Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Transwomen v. deceptive men are a threat

59 replies

pantsforteaagain · 26/07/2023 11:09

I am just reading about Keir Starmer on Radio 5 live about the new stance by Labour on transwomen. The interviewer was talking about how women need safe spaces in case transwomen are a threat, e.g. Isla Bryson. But surely most people are worried about men being deceptive and pretending to be trans in order to access single-sex spaces. That seems much more likely to happen, and that is relevant because the response is always "but that, i.e. transwomen being a threat, hardly ever happens". Do people not say it because they are are scared to say out loud that some transwomen are a fraud? It seems such an obvious and important distinction to me.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
ILikeDungs · 03/05/2024 19:22

I understand IamaRevenant how difficult it can be. I have a brother who was swiftly whooshed through full surgery as soon as a mental confusion arose. He claims womanhood and I use his chosen name but not female pronouns. It helps that his new name is used for both sexes, that does make it easier. And that we live many miles apart.

Reassure your neighbour that misgendering is NOT a hate crime. The GRC (if he has one) is an understanding between the government and the GRC holder. Individuals are not required to get involved in the falsehood.

IamaRevenant · 03/05/2024 16:22

ILikeDungs · 01/05/2024 20:41

He's a predatory bloke. Don't take women's words and apply them to a man who you admit is a male, and a threat to women.

Edited to say this comment is for IamaRevenant

Edited

I agree with you, thank you for pointing this out. I do use chosen pronouns usually as I have a couple of transwoman friends who have lived as women their entire adult life and I respect them (they are similar to the kind of transwomen referred to by @Bovrilla, very respectful of women's spaces etc and generally just living a quiet life bothering nobody). But I don't respect him whatsoever and he is a predator. So him it is.

Although the last time someone called him that to his face (another neighbour, again one he's targeted as she's bi so apparently owes him sex) he called the police and reported her for a hate crime 🙄

illinivich · 03/05/2024 08:54

fungipie · 01/05/2024 20:40

Totally disagree. Those who have undergone full transition, hormonal and physical, have done so as they do not want to be associated with male violence. They suffer terribly because of the behaviour, beliefs and attitudes, including violence towards them- of men who 'pretend', for all the wrong reasons, it seems.

There's no such thing as a full transition. Its impossible to transition to be the opposite sex, making distinctions between no, partial and full transition is meaningless. A man is a man regardless of what he does to his body.

Those who have undergone full transition, hormonal and physical, have done so as they do not want to be associated with male violence.

It would be unethical for the medical profession to give drugs and surgery to men for that reason.

Thatsalotnora · 03/05/2024 07:43

TommyNever · 26/07/2023 21:00

You do have to wonder how they expect GC people to make any sense of this distinction.

Perhaps it's: "Men really pretending to be women, vs. Men pretending to be men pretending to be women."

Either way, all these nonsensical problems can be avoided by identifying people by their sex, and ensuring that women can retain safe single-sex spaces.

Well this.

We have safe spaces because men are a threat. So all men are out, no exceptions.

You know, ‘non-acceptance without exception’.

That is the basic and necessary safeguarding principle of single sex spaces.

KnickerlessParsons · 03/05/2024 07:39

Most people don't murder other people, but there's a law against murder

Most people don't steal from other people, but there's a law against stealing

Most people don'd evade paying their taxes, but there's a law against tax evasion

The laws are there to protect the majority from the minority - do you get my drift....?

CheeseSandwichRiskAssessment · 02/05/2024 22:59

I don't want any man at all in my single sex spaces.

This is not so much because I feel under threat (although that danger is of course there), more that I simply like having a break from men: the way they change a dynamic, the male gaze, and the way they take up physical and metaphorical space differently than women.

anothernamitynamenamechange · 02/05/2024 08:12

We can't read minds - no-one can. Its impossible to tell the difference between Bob the axe-murderer and Bob the pacifist who fosters injured kittens. Its also impossible to tell the difference between a man pretending to be a woman and a man pretending to pretend to be a woman and its silly to try.

I think part of the issue is some men get quite sensitive to women talking about male violence etc because they feel they as individuals are being unfairly judged. But it isn't that all men are bad. Its just that it isn't possible, on meeting a stranger, to read their minds - all you can go of is how they act (are they impinging on my personal space, trying to corner me, following me into the toilets etc). Most men, at least when they have daughter, do realise this so they know really. If we were saying many men are violent so we should be allowed to shoot them that would be crazy. But its perfectly reasonable to say - many men are violent/dangerous we should be allowed to take steps to make ourselves safe. Only males that don't want women to be safe would object. And those males (be they trans or otherwise) are not good people

ILikeDungs · 01/05/2024 20:41

He's a predatory bloke. Don't take women's words and apply them to a man who you admit is a male, and a threat to women.

Edited to say this comment is for IamaRevenant

Bovrilla · 01/05/2024 20:41

It's like the whole man Vs bear debate. We all know we choose the bear because we know what we're getting into with a bear etc.

There's a core of amazing transwomen who are sensitive to women, who use the disabled loo etc as they hate the idea of alienating the people they want to assimilate with. Who can and do have nuanced debate, understanding of many women's position and view and are willing to talk and engage with it (I'm thinking her of Alexis Evans etc). They must get so exasperated by the fact their more reasoned voices are incessantly drowned out by the TRAs.

fungipie · 01/05/2024 20:40

Nellodee · 27/07/2023 08:01

Males can be gender dysphoric. Males can be sexually abusive.
Males can be gender dysphoric and sexually abusive.

Being “genuine trans” does not lessen the likelihood of being sexually abusive. I’ll be generous and leave it there.

Totally disagree. Those who have undergone full transition, hormonal and physical, have done so as they do not want to be associated with male violence. They suffer terribly because of the behaviour, beliefs and attitudes, including violence towards them- of men who 'pretend', for all the wrong reasons, it seems.

IamaRevenant · 01/05/2024 20:34

My neighbour is a threat and a fraud for sure. Holding 'pyjama parties', 'accidentally' booking a double room instead of two separate rooms on a trip with a female friend to 'see what happens', asking me and DH to leave them alone with our friend when she was drunk so they could take advantage. Amongst other things.

I have genuinely trans friends and family members so no underlying issue with people being trans so long as they don't encroach on women's prisons/hospital wards/sports. I honestly do think my neighbour is faking this to try and guilt women into having sex with them. She's a predatory bloke with a beard in a dress and a 'lady penis' (her words) so far as I'm concerned. She frequently rants to me that nobody wants to be with her and they're transphobes because they won't.

Unfortunately I have to walk past her door whenever I leave my flat so the rants just go on and on.

SaltPorridge · 01/05/2024 20:30

Isn't one reason why would-be trans women want to go into the ladies because they have been told to "live as a woman" in order to qualify for medication/ surgery / a GRC? And the reality is that using the ladies loos is one of the few characteristics of living as a woman.

FrippEnos · 01/05/2024 20:17

popebishop · 27/07/2023 21:39

There isn't really any such thing as "genuinely" trans. Trans means anyone who says they are - it's an indefinable feeling and there is no "test" for it.

This is the problem with self-id. A male who says they are a female isn't somehow more female if they genuinely hold beliefs that having certain personality traits makes you female, or think the right things, or say the right words.

You could argue that having or not having certain body parts makes you more female, but that doesn't really apply to self-id.

This ^

By saying that anyone that is trans is trans means that they can't say those that they don't like are not trans.

But then logic has never stopped them from changing the definition of things and people.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 17:09

I get what you mean but with single sex it’s just down to privacy, dignity and safety for me

And allowing any male is the issue

MarvellousMonsters · 01/05/2024 17:06

castlesandsand · 26/07/2023 19:49

The problem with TW/TM etc is that they are obsessed with gender, sex and themselves. To them it is inconceivable that people are just not interested and can really do with a break at getting this ideology & pronoun rules shoved in their faces.

But at the end of the day they are pretending to be someone they are not &, like the tale of the scorpion & the frog, men will be men, it is in their nature. No matter how good the wig, thick the makeup and frilly the dress.

This sums up my issues with the trans agenda. They are obsessed with gender stereotypes, and rather than making a more equal society, this thinking divides and separates men and women even more. To define us by our clothes, choices, interests, hair length and 'feelings' undoes decades of equality campaigning and reduces us all to stereotypes.

muddyford · 01/05/2024 13:58

Bloody excellent thread.

Dineasair · 01/05/2024 13:54

MariaVT65 · 27/07/2023 10:30

Excellent post.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Dineasair · 01/05/2024 13:52

Tootingbec · 27/07/2023 08:23

This is about safeguarding not about transwomen. We have safeguarding in place for vulnerable adults (which includes women) and children not because we believe that all teachers or sports coaches or vicars or care workers (or transwomen) are abusers etc but to minimise the risk that someone with the intention to harm can have access to vulnerable groups.

There is no Teachers Rights Group complaining that not allowing male teachers into girls changing rooms is labelling all male teachers as predatory.

This is about protecting women and girls and if that means a tiny minority of people don’t get free reign to over ride over safeguarding policies (many of which only appeared after awful scandals) then so be it!

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Well said

Dineasair · 01/05/2024 13:51

JacquelinePot · 27/07/2023 08:10

All men claiming to be women are being deceptive, some are also deceiving themselves. What you've got is either a man claiming to be a woman or a man claiming to be claiming to be a woman. Both are men stepping over women's boundaries, both are unwelcome in women's spaces.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Dineasair · 01/05/2024 13:49

Hepwo · 26/07/2023 11:15

This whole "deceptive men" argument is a red herring. It isn't my issue.

The "men" issue is my issue.

I think this argument gathered pace because people could say it's not about you (the TW they are talking to), it's about them over there.

For me it was always about all men.

I agree.

Circumferences · 27/07/2023 23:02

TRA will always paint the GC position as being totally ridiculous.
We're "trying to deny the existence of trans people"
We're "calling trans women sex pests and predators"
We're "hostile and threatening to gender non conforming women"
We therefore "should die in a grease fire/choke on dick etc etc"

We can't really have reasonable discussion with that level of disingenuousness

popebishop · 27/07/2023 21:54

JaukiVexnoydi · 26/07/2023 18:26

The concept of "fraudulence"/"deceptiveness" is a red herring.

There's no externally verifiable way to define what it "feels like" to be a woman and no way to verify whether what any particular person feels about themselves is "correct" even if such a definition could exist.

Whether or not a specific individual meets such a definition, if it could exist, could only be based on what they say and do, and that may or may not be honest but whether or not it is is irrelevant.

When men are excluded from something it is not because all men are dangerous or predatory or whatever. The vast majority of men excluded are honourable and lovely people. The vast majority of transwomen excluded are honourable and lovely people. The exclusion isn't a judgement of whether they are honourable and lovely, or whether they have lied about their feelings, or whether those feelings are correctly "feminine" whatever that means. The only externally verifiable fact is whether or not they are male (and that is not affected by dress, or hormone treatments, or surgery)

If there's a legitimate reason for something to be single-sex then whatever that reason is applies to all males regardless of gender identity and regardless of whether their professed belief in themselves as feminine is honest. But the point is that those transwomen excluded are no more being insulted/demeaned or under-suspicion than any of the perfectly lovely male-identifying men who are also excluded.

Theoretically a predator might have just as "honest"/"genuine" feelings about their gender as a perfectly lovely non-predatory transwoman. Their honesty/genuineness is not a useful measure of whether they are a threat even if it could be measured. Their exclusion is not therefore a judgement on their honesty/genuineness.

Basically this post said it better than me!

Froodwithatowel · 27/07/2023 21:47

Quite. If you respect transgender people and the concept of transition then it is necessary that you respect someone is who they say they are without it being relevant what crimes they may have committed, or any other aspect. You cannot say to someone that they may not transition because of reasons, but others can.

And equally, you cannot permit dangerous biological males who predate upon women into women's spaces where they are vulnerable, whether or not those males have transitioned.

Transitioning does not change or end the behaviours of a male who is predatory, as was clearly known even before the infamous names and the trail of women harmed by self ID.

And equally, if you respect women and see them as equal humans to male transitioners, you cannot provide inclusion for any male people into female spaces, while then excluding female people from the female space and therefore any space at all, if those female people are of the vulnerable groups who cannot use mixed sex spaces. It makes no difference how lovely or safe those male people are: those female people lose everything to provide those male people with more freedom of choice and comfort. That's basic discrimination and unacceptable inequality, it is wrong.

The obvious answer is that anyone can obviously and rightfully transition as they want to and without restriction. And that third spaces are created, and male and female people can choose between their sex based spaces and the mixed sex/gender neutral space depending on their personal access needs. Women using a mixed sex space are therefore willingly consenting to use a mixed sex space and accepting and consenting to the risks involved.

It will require firm boundaries and probably an awareness raising campaign that for male people to invade a female only provided space or resource is an act of aggression and exclusion that will not be tolerated, and that they are required to respect female needs, access and equality in the same way that they require their own to be respected. They cannot remove resources or access from women for no other reason than wanting to, or the thought of a women's facility they cannot use being threatening to their sense of identity. They may need help with that, but the answer cannot be that women just suck up being subhuman.

popebishop · 27/07/2023 21:39

There isn't really any such thing as "genuinely" trans. Trans means anyone who says they are - it's an indefinable feeling and there is no "test" for it.

This is the problem with self-id. A male who says they are a female isn't somehow more female if they genuinely hold beliefs that having certain personality traits makes you female, or think the right things, or say the right words.

You could argue that having or not having certain body parts makes you more female, but that doesn't really apply to self-id.

Froodwithatowel · 27/07/2023 21:38

How do you tell the difference?

What about Karen White and Katie Dolotowski? Are they pretending too? Who is to tell a transitioner whether or not they are genuine, or prevent either of those two serious sex offenders from presenting as women and walking into women's spaces? Incidentally both of them used their access to women's spaces to assault women and young girls, White left a woman so seriously injured from multiple rapes she may never have children.

If a genuine transwoman is also a rapist, what should happen?

And whether transwomen are sincere in their transition or not, what do we do about this large group of vulnerable women excluded from any access at all to provide these male people with their preferred choice from all the facilities?