Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

As Labour recommits to introducing tougher ‘hate crime’ laws, a new paper highlights the need to protect free speech in the face of trans activists’ pro-censorship demands

31 replies

IwantToRetire · 23/08/2023 00:43

Trans activists’ demands to shutdown dissent is a major threat to free speech.

  • Transgender individuals should be entirely free to identify with their chosen gender – and equally, contrary opinions on trans identity and policy should be debatable.
  • Influential activist groups like Stonewall and Mermaids advocate for gender critical views to be criminalised under ‘hate speech’ laws.
  • Expanding hate speech laws threatens debate on controversial issues such as gender self-identification laws, female-only spaces in hospitals, and single-sex sports.
  • Labour MP Graham Stringer says the paper “skewers the authoritarianism and the irrationality of the transgender ideology” while Conservative MP Nick Fletcher says it is a “much-needed wake-up call to libertarians and conservatives”.

As Labour recommits to introducing tougher ‘hate crime’ laws, a new paper highlights the need to protect free speech in the face of trans activists’ pro-censorship demands.

Marc Glendening, paper author and Head of Cultural Affairs at the free market Institute of Economic Affairs, cites a series of high profile cases to demonstrate that activists “do not aim to win the debate but rather to prevent debate from occurring”, including:

  • Mermaids and Stonewall claiming that opposition to self-identification constitutes ‘hate speech’ and that it should be banned;
  • Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s intention to bolster hate crime legislation to make sure “every LGBT+ crime is treated as an aggravated offence,” raising concerns that ‘misgendering’ people could lead to a criminal conviction;
  • Police investigations of individuals for expressing gender critical views under existing public order offence laws and the recording of ‘non-crime hate incidents’;
  • Harassment and threats towards gender critical voices such as Rosie Duffield and attempts to physically prevent gender critical voices from speaking publicly;
  • Preventing medical professionals from providing non-affirming gender identity care under the auspices of banning ‘conversion therapy’.

https://iea.org.uk/media/dont-outlaw-gender-critical-views-says-new-paper/

OP posts:
PorcelinaV · 23/08/2023 12:14

What I see in practice is, "We don't deny biological reality", "there is a difference between biology and gender".

So why are you trying to change sex on a birth certificate?

You don't deny biology, but you want to falsify it on official documents, or you want to keep it secret?

You don't deny biology, but suddenly it doesn't matter for sports? Why aren't you willing to compete in sports according to your biological sex category?

User601 · 23/08/2023 10:52

Fuck that's scary.

Imnobody4 · 23/08/2023 10:46

Haven't read the whole paper but the last paragraph nails it.

^The movement seeks to sweep away conventionally determined beliefs concerning the nature of existence and to reject the view that language can reflect observable reality. This is a prerequisite for the making of a new order. If there is no recognition of our right as individuals to pursue and share with others what we believe to be objectively true, then there is no way for us to democratically and peaceably navigate how we should live as a political community. There is only the assertion of raw political power by one political perspective upon the rest. This is the goal to which transgender ideology, together with its closely associated doctrines, is
now working.^

turbonerd · 23/08/2023 07:37

And they are correct. Free speech is very much under attack from trans activists.
I hope this receives due consideration from the politicians.

PorcelinaV · 23/08/2023 00:54

Mermaids and Stonewall claiming that opposition to self-identification constitutes ‘hate speech’ and that it should be banned

What? Really?

I agree that trans-activists tend to be authoritarians that want to censor, but did they go that far?