Yet more police idiocy.

God! Even after reading about the person we were trying to be very careful about, the fact was

YOU refused to see what was right in front of you.
YOU refused to go off and read about it so that you could see why no one was prepared to state with 100% ANYTHING.

Despite being told many times by individual posters that they did actually know who was involved and what was going and where you too could find this information even though we couldn't literally spoon feed it to you due to the limitations imposed on us by mumsnet, you still insisted on writing WE.

Do us all a favour from now on Felix and just write

I think
I can't assume
I don't Know

Yes felix we do know because its always the same. Things are about to get very nasty for certain people because things can't be hidden any more.

@Felix125 can you give it a rest with the forced teaming. It’s manipulative.

There isn’t a “we” that includes you.

Boiledbeetle
YOU didn't know. WE (majority of posters) did know. You were constantly told to go and look into it to read up and then you would to. But YOU decided not to.

And when asked - "are you 100% certain its the same person?" - the majority of posters said that they can't be 100% certain, but it is more than likely to be him.

So I said that until you are certain, then you ac't assume. And hence you can't automatically link the previous incidents together.

Now that we are certain its the same person, they can be linked.

And do we know what this current allegation is?

The no further action was in relation to the girl so she was released and no further action was being taken against her. I'm not sure the results of the investigation into the police's behaviour has concluded yet

Is there really to be no further action?

The Blackbelt Barrister has posted a short (8.30min) video. It's his thoughts on the supportive tweets from WYP's Madd'un and another copper. I don't think 8t adds much to what's already on the thread but I'll post it for completeness and for those interested.

It's had over 45k views and 1k comments so there's still interest.

It's like when the WYP told me that they had no evidence against Jimmy Savile. The reason there was no evidence was they destroyed it all. They attacked and threatened any woman/girl who provided it.

@Felix125 why do the police so consistently pretend to be shocked about child abusers when women have known and been shouting for a long time?

Oh felix. No no no!

YOU didn't know. WE (majority of posters) did know. You were constantly told to go and look into it to read up and then you would to. But YOU decided not to.

This isn't a WE thing this is a YOU thing.

Less of the 'we' business. Everyone except you knew. And you were constantly told where to look.

I refer you to the title of the thread.

Boiledbeetle
Posted on that thread

But in essence, throughout the threads I said that we don't know who the reporting person was and what the specific allegation is against CF.

So now we do know, we can make a much more informed opinion. And now that it is all linked to previous allegations, this can be taken into consideration in the investigation.

https://twitter.com/LesDennis/status/1110678394461700097

Mavis "well I don't really know"

If it stops a repeat of we just don't know, then it's all good!

@Boiledbeetle I suspect felix may be some time. Its a very uphill read with a lot of peaks to climb over

Hmmmmm. I'm feeling kind.

Happy reading.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4874598-stephanie-hayden-sexually-assaulted-child-was-registered-sex-offender?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

Boiledbeetle

Can't see it - is there a link?

I am waiting for Sorry Police, the responsible PCC and of course PC Useful to enlighten us as to what the actual FLIP they have been up to recently wrt CF.

I'll wait. I gots nothing but time. Tiiiiiiiiiime. Tick Tock.

Afternoon @Felix125

The answer to all your Caroline Farrow unanswered "but we don't know who it is" questions lie in a thread on this board just waiting for you to arrive to read it. But hurry it's filling up fast.

All hail Andrew Tate!

I agree - but I don't think that 7 cops were dispatched for the purpose of dealing with the teenage girl. I suspect the cop present shouted for assistance, so the other cops had to divert from what ever they were doing. They probably didn't know what was at the other end until they arrived.

But you are right. The cop should not have reacted the way she did and should have just walked away from the teenage girl. She was back with her family and safe - any comments made by her should have been ignored by the cop.

The other cops could have carried on with what they were dealing with - and probably never got chance to go back to them.

@ReginaRegina if SEVEN police officers hadn't turned up to terrorise an autistic child for saying something socially awkward in her own home, they could have all been responding to the many actual crimes that go ignored.

We don't have any pin badges for vegans.

What we do have in our Whats App group if an officer who is intolerant to milk, so they can request some soya milk when they need some.

Depends....does it have any vegans?

LarkLane

I agree with you - I am just asking the question from a post by MissLucyEyelesbarrow - 'should they keep their jobs if its not a crime to be racist etc.'

In my opinion - of course they shouldn't. And it does go against Police regulations as you rightly said.

That's why I am against rainbow painted cars, rainbow lanyards, poppies, charity pin badges or aligning to a specific charity etc.

The only Whats App group we have concerns who is bringing the milk in for the day, which obviously isn't offensive.