Couple of interesting comments on the "Is There a Doctor in the House" article by
JENNIFER LAHL MA, BSN, RN AND KALLIE FELL, MS, BSN, RN
17 July 2023
https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/is-there-a-doctor-in-the-house/comment/20949931
Sandra Pinches
"I attended a workshop led by a trans man who is a local expert on transitioning. He told us that testosterone has such powerful effects on a woman's body that she can be fully transitioned within a few months to male voice range, development of male hair distribution, and muscle if she works out hard enough. He said that most female patients slow down the process by taking lower doses of testosterone, just because they don't want to be stressed by the rapid physical changes. Women who take the maximum allowed dosages don't have to keep taking testosterone. A lot of them do, because they think of it as a "male hormone" and because they like the energizing, antidepressant effects of it. "Pausing" the administration of testosterone will not result in a woman returning to a female appearance, as the voice and hair distribution changes are permanent once established. That is why detransitioners continue to speak in the male range, and if they have developed male pattern hair loss, they are probably stuck with it. The entire argument that pausing the testosterone injections would have an adverse impact on a woman who wants to be a man is invalid."
Genderwang
Excellent point!
So if the whole premise is invalid then the rationale for not pausing (or not stopping) testosterone medication is what?
To enable experimentation on foetuses in utero and breast-feeding babies?
Or, since the paper's authors consider "non-normative" offspring to be potentially good for society and "trans people": to facilitate the production of children and adults with sometimes very serious, life-long medical conditions as well as sometimes ambiguous genitalia and "non-normative" secondary sexual characteristics?
- "These offspring-focused risk-avoidance strategies and approaches are, we argue, part of the gendered precautionary labor of pregnancy and pregnancy care itself, and not without potentially-harmful consequences for trans people and society more broadly."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321523000811?via%3Dihub#sec1.2
The research paper should be titled "Queering Eugenics".
-------
This is another very good, detailed take-down - which also makes the link with Eugenics:
Defending the Indefensible or It’s Not Us Who Are Acting Like Nazis
Science without conscience is but the ruin of the soul - Francois Rabelais
LUCY LEADER 30 June 2023
It ends:
"Where Hitler viewed his country and society as a body that needed to be purged of viruses in the form of groups of people who didn’t conform to his conception of normal, those under the spell of queer theory believe that normal society needs to be broken up by altering bodies to negate what evolution has designed us to be, even if the price is so harmful that lives are made miserable and short in the process. Both Hitler and the queer theorists blur boundaries, trade in beliefs over facts and twist science into self-serving fictions that have caused great distress and harm to large populations.
I’d say if those who like to go to women’s rights rallies to berate women for believing in biological facts want to bring their swastikas along, they are in good company with the little man with the moustache. I’m not on board with that brand of Gleichschaltung."
("Gleichschaltung" is explained earlier in the article)
https://lucyleader.substack.com/p/defending-the-indefensible-or-its