Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Pilgrim Tucker v Open University

57 replies

Signalbox · 01/07/2023 08:32

Another GC discrimination case against Open University.

Pilgrim Tucker is a community organiser and campaigner who supported the Grenfell Tower Residents campaign, the Grenfell Action Group. Her PhD with the OU is based on her activism.

If you google Pilgrim Tucker Crowdjustice you will find her page with the relevant information.

OP posts:
pinklama · 01/07/2023 13:31

Gender politics should not be impacting education - after years of fighting for having the same options for males\females\furries whatever it should not be brought into the classroom. The same goes for the workplace. If it is not relevant to what you are working on all this should be left at the door.

and adults should not be sharing with others.

Rightsraptor · 01/07/2023 12:59

I've noticed an increase lately in shared rooms on any residential course. No doubt the organisers would say it's about keeping costs down, but I wonder. Adults should not be expected to share a room. If they choose to with a friend, that's another matter - but a stranger?

There was a post on Mumsnet recently about a team-building exercise involving camping and apparently you could end up in a tent with any colleague(s). I'm glad I'm old now.

When I did an ou course about 20 years back we all had our own rooms. It was a given.

Signalbox · 01/07/2023 10:35

Hagosaurus · 01/07/2023 09:15

i have also heard that the OU can be problematic. A friend is studying with them, and this involves residentials, sometimes with shared rooms. You are guaranteed same-gender room mates, but not same-sex. So this attitude is affecting academic rigour (Jo Phoenix as well as Pilgrim) and also basic admin. Well and truly captured, despite biology modules teaching clearly that all mammals are dimorphic 🤦‍♀️

This is so out of order because most people probably just book imagining that it means same sex and then they turn up and find themselves in a room with a man and can't say anything through fear of being called a bigot or worse. The whole thing relies on trickery and fear at every turn.

OP posts:
Hagosaurus · 01/07/2023 09:15

i have also heard that the OU can be problematic. A friend is studying with them, and this involves residentials, sometimes with shared rooms. You are guaranteed same-gender room mates, but not same-sex. So this attitude is affecting academic rigour (Jo Phoenix as well as Pilgrim) and also basic admin. Well and truly captured, despite biology modules teaching clearly that all mammals are dimorphic 🤦‍♀️

AuContraire · 01/07/2023 08:36

AuContraire · 01/07/2023 08:33

What is the GC aspect?

Cross posted, thanks.

AuContraire · 01/07/2023 08:33

What is the GC aspect?

Signalbox · 01/07/2023 08:33

My name is Pilgrim Tucker. I am taking legal action against the Open University for breach of contract, discrimination on the basis of my disabilites and gender critical beliefs, and bullying, harassment and victimisation, which has made it impossible for me to continue my PhD research at the OU, and I need your support.
My Story
In 2017 I was invited to study for a PhD at the Open University by OU academic staff Professor Steve Tombs and Dr Vickie Cooper following my campaigning work with residents of Grenfell Tower and the wider Lancaster West Estate before and after the 2017 fire.
I began my PhD at the OU in October 2018, researching the history of housing in North Kensington prior to the Grenfell Tower fire.
However Dr Chris Williams the OU historian that had committed to providing input on the research project was a leading transgender advocate within the university. On realising I was gender critical he blocked me on social media, and then withdrew from working on my project. Although I was promised his expertise would be replaced no history supervision input was provided.
From the time I started attempting to secure history supervision provision OU staff began to construct a false narrative about my application, claiming I had never been promised history supervision input on my PhD, and that I was being unreasonable in expecting the university to provide it.
Subsequently, other administrative and pastoral aspects of my PhD provision began to go very wrong, and I started to become increasingly stressed and anxious, and requested reasonable adjustments to accommodate my increasing mental health and menopause symptoms.
However rather than acknowledge and rectify any service provision failures, or put in place any adjustments to support my studies, the university attempted to conceal they had promised me history supervision and started to claim, falsely, that I had been rude to staff members, stating that the reason I had received a poor standard of provision at the university was due to illness and purported ‘problematic behavioural traits’ on my part.
OU failures included:

  • Informing me, wrongly, that I had no entitlement to sick pay or sick leave during periods of ill health, although ESRC funding rules obliged the OU to provide it, and instead advising me to take unpaid leave and claim state benefits while unwell.
  • Failure to provide counselling support during the period I was undertaking interviews with victims of the Grenfell Tower fire, despite this being specified as a necessary ethical requirement on my research ethics application and OU staff promising me counselling would be provided.
  • Being incorrectly advised by the head of faculty and other OU staff responsible for my PhD that the only way to change supervision arrangements was by making a formal complaint.
  • Failing to provide any reasonable adjustments for my disabilities.
  • Wrongly informing OU staff that I was dyslexic.
  • Failing to reimburse expenses claims amounting to hundreds of pounds for almost 2 years.
  • Removing funding for book purchases and falsely claiming I had not had book purchase funding provided from the time I started my PhD.
  • Failure to apply the university’s covid tracked extension system to my PhD to cover time lost due to covid lockdowns.
  • Failing to provide accurate or reliable information about thesis submission deadlines, study break allowance, and extensions, and providing constantly changing and inaccurate information regarding this.
  • Insisting I accept a trans rights activist academic in a pastoral support role.
  • Seeking to take punitive action against me, based on false and unsubstantiated allegations about my conduct, following the submission of my complaint about the standard of service provided to me by the university.
Although following my complaint the Open University accepted that I had been wrongly advised by senior OU staff members, and that I had experienced shortfalls in administrative provision, they minimised these, denying the majority of their failings. They have made no apology, and offered no remedy or compensation. The claims have been put to the Open University in a pre-action letter, which they have not responded to. The next step is for my barrister to draft particulars of the case in preparation for a legal hearing. I am currently seeking to raise £11,000, this is made up of £5230 in solicitors fees and £5670 – the cost of Barrister Alice De Coverley drafting the particulars of the case. Thank you for any contribution you can make.
OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread