice. I hope they are also aware of the contempt decent people who wish to safeguard children feel for each and every one of them.

Madness

Ah, same board.

'Oakville Trafalgar High - which is governed by the same school board'