Z cup teacher is back in a new school

New look. I thought their breasts were real? 🤷‍♀️😁

Apparently she’s removed her breasts and turned up for work in trousers with a small beard. 🤷‍♀️

You have my sympathy, Timoth.

Hi, I am in Halton with 2 kids in this board, the whole thing is a mess. I am all for teachers having private lives but he was found sneaking into a girls dance recital in Burlington for the second half plonked himself in the front row presumably to do a bit of upskirt filming in his massive boobs in 2021. How you don't get sacked for that I do not know. I've written to the trustees about it but they never get back and they keep going offline in the broadcasted Board meetings citing "privacy". The teachers have been writing "they/Them" pronouns on some of the report cards and they are thinking of making it mandatory. I would go private or homeschool except having visited them, it doesn't seem that they are immune to this either. I would move back but I'm not sure things are better anywhere else..

I believe I saw him at the Starbucks a few years ago and he wasn't as busty. The supermarket opposite had put up a sign saying the woman's bathroom was a trans-friendly space, but someone must have pointed out this double standard and a few months later, they put the sign on both doors. The dolts.

This is about what should be expected when programs like that are targeted at identity groups rather than those in need. It happens a lot in the US, and Canada for that matter. It creates incredible resentment and cynicism among those who are in the same circumstances but not eligible for help.

I have just seen a US utuber advising all male small business owners apply for any government business grant support for women and dare the government to challange them by saying that males self IDing as a woman dont qualify.

I will be voting for 'the other party'
https://www.standingforwomen.com/
Posie Parker aka Kellie Jay Keen

Ryan Webb did similar. I didn't initially cop that he was calling out how ridiculous self ID is

Someone should pop them!

Its almost like someone is having a laugh, saying ok - lets see how far you will go to be truly woke you idiots. How much idiocy are you going to accept.

How very transphobic of Peto.

Surely that's being genderfluid. And genderfluidity comes under the trans umbrella.

Didn't Pips Bunce who presents as male on some days of the week and female on others, ergo is genderfluid, even get an award?

"Heather Peto, a trans woman who was selected by her local party in Rushcliffe and Melton to be on the all-women shortlist last year, said: “Labour’s complaint procedure keeps getting brought into disrepute. Today it is a person who is trying to undermine the party’s trans-inclusive policy by pretending to be a woman for the day.”

Omg 😂so what does Peto think he's doing?

The thing is, if you pass laws making "gender expression" sacrosanct, something which people are unable to criticise (and can in fact be punished for criticising) but without defining either "gender" or "gender expression", you cannot control, regulate or ban anything any individual claims is an expression of their gender.

You see, if you decide that fake breasts on a male person are totally legitimate, in fact, 'stunning and brave', then how can you say that these particular fake breasts are a problem?

Kathleen Stock once talked about how there is a philosophical question about how many grains of rice make a heap? If you keep adding one grain of rice at a time then when exactly does it become a heap. She mused that there is a similar philosophical question here, at what cup size do fake breasts on a man become unacceptable?

why in the name of all that is holy would a SECOND school hire him? I can sort of understand why the first school felt lumbered with him when he started doing it after he was already employed (though I think they’re pathetic cowards failing to safeguard children), but why would any other school ever hire this obvious pervert? WHY?!

Z Cup...profane. Fail the regulations.
Pornographic. Ditto.
Threatens health and safety. Have you seen that photo of Kayla in the machine shop?

Had a quick search, there doesn't seem to be much of a dress code for students:

https://www.hwdsb.on.ca/blog/student-dress-code-guidelines-and-next-steps/

One could argue that if same standards were applied for students and staff, the teacher in question would possibly fall foul of this clause:

• May not wear anything that promotes or symbolizes drugs, alcohol, illegal activity, hate or discrimination, profanity, pornography; that incites violence or harassment; or threatens health and safety

Often when faced with unreasonable policy/behavior some people try and come up with good motivations/reasons why it's reasonable staring from position it must be as most people are reasonable.

The actual situation doesn't change here if they have a "good reason" - the good reason provided might not be true anyway - it's a socially unacceptable way to dress in professional environment with potential to cause offense to colleagues and distress to pupils.

Because in any population there are unreasonable people who for many reasons push boundaries there are usually policies in place to deal with such people - that seems to be what is missing here - the authority who ever that is saying no these are the rules everyone follows to work in this environment.

Mulder and Scully usually disagreed.
Then again, that was three decades ago, a lot can and did happen in the meantime in Canada.

I've noticed this in Canadians generally. Lovely people but with an apparent inability to voice any form of disagreement.

Yes this is a huge generalisation obvs.

So the fake breasts are kind of pantomime breasts. Ridiculing female bodies.
If he likes wearing them in front of children but doesnt bother out of the classroom, then that does pose a question.

Also, I remember at school that children make fun of even the slightest aberration. What on earth do they make of it. What on earth do parents think.
It seems we are all too afraid to complain.

All these safeguarding measures and police checks in schools, churches, institutions and for anyone who works with children, yet you cant help thinking that predators have found a way of coming in through the woke door blatantly laughing.

This YouTube video about the current state of affairs in Canada is interesting and disturbing

AG in all its warped glory. Canada is the wokest country in the world ATM. God knows what's possessed anyone to employ this blatant fetishism

This kind of sloppy sloppy legislation doesn't seem to be confined to gender questions, though.

It seems like the current Liberal government, and I feel like it's the same in many other places, thinks the main point of legislating is just a kind of virtue signal, to show the country, or the citizens, or the world, what the right things to think are.

There is none of the serious work involved in making good strong laws that work to actually do something, and protect against abuse of the law, opportunism, are consistent with other legislation, or even just confusion.

People who ask questions about these topics, or whether certain ideas are best dealt with by legislation at all, are characterized as bad people, bigots, racists, whatever.

It's a bit like the way in the UK you will see people who are wary of hate crime bills, for very solid reasons, be called bigots. As if not supporting them means they agree it is good to hate women (or whomever.)

The gender ideology elements are some of the worst in that they effect is so devastating, ultimately because it is so anti-reality. But it all reflects this weird, sloppy approach to governance.

Megan Murphy was outraged over this, way back when (C16 I think?). I remember her saying they were passing laws based on gender and gender identity, without actually defining what gender even meant. She couldn't believe it was going through legal process without a legal definition.

And she subsequently got kicked off Twitter for commenting on a photo of Jessica Yaniv with the words 'yes, that's him.'

There are a lot of people highly invested in creating laws that cement male supremacism and use women as props, and worse.

Absolutely. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Or at least, good intentions that have not been properly considered, means-tested, or taken to their logical conclusion. But that sounds less pithy I guess